[PATCH v13 00/11] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core

[PATCH v13 00/11] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core

[Tinghan Shen]

The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a 
single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st 
core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support 
to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.

v12 -> v13:
1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7 
2. add review tag to patchset 3
3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11

v11 -> v12:
1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow 
5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7 
6. remove patchset 7 review tag  

v10 -> v11:
1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
   platform data property to the driver data property 
3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7

v9 -> v10:
1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
2. remove an unnecessary if() condition

v8 -> v9:
1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11 
2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks

v7 -> v8:
1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
2. squash register definitions into driver patches
3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11 

v6 -> v7:
1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
   at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch

v5 -> v6:
1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'

v4 -> v5:
1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation 
2. fix dual-core watchdog handling

v3 -> v4:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation

v2 -> v3:
1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
5. refine IPI error message

v1 -> v2:
1. update dt-binding property description
2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c


Tinghan Shen (11):
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
    definition
  arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
  remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP
  remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers
    operations
  remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
  remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
  remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
  arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core

 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++++-
 .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  32 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  26 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 425 ++++++++++++++++--
 7 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition

[Tinghan Shen]

Improve the definition of the rpmsg subnode by
assigning a distinct node name and adding the
definition source of node properties.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 31 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 895415772d1d..271081df0e46 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ properties:
   memory-region:
     maxItems: 1
 
+  cros-ec-rpmsg:
+    $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+    description:
+      This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+      of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+      the rpmsg devices.
+
+    required:
+      - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -89,21 +101,7 @@ allOf:
         reg-names:
           maxItems: 2
 
-additionalProperties:
-  type: object
-  description:
-    Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
-    are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the
-    individual bindings for the rpmsg devices.
-  properties:
-    mediatek,rpmsg-name:
-      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
-      description:
-        Contains the name for the rpmsg device. Used to match
-        the subnode to rpmsg device announced by SCP.
-
-  required:
-    - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+additionalProperties: false
 
 examples:
   - |
@@ -118,7 +116,8 @@ examples:
         clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_SCPSYS>;
         clock-names = "main";
 
-        cros_ec {
+        cros-ec-rpmsg {
+            compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 01/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode definition

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> Improve the definition of the rpmsg subnode by
> assigning a distinct node name and adding the
> definition source of node properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 02/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode

[Tinghan Shen]

Align the node name with the definition in SCP bindings.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
index 6ce16a265e05..34076ba28fd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
@@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros_ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
index 0e8b34117090..1bbc994bc109 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&scp_pins>;
 
-	cros-ec {
+	cros-ec-rpmsg {
 		compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
 		mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
 	};
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 03/11] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP

[Tinghan Shen]

Extend the SCP binding to describe the MT8195 dual-core SCP.

Under different applications, the MT8195 SCP can be used as single-core
or dual-core. This change keeps the single-core definitions and
adds new definitions for the dual-core use case.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 271081df0e46..09102dda4942 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
       - mediatek,mt8188-scp
       - mediatek,mt8192-scp
       - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+      - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
 
   reg:
     description:
@@ -31,10 +32,7 @@ properties:
 
   reg-names:
     minItems: 2
-    items:
-      - const: sram
-      - const: cfg
-      - const: l1tcm
+    maxItems: 3
 
   clocks:
     description:
@@ -70,6 +68,81 @@ properties:
 
     unevaluatedProperties: false
 
+  '#address-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  '#size-cells':
+    const: 1
+
+  ranges:
+    description:
+      Standard ranges definition providing address translations for
+      local SCP SRAM address spaces to bus addresses.
+
+patternProperties:
+  "^scp@[a-f0-9]+$":
+    type: object
+    description:
+      The MediaTek SCP integrated to SoC might be a multi-core version.
+      The other cores are represented as child nodes of the boot core.
+      There are some integration differences for the IP like the usage of
+      address translator for translating SoC bus addresses into address space
+      for the processor.
+
+      Each SCP core has own cache memory. The SRAM and L1TCM are shared by
+      cores. The power of cache, SRAM and L1TCM power should be enabled
+      before booting SCP cores. The size of cache, SRAM, and L1TCM are varied
+      on differnt SoCs.
+
+      The SCP cores do not use an MMU, but has a set of registers to
+      control the translations between 32-bit CPU addresses into system bus
+      addresses. Cache and memory access settings are provided through a
+      Memory Protection Unit (MPU), programmable only from the SCP.
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        enum:
+          - mediatek,scp-core
+
+      reg:
+        description: The base address and size of SRAM.
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      reg-names:
+        const: sram
+
+      interrupts:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      firmware-name:
+        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
+        description:
+          If present, name (or relative path) of the file within the
+          firmware search path containing the firmware image used when
+          initializing sub cores of multi-core SCP.
+
+      memory-region:
+        maxItems: 1
+
+      cros-ec-rpmsg:
+        $ref: /schemas/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+        description:
+          This subnode represents the rpmsg device. The properties
+          of this node are defined by the individual bindings for
+          the rpmsg devices.
+
+        required:
+          - mediatek,rpmsg-name
+
+        unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
+      - reg
+      - reg-names
+
+    additionalProperties: false
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg
@@ -99,7 +172,37 @@ allOf:
         reg:
           maxItems: 2
         reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8192-scp
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
+          maxItems: 3
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: sram
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          enum:
+            - mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual
+    then:
+      properties:
+        reg:
           maxItems: 2
+        reg-names:
+          items:
+            - const: cfg
+            - const: l1tcm
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
@@ -121,3 +224,37 @@ examples:
             mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
         };
     };
+
+  - |
+    scp@10500000 {
+        compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+        reg = <0x10720000 0xe0000>,
+              <0x10700000 0x8000>;
+        reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+        ranges = <0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
+
+        scp@0 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+
+        scp@a0000 {
+            compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+            reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+            reg-names = "sram";
+
+            cros-ec-rpmsg {
+                compatible = "google,cros-ec-rpmsg";
+                mediatek,rpmsg-name = "cros-ec-rpmsg";
+            };
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 04/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations

[Tinghan Shen]

The SCP rproc driver has a set of chip dependent callbacks for
boot sequence and IRQ handling. Implement these callbacks for MT8195
SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  9 ++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index ea6fa1100a00..c0905aec3b4b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #define MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR		0x4094
 #define MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET		0x4098
 #define MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT		BIT(0)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT	BIT(4)
 
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR	0x10000
 #define MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET	0x10004
@@ -56,6 +57,14 @@
 
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
+#define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET		0x4088
+#define MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR		0x408C
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
+#define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
+#define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index dcc94ee2458d..d66822dad943 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -176,6 +176,16 @@ static void mt8192_scp_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_CLR);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET);
+}
+
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8183_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -212,6 +222,18 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT)
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SSHUB2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t scp_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = priv;
@@ -453,6 +475,19 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* hold SCP in reset while loading FW. */
+	scp->data->scp_reset_assert(scp);
+
+	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
+	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int scp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -625,6 +660,15 @@ static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_c1_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	/* Power off CPU SRAM */
+	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
+
+	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
+	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG);
+}
+
 static int scp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -989,6 +1033,18 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
+	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
+	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_c1_before_load,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler,
+	.scp_reset_assert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_assert,
+	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8195_scp_c1_reset_deassert,
+	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_c1_stop,
+	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
+	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
+	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[Tinghan Shen]

This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
redundant code.

Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
are,
- the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
  the platofmr device driver data property.
- save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
- In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
  the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
  pointers to the platform device platform data property.

