linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove special treatment for the link order of head.o
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:12:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBzAp457rrO52FPy@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHwtb9aY+vd4e69Wg47GpL0sT=dDaCUA1sF7=edzc+Qeg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 2023-03-22 15:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 23:26, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2022-10-13 08:35, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > In the previous discussion (see the Link tag), Ard pointed out that
> > > arm/arm64/kernel/head.o does not need any special treatment - the only
> > > piece that must appear right at the start of the binary image is the
> > > image header which is emitted into .head.text.
> > >
> > > The linker script does the right thing to do. The build system does
> > > not need to manipulate the link order of head.o.
> > >
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMj1kXH77Ja8bSsq2Qj8Ck9iSZKw=1F8Uy-uAWGVDm4-CG=EuA@mail.gmail.com/
> > > Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  scripts/head-object-list.txt | 1 -
> > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/head-object-list.txt b/scripts/head-object-list.txt
> > > index b16326a92c45..f226e45e3b7b 100644
> > > --- a/scripts/head-object-list.txt
> > > +++ b/scripts/head-object-list.txt
> > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ arch/alpha/kernel/head.o
> > >  arch/arc/kernel/head.o
> > >  arch/arm/kernel/head-nommu.o
> > >  arch/arm/kernel/head.o
> > > -arch/arm64/kernel/head.o
> > >  arch/csky/kernel/head.o
> > >  arch/hexagon/kernel/head.o
> > >  arch/ia64/kernel/head.o
> >
> > This patch causes a significant increase of the arch/arm64/boot/Image
> > size. For instance the generic arm64 Debian kernel went from 31 to 39 MB
> > after this patch has been applied to the 6.1 stable tree.
> >
> > In turn this causes issues with some bootloaders, for instance U-Boot on
> > a Raspberry Pi limits the kernel size to 36 MB.
> >
> 
> I cannot reproduce this with mainline
> 
> With the patch
> 
> $ size vmlinux
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 24567309 14752630 621680 39941619 26175f3 vmlinux
> 
> With the patch reverted
> 
> $ size vmlinux
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 24567309 14752694 621680 39941683 2617633 vmlinux

I have tried with the current mainline, this is what I get, using GCC 12.2.0
and binutils 2.40:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
32531655        8192996  621968 41346619        276e63b vmlinux.orig
25170610        8192996  621968 33985574        2069426 vmlinux.revert

> It would help to compare the resulting vmlinux ELF images from both
> builds to see where the extra space is being allocated

At a first glance, it seems the extra space is allocated in the BTF
section. I have uploaded the resulting files as well as the config file
I used there:
https://temp.aurel32.net/linux-arm64-size-head.o.tar.gz

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-23 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12 23:35 [PATCH] arm64: remove special treatment for the link order of head.o Masahiro Yamada
2022-10-13 17:07 ` Nicolas Schier
2022-11-07 19:08 ` Will Deacon
2023-03-21 22:26 ` Aurelien Jarno
2023-03-22 14:51   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-23 21:12     ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2023-03-24 11:33       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-03-24 23:33         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-03-28  4:05           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-03-25  6:05         ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-03-25 11:42           ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-03-28 10:33             ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-03-28 19:52               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-29  7:29                 ` Aurelien Jarno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBzAp457rrO52FPy@aurel32.net \
    --to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).