From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5A6C77B7E for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 05:43:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cdCfpRcEotkkMmIIdBZZyURK4g3bSzPwLjN5hupsAIA=; b=LNyZBQpjinlWu6 mssUNe/hkYfEi+8KSLFWni9l77jFicT4SdRmkE5F+/kC2BVw9fW1cViqpTS2aFbOvMwZn4n5xXzIE sYzAhfk6CQf+LmrQvSZDU+TrZ42ZRi6hAUiHjk5f/F4PHM+7IerXe/fmubi1JSoNjVvjNHse4C31g zB/0l2RM0qFZbMQl6eROEd7lMu3rYbasM301ADT7wx9xS//j8mjbaEMoaO08JZNYcwMlFBYNMbWCW KV4wc59ZBo0ocL8Gz25/TkDF1PSNY8sHNr8MdOy0zCeSNiW7a6SgCZFE/5hp/bZEPxQLmjdEjVCta FZ+VMMemL0B7Htq5Qr+g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ptimn-000EAk-2v; Tue, 02 May 2023 05:42:49 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ptimm-000E9w-05 for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Tue, 02 May 2023 05:42:48 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=C2mbpKRY/IaHURPbi8xdkp6Ux75t8HAEwDPxIJfytoY=; b=GRdXgF761szqEg4CNDG4iJrg9J 11VvbbAcKWkw5/si6IQ33s0lRm6p934RNt6ht80jxpr9YqgUctKtFZGheNbZfMKA/Ryn8lDiQ/V+/ IyKWMGIN6GkWysc+kNfWIu2Zwj3dIKdxFDuK8Rv/IV8DcdndRxXQiH/klbsJHeznHjIVqR17XlikS RxXqlsh8nAshh3vAfXGz+quiKjziRZFbz541IK30e6WgZUngPrHjyAsx2KBAlyGsb6ggq/S2lYbZK pNeyk6KwFW574wOsk1xL0q+BsEKBG2ebPp4diJXZEA/u4NMfPZ1Wu5qDlDdzZS0iKEegEdc5YJB0s cUH9/zcg==; Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ptc35-00F21d-0x for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 May 2023 22:31:14 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-24df161f84bso1342064a91.3 for ; Mon, 01 May 2023 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1682980266; x=1685572266; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=C2mbpKRY/IaHURPbi8xdkp6Ux75t8HAEwDPxIJfytoY=; b=MydnFHypJbySOooSNZ9ETF/1six5mxjw+FHQ/I0otqcS1LXMwfEvVXYaQ84i5fkAHQ mIOXyOYXsS53MNOAMHN4W27MqHBITLQpmtr6GE+UoofZVIPqMfrC+P0l+HJ2maZ6YrjK xoTJuPWVM8p8d4jiwCPNIeWShoFKXuKJWx0D9Vq59m6C/IvKIhEKDjWfXzIADkq3GEiN HEX62ptt5RPbRgwl49ncfXRC26rWw1WJVdblIw4dFUE0+PJB/VyOnrnCV/TeaP6Iz1np 6z2bPR/6HNftXXyudyR7nKPh0CxerIyZg6TsNLxxmbqeV8KV4yKCdUlBOj/AhOacGO2P Xttw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682980266; x=1685572266; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=C2mbpKRY/IaHURPbi8xdkp6Ux75t8HAEwDPxIJfytoY=; b=LktAg55Lz6WckdCGL6daJapO2qH4ZaRz/z1d2/nZS5MOvvz3eyOMS6IKEaOn/hfWsL 6jFMHgA3vr2EeAUA0iVL8RGIYe/c4DD7hFFtAa4VNfAu6lzQauJ/s/lZuPYi2RWUUWpw a4g8Tsxo9hAy5ZZTy5ynbFXfN4yw6dekHbFrpHm2nRqGenX+G7ldEe8x/roRyn91/z60 6YPuuzP5QnQsD2ZQ1oMHS1F+sYJjDskZSiFAHw0qDeoV+UuICYFyYp1pbjxmFzXsV53s T0R5gJs5lPNh9I7l3p6MgnCov5fH/IIQxA5CxOKkSEmjOJvqoblVBSDIwlGvDSqWSgeD 9frw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyPoyq6Oyiueeaa6nt74ZrBKx8Fly7fVt6eR1thzMCbWieaD0EE B4FbOEHQ3UWCiQgmjXyftVzI+Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4pCZfkOETLVMCNCYFPb2sUFVmgge5RUxvMRnpMtAoB0d+G3DquSEMud4Mw95ryPYROdal3lg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bd02:b0:23d:1143:c664 with SMTP id y2-20020a17090abd0200b0023d1143c664mr15870863pjr.31.1682980266099; Mon, 01 May 2023 15:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:2609:c92d:9942:6f79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gw13-20020a17090b0a4d00b002470b9503desm19672979pjb.55.2023.05.01.15.31.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 May 2023 15:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 16:31:03 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Tinghan Shen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP Message-ID: References: <20230426091211.21557-1-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> <20230426091211.21557-7-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230426091211.21557-7-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230501_233111_556321_8F4AEF8A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 37.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 05:12:06PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote: > The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is > the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP > driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes > to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP. > > Add the remoteproc instances for single-core SCP and multi-core SCP to > the new added SCP cluster list. When the SCP driver is removed, it > cleanup resources by walking through the cluster list. > > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen > --- > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h | 3 + > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > index c0905aec3b4b..b73b60c22ea1 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h > @@ -128,6 +128,9 @@ struct mtk_scp { > size_t dram_size; > > struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev; > + > + struct list_head elem; > + struct list_head *cluster; > }; > > /** > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > index 5e4982f4d5dc..0b052b0acf2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_cluster { > void __iomem *l1tcm_base; > size_t l1tcm_size; > phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys; > + struct list_head mtk_scp_cluster; > }; > > /** > @@ -862,21 +863,31 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp) > } > } > > -static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > +static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *cluster_pdev, > + struct platform_device *core_pdev, > + const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data) > { > - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > - struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *of_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + struct device *dev; > + struct device_node *np; > + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *of_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(cluster_pdev); > struct mtk_scp *scp; > struct rproc *rproc; > struct resource *res; > const char *fw_name = "scp.img"; > int ret, i; > > + if (core_pdev) > + pdev = core_pdev; > + else > + pdev = cluster_pdev; After following my comment from the previous patch, there won't be a need to do this. > + > + dev = &pdev->dev; > ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name); > if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) > return ret; > > + np = dev->of_node; > rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp)); > if (!rproc) > return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n"); > @@ -884,7 +895,7 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > scp = rproc->priv; > scp->rproc = rproc; > scp->dev = dev; > - scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + scp->data = of_data; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp); > > scp->reg_base = of_cluster->reg_base; > @@ -934,10 +945,6 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto remove_subdev; > } > > - ret = rproc_add(rproc); > - if (ret) > - goto remove_subdev; > - > return 0; > > remove_subdev: > @@ -952,6 +959,121 @@ static int scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > return ret; > } > > +static void scp_rproc_free(struct mtk_scp *scp) > +{ > + int i; > + > + scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp); > + scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT); > + scp_unmap_memory_region(scp); > + for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++) > + mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock); > + mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock); > +} > + > +static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev); > + struct device_node *child; > + > + child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL); > + if (!child) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n"); > + > + of_node_put(child); > + return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg"); > +} > + > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev); > + struct platform_device *cpdev; > + struct device_node *child; > + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *of_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data; > + struct list_head *cluster = &of_cluster->mtk_scp_cluster; > + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp; > + int core_id = 0; > + int ret; > + > + ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (ret) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "single-core scp\n"); > + > + /* When using the SCP node phandle on exported SCP APIs, the drvdata > + * is expected to be the mtk_scp object, and as a result, it is intended > + * to be overwritten for single-core SCP usage. > + */ > + ret = scp_rproc_init(pdev, NULL, of_device_get_match_data(dev)); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize single-core scp\n"); > + > + scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster); > + scp->cluster = cluster; > + } else { > + dev_dbg(dev, "multi-core scp\n"); > + > + cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + > + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) { > + if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + > + cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child); > + if (!cpdev) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + > + ret = scp_rproc_init(pdev, cpdev, cluster_of_data[core_id]); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id); > + put_device(&cpdev->dev); > + of_node_put(child); > + goto init_fail; > + } > + scp = platform_get_drvdata(cpdev); > + list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster); > + scp->cluster = cluster; > + put_device(&cpdev->dev); > + > + core_id++; > + } > + } > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc); > + if (ret) > + goto add_fail; > + } > + > + return 0; > + > +add_fail: > + list_for_each_entry_continue(scp, cluster, elem) { > + rproc_del(scp->rproc); > + } > +init_fail: > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + list_del(&scp->elem); > + scp_rproc_free(scp); > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > @@ -983,23 +1105,44 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > of_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start; > } > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&of_cluster->mtk_scp_cluster); > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, of_cluster); > > - return scp_rproc_init(pdev); > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n"); > + > + ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev); > + if (ret) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize scp cluster\n"); > + > + return 0; > } > > static int scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > - struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - int i; > + struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp; > + struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *of_cluster; > + struct list_head *cluster; > + int ret; > > - rproc_del(scp->rproc); > - scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp); > - scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT); > - scp_unmap_memory_region(scp); > - for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++) > - mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock); > - mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock); > + ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (ret) { > + scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + cluster = scp->cluster; > + } else { > + of_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + cluster = &of_cluster->mtk_scp_cluster; > + } If single and multi core systems were presented the same way, i.e with a cluster and a list of SCPs, you wouldn't have to do this. I will stop here for this revision. Thanks, Mathieu > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) { > + list_del(&scp->elem); > + rproc_del(scp->rproc); > + scp_rproc_free(scp); > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -1078,12 +1221,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = { > .host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT, > }; > > +static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = { > + &mt8195_of_data, > + &mt8195_of_data_c1, > + NULL > +}; > + > static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data }, > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data }, > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores }, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match); > -- > 2.18.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel