From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28922C19F32 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 20:30:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=L/QTa2tRzjTsRK+rDfj4YO0c0vZaK0hr1T6XotcHvoc=; b=Fz0+gpHs7GdY86t7IYyRg4+8Br 9O5SwGu6wEF0RLCU0INxBRbyncslVqzQ83Wma/q+UgIBciAl7r9o9si2MoWz2PidjZDCHJgCG8MeB MMmtwQD/tsewmcZPvn0pENCNI1tnetqYGDU5pQ/jC+rw9sBkO+V4AVeMXwfWFGE9tKas7Psi6P2Pf 02a9/J5xwe3Ox+s6RSx+sMz3eNs3e4VAIwZUxbYCh3aGnSGHpMIiLFIW41/obXQdSGeMX26TLUfCx xf3HqalWZdhH3eNj1mvN5VpxBBNb+ASUqis+okeWMVDfWPCMmUYFbfY5eQIIhODv6px5pj40O3uqW hz7KmKVg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpvNi-00000009Dio-3OOS; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 20:30:18 +0000 Received: from mail-mw2nam10on20628.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f403:2412::628] helo=NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tpuhX-0000000977W-1gxq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2025 19:46:44 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=AOQYGCUwvGo4cC7Qlk3Ew4I8mS8WVUTNn1xP1Wa1xIwA8IYFc4vO6YDHKtvuX6hiM+Bq5JxhZDjUpjEcLHeID6s/47PJOX4XtqQkNQN320+3abs0rXuMPhxDcBjrDytPLXL6uZScEE93irdZDbqDv2lvp9RoNfr7HwEWaxtqaa6wYYTXlyJxk6IWqIc7EqZ8CoFqaz/Tq7+lc6lIoowvpWQAts2jTINsEsBFm8R7+SDk+CIG0d0Az1ZAETBXAX17tq+bsB8YRIWo/YNJGFkPa7xvtu2bwnFtD5ykC/0r9boc56J0rxLoCMBlpMW8meSapnwJeoLG8GhHIiRw7LJ/Zg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=L/QTa2tRzjTsRK+rDfj4YO0c0vZaK0hr1T6XotcHvoc=; b=j8dOtOeQDBkLX0dqgh+YjnbZuzpF4fzmFAQX0fuX0bGG+0nb0uNjsAKV9OU09xzubBoGiNFlWRg8D+55msXtbl3JNBba9U3cTA6OT58uP8Qyxgw/Y+HK3SNvQXECtesBdG0sjIXVq58qyawTgSjy/8R8H3Uo5UXcc8u7bk+O+kcNy7ZMTbXtJb9rC6lR9SyEgpFTcu98+nR9K6lhf39t+WX2BbixkCmz0tvDLWkklnwuD+iEst8fAB49vvEUGtyHOptrJL2CvLDVnLDDCnFwQQwCVfyXuzSjNfMLF6A2fJLJFZ6kwvDUL1p/8OdfnsdAcqAY4HgygkBrpEwKSYqJHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.118.233) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=L/QTa2tRzjTsRK+rDfj4YO0c0vZaK0hr1T6XotcHvoc=; b=qq3kj7PtTeYH/elOVoV6ZImX1IltHPhnjvLNrLuAUSNtSLk5PE4iSqdkv6lltDx59XR70nKXiU1QyWiGrsRcH8httuVU1NEWVfYyIyn7HprzewpLr4EyzSDmtFz8Pkh2z18D97z+5porCdRg6AlEcUJ2AcDO6bT9tWZqf2VFSZAzGiBeDdcHorF4RKiyadJ77vGHs1P4S2Znob851ADt81DsnWEjewjjb0+ZgAWYKLueyOt5bh7buDpw0ftvVRXwAR4tXE32bKDJdn0DIglD8BX4kbimsNefilg2V4C0Z1tR66usPgp3w/zHzDEeyfq2Iqg5FEBUuPrxgRH+Y/RO+A== Received: from CH5PR04CA0020.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:1f4::21) by CH1PPFC8B3B7859.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:61f:fc00::622) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8489.25; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 19:46:37 +0000 Received: from DS3PEPF000099E0.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:1f4:cafe::e3) by CH5PR04CA0020.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:610:1f4::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8511.16 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 19:46:37 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.118.233) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.118.233 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.118.233; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.118.233) by DS3PEPF000099E0.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.17.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.8511.15 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 19:46:36 +0000 Received: from drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) by mail.nvidia.com (10.127.129.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.4; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:46:26 -0800 Received: from drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) by drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.14; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:46:25 -0800 Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (10.127.8.12) by mail.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.14 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:46:25 -0800 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:46:18 -0800 From: Nicolin Chen To: Jason Gunthorpe CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate vmid per vsmmu instead of s2_parent Message-ID: References: <20250305165452.GY133783@nvidia.com> <20250305183151.GE133783@nvidia.com> <20250305192950.GA354511@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250305192950.GA354511@nvidia.com> X-NV-OnPremToCloud: AnonymousSubmission X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DS3PEPF000099E0:EE_|CH1PPFC8B3B7859:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b7f96686-3290-4cdd-c595-08dd5c1e70f8 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|1800799024|36860700013|376014|82310400026; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: =?us-ascii?Q?mcNIUgMRv4vDLfJZqVzEwP1ViNC1TytvkcqcN65OpNLInSDdzXrbQPdzw1Rw?= =?us-ascii?Q?K+yQ7uQM33mlcV5gaViHh4tcW01tGmwu5X95CpaYnxnWtMeNk9JZ862Q4deM?= =?us-ascii?Q?P2XxKN1tjakGC9mlc0g6lvb+wN04GiZe1mkw10guUA+rggYWsiy8cdm9wUrj?= =?us-ascii?Q?KquoPS8WZPAX7qm9DjYfiAugLT/DGA7DVElJ1lQZq/AWyh3bSBN/EaCZftvw?= =?us-ascii?Q?hmmopbKIJblPzgqzhWBhekahJKSoTbl8JNwLOnDZXMd6xYrt2PbIJ9+mwxqZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?rREUvUnu03EF5pZND7kWJuSdvfMB5EJN7RGzH/3eiOB2qTMmVc+U0ClqRI2q?= =?us-ascii?Q?0tfyNaFiFn4HNgXpDdgBBSjq4QJ1x0b8UH+tHiGUDjJl/g6h1+BJod3KG0vO?= =?us-ascii?Q?booyhdiTbB/dQa4HGx7ZCekCLaNTRV1NuJUOyuJJYghzv2U8IArBLJw8Wc7F?= =?us-ascii?Q?zcdwOuOM0nHjV2vbCCJI3fKNmDlTfefH/hbJoEI/dRD/1kIR5LWX6sf02lAx?= =?us-ascii?Q?mpCbmMIHjDRH+WcZLW8gsDEs4HRu3MotHKY26Oroz3i+dGikWsNGWGgYcyV7?= =?us-ascii?Q?oXXozNAIXrWBHOAQp+uH3d/LG1goG0aj6ajatP1Au6Nxfroz16zv8rJqTNdX?= =?us-ascii?Q?vWmeU9LcnvnKuPZGiApbrU/n8SfFvxnzelBW2KOT1zGYzidH7dAchsvIt5gN?= =?us-ascii?Q?fyo9zcRXH/kiQqXOOlAzp2Huc9WUut5x2KXgPawrc2N6MsbcF3PawTQhuzYS?= =?us-ascii?Q?mj21pnjaE0fDn/CP+wmMIu36bihnj2EeNhs75HKmoh3TkUOt5fJlZaWTaBZS?= =?us-ascii?Q?H3UANDOfXB5zQRuA2GBWYlWvbwpKodkxXGmf4oP3jT5qfjqxC2DpQZ26xJpc?= =?us-ascii?Q?rj5C/Hs6PkFgs6H7HtinlY9rGABwNm07+1AichCnqZf3so6qRlyNTM99Icga?= =?us-ascii?Q?cGy5uvIoZ7qSLZ6xZh/4GRWD+Hc3J0Nbxd2rd+BIUdTuh46bcnGQSyMzeqrc?= =?us-ascii?Q?/86c/xHEwsmwqWJSZQ43nyAknTWmI+O5SMSII1IOxpO5rqX8TKcvHYFFNhAT?= =?us-ascii?Q?OX7gmLzgB6FMcXj/8MzhbRjcjaIkiAaoSU34XqTF5t9mtktGpglpuEs3VKhh?= =?us-ascii?Q?sJ/fiiJZkMJZQtq1v6263tUt9On2CFjN82iHlHWNKW2sbqcFRb3BXP4KVoI3?= =?us-ascii?Q?VKnnGgYSaYMR+NlUZCBVd8zfpqeWBTUZTKKybvuytie/unRbE8LgyuhoIjP5?= =?us-ascii?Q?6EV5K7to9teZ7YFPEoIIKnLlSE4X2WJFFFyEMhMvRlckrXLVry1vZb/MLOZk?= =?us-ascii?Q?8VoIMrKHoeq+HiW+h3ozmi1JBvAw6Mcuu0s1aIAbqoTYVDWSebRboQtWGuvk?= =?us-ascii?Q?H7qlVBmSojMIVznkb0orgvw9jSkf8ksJsL9AJuttxRAokKgxecKWI9hM5/vC?= =?us-ascii?Q?wDzRH0YUwjgjO6xRqz2ok3weYptEbqr/qgvwgbe4w2GC7vyjsjAZhY0IzYvx?= =?us-ascii?Q?N9Bt3/yIZgzRpiM=3D?= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.118.233;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc7edge2.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(1800799024)(36860700013)(376014)(82310400026);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2025 19:46:36.9041 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b7f96686-3290-4cdd-c595-08dd5c1e70f8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.118.233];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS3PEPF000099E0.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH1PPFC8B3B7859 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250305_114643_443935_C6DA2095 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:29:50PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:51:38AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > > I mean a normal S2 domain attaching to multiple devices on multiple > > > instances. > > > > Oh, I haven't thought about a !nest_parent S2 case. > > > > A nest_parent case will not allow devices to attach the S2 but > > always to a proxy nested S1 as we discussed previously. So, I > > think the implementation could be very different? > > It could, and that is what you show here > > But also, it could be the same implementation. OK. Obviously I underestimated this part of work. Implementation aside, this at lease needs some assessment of any invalidation impact. I should do some extra tracing. Thanks Nicolin