From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20458C77B7C for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 09:27:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ssgzaAC7OOs3QgsD/M0HuUgZjC3x0vHoklsqxToFwtw=; b=HhVHMIyxhO0PKv +4OlS42k/h3i3GPDu/SFUwChp8+4Pr9OnHg1fKvx2co/DI/lJKw8pyIN3pXZprAngYpV5Wm8L59QP lLj3zLl/okbahIwi27SZ2mys3OBYUQBBsF+i6edIrC2gkvzxAvdBGOGsreRZ6XsjRkjjtYq7J03Vj 4+v2wm2HKVNiBfyODh/y12UVOm4QWBgxSDklotEviKXYUrCyJSoxIqjxzVkuCWvK36tkedGRUStMR EOmE8N1YAjrB1mRWEJh6rylad77gm9HHMm1DiyxpH8LuFXa8IJ6t4oS/Km/b2s/ciJYj6Ksfs05WX vozWTjIWVhVwh5YlznyQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1puriG-00A8TL-2T; Fri, 05 May 2023 09:26:52 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1puriE-00A8S2-0y; Fri, 05 May 2023 09:26:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C921B63CB3; Fri, 5 May 2023 09:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DD03C433EF; Fri, 5 May 2023 09:26:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1683278809; bh=cbv7KqFW3EZCwbXiqh1UsSQZA6Dm577W9BTUAcRYjjs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YR3ygV1n/WztmQPmypSDHPmCE21+CNyWvFvgd7VAxyi6F+rg2w9GATY0uAdZgQVtQ 4DPVLjOoqN7CfvpJbD/WKRzabu5rhGp9Ppyle//dCD6ZUck8fN4WD5pnVHIojEd4M1 RPonfvoC1x1T+xazjxm6SoE1dCKqLnakzXLmrRFOmOf26GwBTBQpPVLaElgsJL/ZSi pHIMDgKZTCqpYQVw4qNT9bd4UUuXeZTlP0WCglUiZa8inC1NcroG6UffZRwk2ttqP8 WkF1rPZuz9M7bs8RcKyQ0YcSif40FX9PoP9WEPwGNBcIIt57hNTMxlug7WQ/Jiriuo E7sWXyesn59lA== Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 14:56:44 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Guillaume Ranquet Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu , Philipp Zabel , Chunfeng Yun , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix mtk-hdmi-mt8195 unitialized variable usage and clock rate calculation Message-ID: References: <20230413-fixes-for-mt8195-hdmi-phy-v1-0-b8482458df0d@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230413-fixes-for-mt8195-hdmi-phy-v1-0-b8482458df0d@baylibre.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230505_022650_374003_12DD9EAA X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.73 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 13-04-23, 14:46, Guillaume Ranquet wrote: > I've received a report from kernel test report [1] that a variable was used > unitialized in the mtk8195 hdmi phy code. > > I've upon fixing that issue found out that the clock rate calculation > was erroneous since the calculus was moved to div_u64. Applied both, thanks -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel