public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: psci: Fix refcount leak in psci_dt_init
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:39:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9qs6r_eaQ0qLx9B@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9qmglbXw0xILaet@J2N7QTR9R3>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:12:02AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:46:49AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:28:38PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> 
> > Any reason why we can't move to the new scoped usage like below?
> 
> > diff --git i/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c w/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > index a1ebbe9b73b1..a4269078b2a2 100644
> > --- i/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > +++ w/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > @@ -797,12 +797,11 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > 
> >  int __init psci_dt_init(void)
> >  {
> > -       struct device_node *np;
> >         const struct of_device_id *matched_np;
> >         psci_initcall_t init_fn;
> >         int ret;
> > -
> > -       np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, psci_of_match, &matched_np);
> > +       struct device_node *np __free(device_node) =
> > +               of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, psci_of_match, &matched_np);
> > 
> >         if (!np || !of_device_is_available(np))
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -810,7 +809,6 @@ int __init psci_dt_init(void)
> >         init_fn = (psci_initcall_t)matched_np->data;
> >         ret = init_fn(np);
> > 
> > -       of_node_put(np);
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> 
> IIUC the bug has existed since before the scoped helpers were
> introduced, so for the sake of keeping the backport simple I reckon we
> should take Miaoqian Lin's patch as-is, and we can consider moving to
> the scoped helpers as a later cleanup.
> 

Agreed.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 15:17 [PATCH] firmware: psci: Fix refcount leak in psci_dt_init Miaoqian Lin
2025-03-19 10:28 ` Gavin Shan
2025-03-19 10:46   ` Sudeep Holla
2025-03-19 11:12     ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-19 11:39       ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-03-19 11:23 ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-19 23:30 ` Gavin Shan
2025-04-29 20:27 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9qs6r_eaQ0qLx9B@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox