From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Drop mte_allowed check during memslot creation
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:05:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7xSfVME4z2ComUm@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224093938.3934386-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:09:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> Before commit d89585fbb308 ("KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in
> memslots when MTE is enabled"), kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region() only
> rejected a memory slot if VM_SHARED was set. This commit unified the
> checking with user_mem_abort(), with slots being rejected if either
> VM_MTE_ALLOWED is not set or VM_SHARED set. A subsequent commit
> c911f0d46879 ("KVM: arm64: permit all VM_MTE_ALLOWED mappings with MTE
> enabled") dropped the VM_SHARED check, so we ended up with memory slots
> being rejected if VM_MTE_ALLOWED is not set. This wasn't the case before
> the commit d89585fbb308. The rejection of the memory slot with VM_SHARED
> set was done to avoid a race condition with the test/set of the
> PG_mte_tagged flag. Before Commit d77e59a8fccd ("arm64: mte: Lock a page
> for MTE tag initialization") the kernel avoided allowing MTE with shared
> pages, thereby preventing two tasks sharing a page from setting up the
> PG_mte_tagged flag racily.
>
> Commit d77e59a8fccd ("arm64: mte: Lock a page for MTE tag
> initialization") further updated the locking so that the kernel
> allows VM_SHARED mapping with MTE. With this commit, we can enable
> memslot creation with VM_SHARED VMA mapping.
>
> This patch results in a minor tweak to the ABI. We now allow creating
> memslots that don't have the VM_MTE_ALLOWED flag set.
As I commented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z4e04P1bQlFBDHo7@arm.com
I'm fine with the change, we basically go back to the original ABI prior
to relaxing this for VM_SHARED.
> If the guest uses
> such a memslot with Allocation Tags, the kernel will generate -EFAULT.
> ie, instead of failing early, we now fail later during KVM_RUN.
Nit: more like the kernel "will return -EFAULT" to the VMM rather than
"generate".
> This change is needed because, without it, users are not able to use MTE
> with VFIO passthrough (currently the mapping is either Device or
> NonCacheable for which tag access check is not applied.), as shown
> below (kvmtool VMM).
Another nit: "users are not able to user VFIO passthrough when MTE is
enabled". At a first read, the above sounded to me like one wants to
enable MTE for VFIO passthrough mappings.
> [ 617.921030] vfio-pci 0000:01:00.0: resetting
> [ 618.024719] vfio-pci 0000:01:00.0: reset done
> Error: 0000:01:00.0: failed to register region with KVM
> Warning: [0abc:aced] Error activating emulation for BAR 0
> Error: 0000:01:00.0: failed to configure regions
> Warning: Failed init: vfio__init
>
> Fatal: Initialisation failed
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ef53af6df6de..1f1b5aa43d2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2178,11 +2178,6 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> if (!vma)
> break;
>
> - if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) {
> /* IO region dirty page logging not allowed */
> if (new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 9:39 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Drop mte_allowed check during memslot creation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-02-24 10:32 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-02-24 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-02-24 12:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-24 14:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-24 15:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-24 16:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-02-24 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-26 8:02 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-26 9:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-02-26 15:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-26 16:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-02-26 18:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-24 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7xSfVME4z2ComUm@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).