public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	sstabellini@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, aliceryhl@google.com,
	rppt@kernel.org, xur@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, mbenes@suse.cz, puranjay@kernel.org,
	pcc@google.com, ardb@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org, liuwei09@cestc.cn,
	dwmw@amazon.co.uk, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	liaochang1@huawei.com, kristina.martsenko@arm.com,
	ptosi@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, liuyuntao12@huawei.com, leobras@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 01/22] arm64: ptrace: Replace interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:04:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206101744.4161990-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 06:17:23PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic entry code expects architecture code to provide
> regs_irqs_disabled(regs) function, but arm64 does not have this and
> provides inerrupts_enabled(regs), which has the opposite polarity.
> 
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
> relace arm64's interrupts_enabled() with regs_irqs_disabled() and
> update its callers under arch/arm64.
> 
> For the moment, a definition of interrupts_enabled() is provided for
> the GICv3 driver. Once arch/arm implement regs_irqs_disabled(), this
> can be removed.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h  | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h     | 7 +++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c            | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c  | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c    | 4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c            | 2 +-
>  7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> index fbb5c99eb2f9..5fca48009043 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void local_daif_inherit(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags = regs->pstate & DAIF_MASK;
>  
> -	if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> +	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
>  		trace_hardirqs_on();
>  
>  	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 47ff8654c5ec..bcfa96880377 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -214,9 +214,16 @@ static inline void forget_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		(regs)->pmr == GIC_PRIO_IRQON :				\
>  		true)
>  
> +/*
> + * Used by the GICv3 driver, can be removed once arch/arm implements
> + * regs_irqs_disabled() directly.
> + */
>  #define interrupts_enabled(regs)			\
>  	(!((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) && irqs_priority_unmasked(regs))
>  
> +#define regs_irqs_disabled(regs)			\
> +	(((regs)->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || (!irqs_priority_unmasked(regs)))

Please make this:

| static __always_inline bool regs_irqs_disabled(const struct pt_regs *regs)
| {
| 	return (regs->pstate & PSR_I_BIT) || !irqs_priority_unmasked(regs);
| }
| 
| #define interrupts_enabled(regs)	(!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))

That way this matches the style of x86 and s390, and with
interrupts_enabled() defined in terms of regs_irqs_disabled(), the two
cannot accidentaly diverge.

>  #define fast_interrupts_enabled(regs) \
>  	(!((regs)->pstate & PSR_F_BIT))

We should probably delete this at the same time; it's unused and we
don't want any new users to show up.

With those changes:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> index 2788e95d0ff0..2977b5fe068d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/events.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ enum ipi_vector {
>  
>  static inline int xen_irqs_disabled(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	return !interrupts_enabled(regs);
> +	return regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
>  }
>  
>  #define xchg_xen_ulong(ptr, val) xchg((ptr), (val))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index e6f66491fbe9..732f89daae23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return_to_irqs_enabled = !irqs_disabled_flags(arch_local_save_flags());
>  
>  	if (regs)
> -		return_to_irqs_enabled = interrupts_enabled(regs);
> +		return_to_irqs_enabled = !regs_irqs_disabled(regs);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * SEA can interrupt SError, mask it and describe this as an NMI so
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index 58f047de3e1c..460c09d03a73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void send_user_sigtrap(int si_code)
>  	if (WARN_ON(!user_mode(regs)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (interrupts_enabled(regs))
> +	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
>  		local_irq_enable();
>  
>  	arm64_force_sig_fault(SIGTRAP, si_code, instruction_pointer(regs),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index b260ddc4d3e9..c547e70428d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static __always_inline void __exit_to_kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>  
> -	if (interrupts_enabled(regs)) {
> +	if (!regs_irqs_disabled(regs)) {
>  		if (regs->exit_rcu) {
>  			trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
>  			lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void noinstr el1_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  {
>  	write_sysreg(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ, daif);
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
>  		__el1_pnmi(regs, handler);
>  	else
>  		__el1_irq(regs, handler);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> index 255d12f881c2..27a17da635d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sdei.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ unsigned long __kprobes do_sdei_event(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	 * If we interrupted the kernel with interrupts masked, we always go
>  	 * back to wherever we came from.
>  	 */
> -	if (mode == kernel_mode && !interrupts_enabled(regs))
> +	if (mode == kernel_mode && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
>  		return SDEI_EV_HANDLED;
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241206101744.4161990-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-08  1:15 ` [PATCH -next v5 00/22] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-02-10 12:30   ` Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:43     ` Jinjie Ruan
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:04   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:08   ` [PATCH -next v5 02/22] arm64: entry: Refactor the entry and exit for exceptions from EL1 Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:26   ` [PATCH -next v5 03/22] arm64: entry: Move arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() into __exit_to_kernel_mode() Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:33   ` [PATCH -next v5 04/22] arm64: entry: Rework arm64_preempt_schedule_irq() Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:40   ` [PATCH -next v5 05/22] arm64: entry: Use preempt_count() and need_resched() helper Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-7-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:48   ` [PATCH -next v5 06/22] arm64: entry: Expand the need_irq_preemption() macro ahead Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-8-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:52   ` [PATCH -next v5 07/22] arm64: entry: preempt_schedule_irq() only if PREEMPTION enabled Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 11:54   ` [PATCH -next v5 08/22] arm64: entry: Use different helpers to check resched for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-10-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:04   ` [PATCH -next v5 09/22] entry: Split generic entry into irq and syscall Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-11-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:05   ` [PATCH -next v5 10/22] entry: Add arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched() for arm64 Mark Rutland
     [not found] ` <20241206101744.4161990-12-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
2025-02-10 12:24   ` [PATCH -next v5 11/22] arm64: entry: Switch to generic IRQ entry Mark Rutland
2025-02-11 11:32     ` Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6nc_itA5KT1Gk2i@J2N7QTR9R3 \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuwei09@cestc.cn \
    --cc=liuyuntao12@huawei.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ptosi@google.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=xur@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox