linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	 Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	 Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: Free vCPUs before freeing VM state
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 07:04:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z73cF_pWIFMreOf5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z71072F7FMz5aq/Q@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 58b82d6fd77c..045c61cc7e54 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -12890,11 +12890,11 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  		mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> >  	}
> >  	kvm_unload_vcpu_mmus(kvm);
> > +	kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
> >  	kvm_x86_call(vm_destroy)(kvm);
> >  	kvm_free_msr_filter(srcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.msr_filter, &kvm->srcu, 1));
> >  	kvm_pic_destroy(kvm);
> >  	kvm_ioapic_destroy(kvm);
> > -	kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
> >  	kvfree(rcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.apic_map, 1));
> >  	kfree(srcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu, 1));
> >  	kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
> After this change, now the sequence is that
> 
> 1. kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm()
> 2. kvm_arch_destroy_vm()
>    2.1 kvm_destroy_vcpus()
>    2.2 .vm_destroy hook
>    2.3 kvm_mmu_uninit_vm() --> mirror root ref is 1 upon here. Zap the mirror
>                                root and reclaim SETP page table pages.
>    2.4 .vm_free hook
> 
> Since TDX needs to reclaim the TDR page after reclaiming all other pages, we
> currently added a vm_free hook at 2.4, after 2.3.
> 
> Could we move kvm_mmu_uninit_vm() before the .vm_destroy hook and after
> kvm_destroy_vcpus()?
> 
> Or move the .vm_destroy hook after kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(), e.g. after
> kvm_page_track_cleanup()?

I would go for the first option.  I'll tack on a patch since I need to test all
of these flows anyways, and I would much prefer to change course sooner rather
than later if it doesn't work for whatever reason.

Is this comment accurate?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1e5f6f820c0b..f5685f153e08 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12874,13 +12874,19 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
                mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
        }
        kvm_destroy_vcpus(kvm);
+
+       /*
+        * Do final MMU teardown prior to calling into vendor code.  All pages
+        * that were donated to the TDX module, e.g. for S-EPT tables, need to
+        * be reclaimed before the VM metadata page can be freed.
+        */
+       kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
        kvm_x86_call(vm_destroy)(kvm);
        kvm_free_msr_filter(srcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.msr_filter, &kvm->srcu, 1));
        kvm_pic_destroy(kvm);
        kvm_ioapic_destroy(kvm);
        kvfree(rcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.apic_map, 1));
        kfree(srcu_dereference_check(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, &kvm->srcu, 1));
-       kvm_mmu_uninit_vm(kvm);
        kvm_page_track_cleanup(kvm);
        kvm_xen_destroy_vm(kvm);
        kvm_hv_destroy_vm(kvm);


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 23:55 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: nVMX IRQ fix and VM teardown cleanups Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: Free vCPUs before freeing VM state Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25  7:44   ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 15:04     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-26  7:34       ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 23:47   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-26  0:27     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26  9:18       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: nVMX: Process events on nested VM-Exit if injectable IRQ or NMI is pending Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: Assert that a destroyed/freed vCPU is no longer visible Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25  7:07   ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 14:35     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86: Don't load/put vCPU when unloading its MMU during teardown Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25  7:13   ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 14:44     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86: Unload MMUs during vCPU destruction, not before Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: x86: Fold guts of kvm_arch_sync_events() into kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm() Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: Drop kvm_arch_sync_events() now that all implementations are nops Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 12:05   ` bibo mao
2025-02-25 16:15   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-02-26 18:38 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: nVMX IRQ fix and VM teardown cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2025-03-27  3:24 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z73cF_pWIFMreOf5@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).