linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug report] Memory leak in scmi_device_create
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 17:10:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8iFeEWq16pNQdMa@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z8g8vhS9rqQ_ez48@google.com>

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:59:58AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> Dear SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER/MANAGEMENT INTERFACE (SCPI/SCMI) Message
> Protocol drivers maintainers,
> 
> I flashed a v6.13-rc3 kernel onto a Rock5B board and noticed the
> following output in my terminal:
> 
> [  687.694465] kmemleak: 4 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
> 
> It seems that there is a memory leak for devices created with
> scmi_device_create.
> 
`
Hi Alice,

thanks for this report.

> This was with a kernel running v6.13-rc3, but as far as I can tell, no
> relevant changes have landed since v6.13-rc3. My tree *does* include
> commit 295416091e44 ("firmware: arm_scmi: Fix slab-use-after-free in
> scmi_bus_notifier()"). I've only seen this kmemleak report once, so it's
> not happening consistently.
> 
> See below for the full kmemleak report.
> 
> Alice
> 
> $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> unreferenced object 0xffffff8106c86000 (size 2048):
>   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294893094
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     02 00 00 00 10 00 00 00 c0 01 bc 03 81 ff ff ff  ................
>     60 67 ba 03 81 ff ff ff 18 60 c8 06 81 ff ff ff  `g.......`......
>   backtrace (crc feae9680):
>     [<00000000197aa008>] kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0xa0
>     [<0000000056fe02c9>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1e0/0x450
>     [<00000000a8b3dfe1>] __scmi_device_create+0xb4/0x2b4
>     [<000000008714917b>] scmi_device_create+0x40/0x194
>     [<000000001818f3cf>] scmi_chan_setup+0x144/0x3b8
>     [<00000000970bad38>] scmi_probe+0x584/0xa78
>     [<000000002600d2fd>] platform_probe+0xbc/0xf0
>     [<00000000f6f556b4>] really_probe+0x1b8/0x520
>     [<00000000eed93d59>] __driver_probe_device+0xe0/0x1d8
>     [<00000000d613b754>] driver_probe_device+0x6c/0x208
>     [<00000000187a9170>] __driver_attach+0x168/0x328
>     [<00000000e3ff1834>] bus_for_each_dev+0x14c/0x178
>     [<00000000984a3176>] driver_attach+0x34/0x44
>     [<00000000fc35bf2a>] bus_add_driver+0x1bc/0x358
>     [<00000000747fce19>] driver_register+0xc0/0x1a0
>     [<0000000081cb8754>] __platform_driver_register+0x40/0x50
> unreferenced object 0xffffff8103bc01c0 (size 32):

I could not reproduce on my setup, even though I run a system with
all the existent SCMI protocols (and related drivers) enabled (and
so a lot of device creations) and a downstream test driver that causes
even more SCMI devices to be created/destroyed at load/unload.

Coming down the path from scmi_chan_setup(), it seems something around
transport devices creation, but it is not obvious to me where the leak
could hide....

...any particular setup on your side ? ...using LKMs, loading/unloading,
any usage pattern that could help me reproduce ?

Thanks,
Cristian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05 11:59 [Bug report] Memory leak in scmi_device_create Alice Ryhl
2025-03-05 17:10 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2025-03-06 11:09   ` Alice Ryhl
2025-03-06 12:50     ` Cristian Marussi
2025-03-06 13:25       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-03-06 14:36     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-06 15:47       ` Cristian Marussi
2025-03-06 16:18         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-06 18:43           ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8iFeEWq16pNQdMa@pluto \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).