From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEC0C28B28 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:35:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8gb2WnBHO3Ot9BixCv4lVirnBDQfeIR0mQCU9X3VHw4=; b=TCBOLepMW97KlBGKheEYTZfPTx Sy8s42/M5kXhU5OVYuyI1RwJFWH3lFjTIZ3PH+QZjxsWxbcQzFW9C10qnGUv42p57Jw4q63aojfR6 bbN2EFHY9DgP7gJZLID5D5IsHjXGupai2TzifxsKCPcjU0UGV1jt5OvG6004i28R8FdmuZbkfvzOm X+bPPxJsQLWay5qYnTh+hL00wn56LdvvNBqqtrN/cwOJnXq/jcsmMLWrV2ObME6Dz/ZSJBhLioCBI DEavd2WBeu5MW+KDRvFuUgDAYNjPwHl19VJi62nxUo+L9bvv7YfPQyOVMR5FuHjspGuaEBTqS1d5J wMHXAIaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tsP3b-000000092wI-3lFb; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:35:48 +0000 Received: from mail.8bytes.org ([2a01:238:42d9:3f00:e505:6202:4f0c:f051]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tsNtb-00000008q8y-3RYS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:21:25 +0000 Received: from 8bytes.org (p4ffe03ae.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.254.3.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39B93457EA; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:21:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1741792879; bh=4sQmwkxed47J1yAVFY1M8IrVAON5A+0JqlWOAYiAt0g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xgUseHpfm/duHTEwQRTgX7/pauJE0Oh8fZ2kNPDxNy4/6mY9AGXU20bYatRDGiRFC 2XLH9+jFCs8YySrzCSPu9SQgWGSribYev3e1rQ+pwqqyN1mqPJVu/ga9Vn74BA+J3H UiyzKeGKERMvEZHmat4/khRc4SaEi1wdKZDg2XifJe4ljlAwPT69QcrPko87TXxxkQ IHWTxAmwmKNFxYLYPVgWu/YHImYGBRl75RPl+uE9B9qlgJ1rBoX1F46qGH1sRbTTFZ YBvFflm9hrsYcn3+iyZG/zm5sNDFxrm3QO+dMzCUZ9rBy0T7d0kQHMtsNOzdZtNKZk E8iOdVUM4QuoQ== Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:21:18 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Robin Murphy Cc: Baolu Lu , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Russell King , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich , Stuart Yoder , Laurentiu Tudor , Nipun Gupta , Nikhil Agarwal , Will Deacon , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Charan Teja Kalla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250312_082124_076878_013F84CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Robin, On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 10:10:04AM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Argh! When I moved the dma_configure call into iommu_init_device() for > v2 I moved the warning with it, but of course that needs to stay where > it was, *after* the point that ops->probe_device has had a chance to > filter out irrelevant devices. Does this make it behave? Okay, thanks for the patch. I am currently building a kernel to test it and will report back. Regards, Joerg