From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
sstabellini@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, aliceryhl@google.com,
rppt@kernel.org, xur@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
arnd@arndb.de, mbenes@suse.cz, puranjay@kernel.org,
pcc@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
guohanjun@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org, liuwei09@cestc.cn,
dwmw@amazon.co.uk, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
liaochang1@huawei.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
ptosi@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, liuyuntao12@huawei.com, leobras@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 01/22] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:04:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206101744.4161990-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 06:17:23PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic entry code expects architecture code to provide
> regs_irqs_disabled(regs) function, but arm64 does not have this and
> provides inerrupts_enabled(regs), which has the opposite polarity.
>
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
> relace arm64's interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() and
> update its callers under arch/arm64.
>
> For the moment, a definition of interrupts_enabled() is provided for
> the GICv3 driver. Once arch/arm implement regs_irqs_disabled(), this
> can be removed.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> index fbb5c99eb2f9..5fca48009043 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void local_daif_inherit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> unsigned long flags = regs->pstate & DAIF_MASK;
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> trace_hardirqs_on();
>
> if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 47ff8654c5ec..bcfa96880377 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -214,9 +214,16 @@ static inline void forget_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> (regs)->pmr == GIC_PRIO_IRQON : \
> true)
>
> +/*
> + * Used by the GICv3 driver, can be removed once arch/arm implements
> + * regs_irqs_disabled() directly.
> + */
> #define interrupts_enabled(regs) \
> (!((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) && irqs_priority_unmasked(regs))
>
> +#define regs_irqs_disabled(regs) \
> + (((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || (!irqs_priority_unmasked(regs)))
Please make this:
| static __always_inline bool regs_irqs_disabled(const struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| return (regs->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || !irqs_priority_unmasked(regs);
| }
|
| #define interrupts_enabled(regs) (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
That way this matches the style of x86 and s390, and with
interrupts_enabled() defined in terms of regs_irqs_disabled(), the two
cannot accidentaly diverge.
> #define fast_interrupts_enabled(regs) \
> (!((regs)->pstate & PSR_F_BIT))
We should probably delete this at the same time; it's unused and we
don't want any new users to show up.
With those changes:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> index 2788e95d0ff0..2977b5fe068d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ enum ipi_vector {
>
> static inline int xen_irqs_disabled(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - return !interrupts_enabled(regs);
> + return regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
> }
>
> #define xchg_xen_ulong(ptr, val) xchg((ptr), (val))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index e6f66491fbe9..732f89daae23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
> return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
>
> if (regs)
> - return_to_irqs_enabled = interrupts_enabled(regs);
> + return_to_irqs_enabled = !regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
>
> /*
> * SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index 58f047de3e1c..460c09d03a73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void send_user_sigtrap(int si_code)
> if (WARN_ON(!user_mode(regs)))
> return;
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> local_irq_enable();
>
> arm64_force_sig_fault(SIGTRAP, si_code, instruction_pointer(regs),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index b260ddc4d3e9..c547e70428d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static __always_inline void __exit_to_kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> - if (interrupts_enabled(regs)) {
> + if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
> if (regs->exit_rcu) {
> trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void noinstr el1_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
> {
> write_sysreg(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ, daif);
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> __el1_pnmi(regs, handler);
> else
> __el1_irq(regs, handler);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> index 255d12f881c2..27a17da635d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ unsigned long __kprobes do_sdei_event(struct pt_regs *regs,
> * If we interrupted the kernel with interrupts masked, we always go
> * back to wherever we came from.
> */
> - if (mode == kernel_mode && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> + if (mode == kernel_mode && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> return SDEI_EV_HANDLED;
>
> /*
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241206101744.4161990-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-08 1:15 ` [PATCH -next v5 00/22] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:08 ` [PATCH -next v5 02/22] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:26 ` [PATCH -next v5 03/22] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 04/22] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:40 ` [PATCH -next v5 05/22] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-7-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:48 ` [PATCH -next v5 06/22] arm64: entry: Expand the need_irq_preemption() macro ahead Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-8-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:52 ` [PATCH -next v5 07/22] arm64: entry: preempt_schedule_irq() only if PREEMPTION enabled Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:54 ` [PATCH -next v5 08/22] arm64: entry: Use different helpers to check resched for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:04 ` [PATCH -next v5 09/22] entry: Split generic entry into irq and syscall Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-11-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:05 ` [PATCH -next v5 10/22] entry: Add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() for arm64 Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-12-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:24 ` [PATCH -next v5 11/22] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuwei09@cestc.cn \
--cc=liuyuntao12@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ptosi@google.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xur@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox