From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A619C021B3 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:33:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=pTALlKbSKJ0pfCW0bKggFYFpg7EFYynYFxwssKh+C9Q=; b=d5eNJEctJXV4EHGQ9uPHerhs58 EXMg9+NxqfWD0jWbreBpxhahXNU0U5fhY0y84GjTdNFw0mDJZ40DVJWU+Y4vOrNDDv0P9FkUUdDaf 70OSEFfPOzGB1PuEtHVBA07DRxM7sbM9iS7J87RNjeGpgA5kO/X6pNiu8V9Jy6ZBZrNzgTRJ4MOvW 4WTYxj/rkOgOkSujjv/ba58/xmD2RXj9bEjMkEvcvEdet+UA3fjBtEqNLU4Q7YGpukmIdE9/qV8DY K80soO08EDfe6HM2moYOcFZpbKI6NexizUOjTUkMZQRBnNWWz/vXnDv20PTPp7PdI9ryDCKkFkxWo +AO8ayWg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tmUpo-0000000Cw2j-1Za6; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:33:08 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tmUT3-0000000CpZz-2RMX; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:09:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pTALlKbSKJ0pfCW0bKggFYFpg7EFYynYFxwssKh+C9Q=; b=k2mfxxUsJMg20o414L508A20Sz IsMmCXwHj9Pve7EakuteAeW2Mijmx7tgNQvJFjEMhorcIp13CSNZUzKt7Sw/+drbSmQypPhFIjkzH zSL/HW3fMprv+bGoQucs7FWZUZLr/RMkNONqdbRoDhV5EI89H9aB0fCgWH5dUQcANxgEmiOVsLKAz Tysehk9IQp3OMgJLLqPeUuhrLaLXDkHr36NrY34n0hTZqRyIN8OlWEoVVqktJ84ZrUAnZHGM2puSo h+If2Gf1Ilku7oFCtXW2jEi1cWQQod7w61T/fqr2D7bPOCjw2noB8r+UstUy4m8wsDIb5gDNbE7V+ gJemzfpw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:53832) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tmUSs-0005bT-1N; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:09:26 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tmUSo-0004sM-28; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:09:22 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:09:22 +0000 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Joe Perches Cc: Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Jakub Kicinski , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Drew Fustini , Eric Dumazet , Fu Wei , Guo Ren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: stmmac: thead: clean up clock rate setting Message-ID: References: <7bf9577f4b6dcb818785be73c175bcd19b3b4f0c.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7bf9577f4b6dcb818785be73c175bcd19b3b4f0c.camel@perches.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250224_010937_631348_01B0EA87 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 06:33:44AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2025-02-23 at 11:40 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > Adding Joe Perches. > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 02:15:17PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > [] > > I've been investigating why the NIPA bot complains about maintainers > > not being Cc'd, such as for patch 1 of this series: > > > > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/936447/13985595/cc_maintainers/stdout > > Additional maintainers added or missing? Let me be clear - NIPA is not something under my control. It is a bot run by Jakub on netdev patches that are received by patchwork - so patches that have been emailed out, and thus contain at least the To:, Cc: and Subject: header lines, possibly all header lines that have been added such as Received: etc. I don't know what it actually does. Now let me restate the problem, because the answer to your question is in the problem description. Here's the short version: K: entries match email headers. Here's the long version: If one runs get_maintainers.pl on a patch produced from git, it comes out with a list of maintainers. In the case of dwmac-thead.c, this includes an email address that contains "riscv". If one adds this list of maintainers to email headers in the patch prior to sending it out and then re-runs get_maintainers.pl on it, or if one receives the patch after it having been emailed out, and then runs get_maintainers.pl to validate that all appropriate maintainers were sent a copy of the patch, then get_maintainers.pl comes out with *extra* *additional* maintainers because the "K: riscv" line matches *email* *headers*. In this exact case of dwmac-thead.c, the first run prior to sending out reports an email address containing "riscv". On these subsequent runs with the maintainers added to email headers, the presence of "K: riscv" in MAINTAINERS causes get_maintainers.pl to report the three maintains for the "RISCV ARCHITECTURE" entry. This is an issue for you as get_maintainers.pl maintainer and Jakub as NIPA bot author to hash out - either get_maintainers.pl is acting incorrectly and needs to be fixed, or NIPA is abusing get_maintainers.pl in a way that it's not designed to be used. I'm merely an observer of this behaviour and am merely reporting the problem - that NIPA's cc_maintainers claim that maintainers were not copied in my patch submission is incorrect and I've done the research to identify _why_ it's incorrect. It's now up to you two to decide where the problem lies and what the solution should be. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!