From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8405C77B6E for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:49:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jtjhyyfZ8PZ+on8dlCjNj+/qKgqOBhwBVJab9UiBIuw=; b=quQ+y7wOsjpRDB 13d5XK7n2PrakEhIVGLu5xUi4T8EWk6+5gis+eEukSmXrs35Y26aZHPppX3rrecLRZ6Ph431ZhcHr fz1Rqzgz8bisaNhCrEpYHcBX/c8M/Z0RnY2p5O5SmIVskPvh2zDXjQFG85Zv3hsVyI03EIsSNoxg5 5yiAPsbrEP/M0z2UmZb1dMZKKP64/WEt5V7Oig4r6MKNJ3QowuasjbxHklZ2k2ZHanvzxbuNxAoKy HwG1TustiSBPe0uhdxEaA27GP6DMwh8pyw2H3BSL7KOOvMNij9uRYc65nim1vbHtDhoQRryMehOCj 1PKlz91lOzBnzzyqVoXw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmWAA-002JQk-1i; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:49:10 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmWA6-002JQC-36 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:49:08 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EC41684; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.21.3]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 523C53F587; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:48:59 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Eric Auger Cc: Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Oliver Upton , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Andrew Jones , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: pmu-chain-promotion kvm-unit-test failures in mainline Message-ID: References: <861qkpmtw3.wl-maz@kernel.org> <84aaa360-3f96-d648-0fe3-cb6667542bc7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84aaa360-3f96-d648-0fe3-cb6667542bc7@redhat.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230412_014907_050306_E9E2E5B8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:00:40AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > Hi, > On 4/12/23 09:39, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:15:02 +0100, > > Mark Brown wrote: > >> > >> [1 ] > >> Arm's internal test infrastructure has started seeing failures for the > >> pmu-chain-promption test in kvm-unit-tests on TX2 when running mainline > >> and kvm-unit-tests commit 2480430a36102f8ea276b3bfb1d64d5dacc23b8f > >> ("configure: Show the option in case it is not known"). The log I'm > >> seeing from the test runner is: > >> > >> TESTNAME=pmu-chain-promotion TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./arm/run arm/pmu.flat -smp 1 -append 'pmu-chain-promotion' > >> FAIL pmu-chain-promotion (7 tests, 2 unexpected failures) > >> > >> Unfortunately I don't have direct access to a TX2 so can't readily > >> alter the test run other than replacing the kernel. I believe the > >> specific failures were: > >> > >> FAIL: pmu: pmu-chain-promotion: 32-bit overflows: CHAIN counter enabled: CHAIN counter was incremented and overflow > >> FAIL: pmu: pmu-chain-promotion: 32-bit overflows: CHAIN counter enabled: 32b->64b CHAIN counter was incremented and overflow > > > > Is this related to [1]? > > > > M. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315110725.1215523-1-eric.auger@redhat.com > > Yes please let me know if it fixes your issue. I also tried bisection > but it did not lead to anything. FWIW, that worked for me; I replied there with a Tested-by (and test results). Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel