linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	John Ogness <jogness@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/vmalloc.c: change _vm_unmap_aliases() to do purge firstly
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 20:03:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGdlff80rZ6v4LNO@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87edng6qu8.ffs@tglx>

After vb_free() invocation, the va will be purged and put into purge
tree/list if the entire vmap_block is dirty. If not entirely dirty, the
vmap_block is still in percpu vmap_block_queue list, just like below two
graphs:

(1)
  |-----|------------|-----------|-------|
  |dirty|still mapped|   dirty   | free  |

2)
  |------------------------------|-------|
  |         dirty                | free  |

In the current _vm_unmap_aliases(), to reclaim those unmapped range and
flush, it will iterate percpu vbq to calculate the range from vmap_block
like above two cases. Then call purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus()
to purge the vmap_block in case 2 since no mapping exists right now,
and put these purged vmap_block va into purge tree/list. Then in
__purge_vmap_area_lazy(), it will continue calculating the flush range
from purge list. Obviously, this will take vmap_block va in the 2nd case
into account twice.

So here just move purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus() up to purge the
vmap_block va of case 2 firstly, then only need iterate and count in
the dirty range in above 1st case. With the change, counting in the
dirty region of vmap_block in 1st case is now inside vmap_purge_lock
protection region, which makes the flush range calculation more
reasonable and accurate by avoiding concurrent operation in other cpu.

And also rename _vm_unmap_aliases() to vm_unmap_aliases(), since no
other caller except of the old vm_unmap_aliases().

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 87134dd8abc3..9f7cbd6182ad 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2236,8 +2236,23 @@ static void vb_free(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 		spin_unlock(&vb->lock);
 }
 
-static void _vm_unmap_aliases(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flush)
+/**
+ * vm_unmap_aliases - unmap outstanding lazy aliases in the vmap layer
+ *
+ * The vmap/vmalloc layer lazily flushes kernel virtual mappings primarily
+ * to amortize TLB flushing overheads. What this means is that any page you
+ * have now, may, in a former life, have been mapped into kernel virtual
+ * address by the vmap layer and so there might be some CPUs with TLB entries
+ * still referencing that page (additional to the regular 1:1 kernel mapping).
+ *
+ * vm_unmap_aliases flushes all such lazy mappings. After it returns, we can
+ * be sure that none of the pages we have control over will have any aliases
+ * from the vmap layer.
+ */
+void vm_unmap_aliases(void)
 {
+	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
+	bool flush = false;
 	int cpu;
 
 	if (unlikely(!vmap_initialized))
@@ -2245,6 +2260,9 @@ static void _vm_unmap_aliases(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flush)
 
 	might_sleep();
 
+	mutex_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
+	purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
+
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct vmap_block_queue *vbq = &per_cpu(vmap_block_queue, cpu);
 		struct vmap_block *vb;
@@ -2262,40 +2280,17 @@ static void _vm_unmap_aliases(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flush)
 				start = min(s, start);
 				end   = max(e, end);
 
-				flush = 1;
+				flush = true;
 			}
 			spin_unlock(&vb->lock);
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&vmap_purge_lock);
-	purge_fragmented_blocks_allcpus();
 	if (!__purge_vmap_area_lazy(start, end) && flush)
 		flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
 	mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
 }
-
-/**
- * vm_unmap_aliases - unmap outstanding lazy aliases in the vmap layer
- *
- * The vmap/vmalloc layer lazily flushes kernel virtual mappings primarily
- * to amortize TLB flushing overheads. What this means is that any page you
- * have now, may, in a former life, have been mapped into kernel virtual
- * address by the vmap layer and so there might be some CPUs with TLB entries
- * still referencing that page (additional to the regular 1:1 kernel mapping).
- *
- * vm_unmap_aliases flushes all such lazy mappings. After it returns, we can
- * be sure that none of the pages we have control over will have any aliases
- * from the vmap layer.
- */
-void vm_unmap_aliases(void)
-{
-	unsigned long start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0;
-	int flush = 0;
-
-	_vm_unmap_aliases(start, end, flush);
-}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vm_unmap_aliases);
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-19 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15 16:43 Excessive TLB flush ranges Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 16:59 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-15 19:46   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 21:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-15 21:31       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16  6:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  6:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:27               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16  9:03                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16 10:05                   ` Baoquan He
2023-05-16 14:21                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16 19:03                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17  9:38                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 10:52                           ` Baoquan He
2023-05-19 11:22                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 11:49                               ` Baoquan He
2023-05-19 14:13                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 12:01                         ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm/vmalloc.c: try to flush vmap_area one by one Baoquan He
2023-05-19 14:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 12:02                         ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/vmalloc.c: Only flush VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS area immediately Baoquan He
2023-05-19 12:03                         ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-05-19 14:17                           ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/vmalloc.c: change _vm_unmap_aliases() to do purge firstly Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 18:38                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 23:46                             ` Baoquan He
2023-05-21 23:10                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-22 11:21                                 ` Baoquan He
2023-05-22 12:02                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-22 14:34                                     ` Baoquan He
2023-05-22 20:21                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-22 20:44                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-23  9:35                                         ` Baoquan He
2023-05-19 13:49                   ` Excessive TLB flush ranges Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:21             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16  8:19           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16  8:44             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:48               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16 12:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16 13:42                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-16 14:38                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16 15:01                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-16 17:04                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 11:26                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-17 11:58                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 12:15                               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-17 16:32                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 10:01                                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-19 14:56                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 15:14                                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-19 16:32                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-19 17:02                                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-16 17:56                       ` Nadav Amit
2023-05-16 19:32                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17  0:23                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17  1:23                             ` Nadav Amit
2023-05-17 10:31                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 11:47                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 22:41                                   ` Nadav Amit
2023-05-17 14:43                                 ` Mark Rutland
2023-05-17 16:41                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 22:57                                 ` Nadav Amit
2023-05-19 11:49                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-17 12:12                               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-17 23:14                                 ` Nadav Amit
2023-05-15 18:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-05-16  2:26   ` Baoquan He
2023-05-16  6:40     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:07       ` Baoquan He
2023-05-16  8:10         ` Baoquan He
2023-05-16  8:45         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-05-16  9:13           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  8:54         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-16  9:48           ` Baoquan He
2023-05-15 20:02 ` Nadav Amit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZGdlff80rZ6v4LNO@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).