From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8CDBC282D0 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:58:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=aAAx0WCfVD9Yht0Hjqf+5lQdm3MbQGouHvs42YNXPAI=; b=vWPgw2cN1A+2ICg9wNQ9hrDai6 mMcV3V2pmC4pJjpTTYVersN/YUaejsbmfxhn1YKFaLPX3fTP/kxZeBi6XmFE18wRhfXEXYlBz1WhN 8JpWQ70vVfqKH8KHLvMw0zCkIwIpDOCwD6aeW7czxW0N24gEE8pfwDwFwh7ZvGlPOiZQj5rSndiQu OgRP3fsSiKFfHyCJL7ly/2sBJ4vUDyW70/pCiBiz5JLB2mp7lT3ONfcAJHIdcZCToYoda/OvuQoz/ IBX2xWct68SKYsLeey9a+5XkzNTB0NuH+BXSOcjVYwQam58q6MweahT1l0mDLvFqW6NkGUhlXqcKb HcyFEc1g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpP2Y-0000000420m-3E9O; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:58:18 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpOz0-000000040rU-1fdz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:54:39 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBE9FEC; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 676D93F5A1; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 01:54:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:54:32 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Will Deacon Cc: Marc Zyngier , Sebastian Ene , Sudeep Holla , catalin.marinas@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, snehalreddy@google.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, vdonnefort@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Move the ffa_to_linux definition to the ffa header Message-ID: References: <20250227181750.3606372-1-sebastianene@google.com> <20250227181750.3606372-3-sebastianene@google.com> <20250227202557.d3fd6ylzbaho4pvx@bogus> <86wmdapei8.wl-maz@kernel.org> <20250303234426.GB30749@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250303234426.GB30749@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250304_015438_478582_7E41EE83 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 11:44:28PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:09:19AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 23:12:37 +0000, > > Sebastian Ene wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:25:57PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:17:47PM +0000, Sebastian Ene wrote: > > > > > Keep the ffa_to_linux error map in the header and move it away > > > > > from the arm ffa driver to make it accessible for other components. > > > > > > > > Do you plan to push/target these changes for v6.15 ? If not, I can take > > > > this patch with other FF-A changes in my tree for v6.15. Otherwise, it > > > > is must go along with other changes. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, feel free to pick them with your changes and we can push them > > > later. > > > > So this series is not a 6.15 candidate? > > I think this is 6.15 stuff once it's been reviewed. Sudeep's message is > a little confusing as it refers to 6.15 twice (I guess he meant 6.14 the > first time?). > No I meant v6.15 both times 😉. Since not much time before v6.15, I was thinking if this is not v6.15 material, I can just take the driver change for v6.15 itself via my tree. Now that, you have clarified, I will leave it to you. I think it doesn't conflict with any of driver changes in -next. In short, just to avoid any further confusion, please take it via arm64/kvm tree. -- Regards, Sudeep