The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 	size_t dram_size;
 
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
+
+	struct list_head elem;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
 #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
 #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
 
+struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
+	void __iomem *reg_base;
+	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
+	size_t l1tcm_size;
+	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
+	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
+};
+
 /**
  * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
  *
@@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
+	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
 
@@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
 			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
 {
-	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
 }
 
 static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
 {
-	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
 
 	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
 }
@@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
 static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
 			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
 {
-	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
 
 	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
 }
@@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
-static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
 	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
-	if (!rproc)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+	if (!rproc) {
+		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
 
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
 	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
+	platform_device_add_data(pdev, &scp, sizeof(scp));
+
+	scp->reg_base = scp_cluster->reg_base;
+	scp->l1tcm_base = scp_cluster->l1tcm_base;
+	scp->l1tcm_size = scp_cluster->l1tcm_size;
+	scp->l1tcm_phys = scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys;
 
 	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
 	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base));
+	}
 
 	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
 	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
 
-	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
-	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
-	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
-		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
-			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
-		}
-	} else {
-		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
-		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
-	}
-
-	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
-	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
-				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
-
 	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
 	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
 	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
@@ -939,11 +938,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto remove_subdev;
 	}
 
-	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
-	if (ret)
-		goto remove_subdev;
-
-	return 0;
+	return scp;
 
 remove_subdev:
 	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
@@ -954,15 +949,13 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 
-	return ret;
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
-static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
-	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	int i;
 
-	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
 	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
 	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
 	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
@@ -971,6 +964,82 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 }
 
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp))
+		return PTR_ERR(scp);
+
+	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
+		scp_free(scp);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
+	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
+
+	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!scp_cluster)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cfg");
+	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
+				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
+
+	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
+	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
+		if (ret != -EINVAL)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
+
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
+	} else {
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
+		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
+	}
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp_cluster);
+
+	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
+}
+
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
 	.scp_clk_get = mt8183_scp_clk_get,
 	.scp_before_load = mt8183_scp_before_load,
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
> The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
> single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
> redundant code.
> 
> Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
> concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
> are,
> - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
>    the platofmr device driver data property.

s/platofmr/platform/g

> - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
> - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
>    the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
>    pointers to the platform device platform data property.
> 
> The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
> SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>   	size_t dram_size;
>   
>   	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> +
> +	struct list_head elem;
>   };
>   
>   /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
>   #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
>   #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
>   
> +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> +};
> +
>   /**
>    * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
>    *
> @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		return NULL;
>   	}
>   
> -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
> +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
>   
> @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>   static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
>   			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
>   {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>   
>   	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
>   }
>   
>   static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>   {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>   
>   	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
>   }
> @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>   static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
>   			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
>   {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>   
>   	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
>   }
> @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>   	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   
>   	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
>   	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> -		return ret;
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>   
>   	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> -	if (!rproc)
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> +	if (!rproc) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

Why are you converting those dev_err_probe to dev_err->return?!

Regards,
Angelo


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)]

Hi Angelo,

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 09:43 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> > This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
> > The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
> > single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
> > redundant code.
> > 
> > Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
> > concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
> > are,
> > - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
> >    the platofmr device driver data property.
> 
> s/platofmr/platform/g
> 
> > - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
> > - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
> >    the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
> >    pointers to the platform device platform data property.
> > 
> > The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
> > SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
> >   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >   2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
> >   	size_t dram_size;
> >   
> >   	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> > +
> > +	struct list_head elem;
> >   };
> >   
> >   /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
> >   #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
> >   #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
> >   
> > +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> > +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> > +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> > +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> > +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> > +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> > +};
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
> >    *
> > @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   		return NULL;
> >   	}
> >   
> > -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
> > +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
> >   
> > @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >   static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
> >   			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
> >   {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >   
> >   	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
> >   }
> >   
> >   static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> >   {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >   
> >   	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
> >   }
> > @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> >   static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
> >   			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
> >   {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >   
> >   	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
> >   }
> > @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >   	}
> >   }
> >   
> > -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> >   {
> >   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >   	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   
> >   	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> >   	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >   
> >   	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> > -	if (!rproc)
> > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > +	if (!rproc) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 
> Why are you converting those dev_err_probe to dev_err->return?!
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo

It's because the return type of this function changed from "int" to "struct mtk_scp *".
Maybe I should change them to "ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(...))" ?

-- 
Best regards,
TingHan
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 10:00, TingHan Shen (沈廷翰) ha scritto:
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 09:43 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
>>> This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
>>> The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
>>> single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
>>> redundant code.
>>>
>>> Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
>>> concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
>>> are,
>>> - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
>>>     the platofmr device driver data property.
>>
>> s/platofmr/platform/g
>>
>>> - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
>>> - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
>>>     the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
>>>     pointers to the platform device platform data property.
>>>
>>> The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
>>> SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
>>>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>    2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
>>> index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
>>> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>>>    	size_t dram_size;
>>>    
>>>    	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
>>> +
>>> +	struct list_head elem;
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    /**
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>>> index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
>>>    #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
>>>    #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
>>>    
>>> +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
>>> +	void __iomem *reg_base;
>>> +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
>>> +	size_t l1tcm_size;
>>> +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
>>> +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>    /**
>>>     * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
>>>     *
>>> @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    		return NULL;
>>>    	}
>>>    
>>> -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
>>> +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
>>>    
>>> @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>>>    static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
>>>    			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>>>    
>>>    	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>>>    
>>>    	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
>>>    }
>>> @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>>>    static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
>>>    			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
>>>    {
>>> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>>>    
>>>    	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
>>>    }
>>> @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>>>    	}
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>> +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>    	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>> @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    
>>>    	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
>>>    	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
>>> -		return ret;
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>    
>>>    	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
>>> -	if (!rproc)
>>> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>>> +	if (!rproc) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> Why are you converting those dev_err_probe to dev_err->return?!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Angelo
> 
> It's because the return type of this function changed from "int" to "struct mtk_scp *".
> Maybe I should change them to "ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(...))" ?
> 

Oh, sorry - you're right. No, it's fine as you did it.

Cheers


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:22:16PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
> The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
> single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
> redundant code.
> 
> Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
> concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
> are,
> - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
>   the platofmr device driver data property.
> - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
> - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
>   the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
>   pointers to the platform device platform data property.
> 
> The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
> SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>  	size_t dram_size;
>  
>  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> +
> +	struct list_head elem;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
>  #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
>  #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
>  
> +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
>   *
> @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
> +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
>  
> @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
>  			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
>  }
> @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
>  static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
>  			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>  
>  	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
>  }
> @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> -		return ret;
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
>  	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> -	if (!rproc)
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> +	if (!rproc) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
>  
>  	scp = rproc->priv;
>  	scp->rproc = rproc;
>  	scp->dev = dev;
>  	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> +	platform_device_add_data(pdev, &scp, sizeof(scp));
> +
> +	scp->reg_base = scp_cluster->reg_base;
> +	scp->l1tcm_base = scp_cluster->l1tcm_base;
> +	scp->l1tcm_size = scp_cluster->l1tcm_size;
> +	scp->l1tcm_phys = scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys;
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
>  	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> -				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> +		return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base));

Can you spot what is wrong here?

> +	}
>  
>  	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
>  	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
>  
> -	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> -	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> -	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> -		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> -			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> -		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> -	}
> -
> -	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> -	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> -				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> -
>  	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
>  	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  
>  	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
> @@ -939,11 +938,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto remove_subdev;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto remove_subdev;
> -
> -	return 0;
> +	return scp;
>  
>  remove_subdev:
>  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> @@ -954,15 +949,13 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
>  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  }
>  
> -static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
> -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
>  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
>  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
>  	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
> @@ -971,6 +964,82 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
>  }
>  
> +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp))
> +		return PTR_ERR(scp);
> +
> +	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
> +		scp_free(scp);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!scp_cluster)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cfg");
> +	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
> +				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> +
> +	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> +	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
> +		if (ret != -EINVAL)
> +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> +
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
> +	} else {
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> +	}
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp_cluster);
> +
> +	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
> +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> +		scp_free(scp);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
>  	.scp_clk_get = mt8183_scp_clk_get,
>  	.scp_before_load = mt8183_scp_before_load,
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)]

Hi Mathieu,

On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:22:16PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> > This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
> > The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
> > single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
> > redundant code.
> > 
> > Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
> > concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
> > are,
> > - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
> >   the platofmr device driver data property.
> > - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
> > - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
> >   the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
> >   pointers to the platform device platform data property.
> > 
> > The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
> > SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
> >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
> >  	size_t dram_size;
> >  
> >  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> > +
> > +	struct list_head elem;
> >  };
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
> >  #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
> >  #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
> >  
> > +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> > +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> > +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> > +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> > +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> > +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> > +};
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
> >   *
> > @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
> > +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
> >  
> > @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
> >  			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
> >  {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >  
> >  	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> >  {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >  
> >  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
> >  }
> > @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> >  static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
> >  			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
> >  {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> >  
> >  	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
> >  }
> > @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> >  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  
> >  	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> > -	if (!rproc)
> > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > +	if (!rproc) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	scp = rproc->priv;
> >  	scp->rproc = rproc;
> >  	scp->dev = dev;
> >  	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> > +	platform_device_add_data(pdev, &scp, sizeof(scp));
> > +
> > +	scp->reg_base = scp_cluster->reg_base;
> > +	scp->l1tcm_base = scp_cluster->l1tcm_base;
> > +	scp->l1tcm_size = scp_cluster->l1tcm_size;
> > +	scp->l1tcm_phys = scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys;
> >  
> >  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> >  	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> > -				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> > +		return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base));
> 
> Can you spot what is wrong here?

After look around of the header, I thought that I should use the ERR_CAST instead.
It fix the sparse warning and prevent the weired double type casting.
If this is ok, I will fix it this way in the next version.


Best regards,
TingHan

> 
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
> >  	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
> >  
> > -	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> > -	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> > -	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> > -		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> > -		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> > -			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> > -		}
> > -	} else {
> > -		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> > -		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> > -				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> > -
> >  	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  
> >  	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  
> >  	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
> >  	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
> > @@ -939,11 +938,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		goto remove_subdev;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		goto remove_subdev;
> > -
> > -	return 0;
> > +	return scp;
> >  
> >  remove_subdev:
> >  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> > @@ -954,15 +949,13 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> >  
> > -	return ret;
> > +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> >  {
> > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> >  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> >  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
> >  	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
> > @@ -971,6 +964,82 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(scp))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(scp);
> > +
> > +	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
> > +		scp_free(scp);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
> > +	struct resource *res;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!scp_cluster)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cfg");
> > +	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
> > +				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> > +
> > +	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> > +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> > +	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
> > +		if (ret != -EINVAL)
> > +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> > +
> > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
> > +	} else {
> > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > +
> > +	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
> > +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> > +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> > +		scp_free(scp);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
> >  	.scp_clk_get = mt8183_scp_clk_get,
> >  	.scp_before_load = mt8183_scp_before_load,
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 05/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 08:13:18AM +0000, TingHan Shen (沈廷翰) wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 11:25 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:22:16PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> > > This is the preliminary step for probing multi-core SCP.
> > > The initialization procedure for remoteproc is similar for both
> > > single-core and multi-core architectures and is reusing to avoid
> > > redundant code.
> > > 
> > > Rewrite the probing flow of single-core SCP to adapt with the 'cluster'
> > > concept needed by probing the multi-core SCP. The main differences
> > > are,
> > > - the SCP core object(s) is maintained at the cluster list instead of at
> > >   the platofmr device driver data property.
> > > - save the cluster information at the platofmr device driver data property.
> > > - In order to keep the compatibility of exported SCP APIs which getting
> > >   the SCP core object by SCP node phandle, move the SCP core object
> > >   pointers to the platform device platform data property.
> > > 
> > > The registers of config and l1tcm are shared for multi-core
> > > SCP. Reuse the mapped addresses for all cores.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   2 +
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > >  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > > index c0905aec3b4b..56395e8664cb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> > > @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ struct mtk_scp {
> > >  	size_t dram_size;
> > >  
> > >  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
> > > +
> > > +	struct list_head elem;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  /**
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > > index d66822dad943..c8fc6b46f82b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
> > >  #define MAX_CODE_SIZE 0x500000
> > >  #define SECTION_NAME_IPI_BUFFER ".ipi_buffer"
> > >  
> > > +struct mtk_scp_of_cluster {
> > > +	void __iomem *reg_base;
> > > +	void __iomem *l1tcm_base;
> > > +	size_t l1tcm_size;
> > > +	phys_addr_t l1tcm_phys;
> > > +	struct list_head mtk_scp_list;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * scp_get() - get a reference to SCP.
> > >   *
> > > @@ -51,7 +59,7 @@ struct mtk_scp *scp_get(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		return NULL;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	return platform_get_drvdata(scp_pdev);
> > > +	return *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&scp_pdev->dev);
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_get);
> > >  
> > > @@ -810,14 +818,14 @@ static void scp_unmap_memory_region(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> > >  static int scp_register_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id,
> > >  			    ipi_handler_t handler, void *priv)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > >  
> > >  	return scp_ipi_register(scp, id, handler, priv);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > >  
> > >  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, id);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -825,7 +833,7 @@ static void scp_unregister_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id)
> > >  static int scp_send_ipi(struct platform_device *pdev, u32 id, void *buf,
> > >  			unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct mtk_scp *scp = *(struct mtk_scp **)dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > >  
> > >  	return scp_ipi_send(scp, id, buf, len, wait);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -855,7 +863,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > +				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > @@ -867,52 +876,42 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  
> > >  	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> > >  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> > > -		return ret;
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >  
> > >  	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp));
> > > -	if (!rproc)
> > > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > > +	if (!rproc) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > >  	scp = rproc->priv;
> > >  	scp->rproc = rproc;
> > >  	scp->dev = dev;
> > >  	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp);
> > > +	platform_device_add_data(pdev, &scp, sizeof(scp));
> > > +
> > > +	scp->reg_base = scp_cluster->reg_base;
> > > +	scp->l1tcm_base = scp_cluster->l1tcm_base;
> > > +	scp->l1tcm_size = scp_cluster->l1tcm_size;
> > > +	scp->l1tcm_phys = scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys;
> > >  
> > >  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram");
> > >  	scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base))
> > > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base),
> > > -				     "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n");
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base));
> > 
> > Can you spot what is wrong here?
> 
> After look around of the header, I thought that I should use the ERR_CAST instead.
> It fix the sparse warning and prevent the weired double type casting.
> If this is ok, I will fix it this way in the next version.
>

Yes, the double casting is what got my attention.  ERR_CAST() was introduced to
address those kind of problems.

> 
> Best regards,
> TingHan
> 
> > 
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > >  	scp->sram_size = resource_size(res);
> > >  	scp->sram_phys = res->start;
> > >  
> > > -	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> > > -	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> > > -	scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) {
> > > -		ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base);
> > > -		if (ret != -EINVAL) {
> > > -			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> > > -		}
> > > -	} else {
> > > -		scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> > > -		scp->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > > -	scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg");
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base))
> > > -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base),
> > > -				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> > > -
> > >  	ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp);
> > >  	if (ret)
> > > -		return ret;
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >  
> > >  	ret = scp_map_memory_region(scp);
> > >  	if (ret)
> > > -		return ret;
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >  
> > >  	mutex_init(&scp->send_lock);
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
> > > @@ -939,11 +938,7 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		goto remove_subdev;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > > -	if (ret)
> > > -		goto remove_subdev;
> > > -
> > > -	return 0;
> > > +	return scp;
> > >  
> > >  remove_subdev:
> > >  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> > > @@ -954,15 +949,13 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> > >  
> > > -	return ret;
> > > +	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> > >  {
> > > -	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > >  	int i;
> > >  
> > > -	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> > >  	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
> > >  	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
> > >  	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
> > > @@ -971,6 +964,82 @@ static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
> > > +	struct mtk_scp *scp;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(scp))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(scp);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
> > > +		scp_free(scp);
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster;
> > > +	struct resource *res;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	scp_cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*scp_cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +	if (!scp_cluster)
> > > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cfg");
> > > +	scp_cluster->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base))
> > > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->reg_base),
> > > +				     "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n");
> > > +
> > > +	/* l1tcm is an optional memory region */
> > > +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm");
> > > +	scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base)) {
> > > +		ret = PTR_ERR(scp_cluster->l1tcm_base);
> > > +		if (ret != -EINVAL)
> > > +			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n");
> > > +
> > > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_base = NULL;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res);
> > > +		scp_cluster->l1tcm_phys = res->start;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
> > > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp_cluster);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
> > > +
> > > +	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list, elem) {
> > > +		list_del(&scp->elem);
> > > +		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
> > > +		scp_free(scp);
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8183_of_data = {
> > >  	.scp_clk_get = mt8183_scp_clk_get,
> > >  	.scp_before_load = mt8183_scp_before_load,
> > > -- 
> > > 2.18.0
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 06/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP

[Tinghan Shen]

The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.

Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
through the cluster list.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index c8fc6b46f82b..d644e232dfec 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -864,7 +864,8 @@ static void scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 }
 
 static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
-				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster)
+				      struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster,
+				      const struct mtk_scp_of_data *of_data)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -887,7 +888,7 @@ static struct mtk_scp *scp_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	scp = rproc->priv;
 	scp->rproc = rproc;
 	scp->dev = dev;
-	scp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	scp->data = of_data;
 	platform_device_add_data(pdev, &scp, sizeof(scp));
 
 	scp->reg_base = scp_cluster->reg_base;
@@ -964,14 +965,15 @@ static void scp_free(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
 }
 
-static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
 	struct mtk_scp *scp;
 	int ret;
 
-	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster);
+	scp = scp_rproc_init(pdev, scp_cluster, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
 	if (IS_ERR(scp))
 		return PTR_ERR(scp);
 
@@ -987,6 +989,100 @@ static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct platform_device *cpdev;
+	struct device_node *child;
+	struct mtk_scp_of_cluster *scp_cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct list_head *cluster = &scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list;
+	const struct mtk_scp_of_data **cluster_of_data;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
+	int core_id = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+		if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
+		if (!cpdev) {
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			dev_err(dev, "Not found platform device for core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		scp = scp_rproc_init(cpdev, scp_cluster, cluster_of_data[core_id]);
+		put_device(&cpdev->dev);
+		if (IS_ERR(scp)) {
+			ret = PTR_ERR(scp);
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize core %d rproc\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
+			of_node_put(child);
+			scp_free(scp);
+			goto init_fail;
+		}
+
+		list_add_tail(&scp->elem, cluster);
+		core_id++;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+init_fail:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+		scp_free(scp);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int scp_is_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+	struct device_node *child;
+
+	child = of_get_next_available_child(np, NULL);
+	if (!child)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No child node\n");
+
+	of_node_put(child);
+	return of_node_name_eq(child, "cros-ec-rpmsg");
+}
+
+static int scp_cluster_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = scp_is_single_core(pdev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ret)
+		ret = scp_add_single_core(pdev);
+	else
+		ret = scp_add_multi_core(pdev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1021,6 +1117,10 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scp_cluster->mtk_scp_list);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, scp_cluster);
 
+	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
+
 	ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -1114,12 +1214,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
+	&mt8195_of_data,
+	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
+	NULL
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
> the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
> driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
> to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.
> 
> Add the remoteproc instances of multi-core SCP to the SCP cluster list.
> When the SCP driver is removed, it cleanup resources by walking
> through the cluster list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 07/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers operations

[Tinghan Shen]

Due to that SCP core 0 controls the SCP clock and SRAM power, add two
new mtk_scp_of_data operations, scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers,
to manage the boot sequence and watchdog timeout handling of SCP core 1.
It ensures that core 1 boots after or shuts down before core 0 for
maintaining the proper control flow over SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 56395e8664cb..0bfd242c41cc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
 	void (*scp_reset_deassert)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
 	void (*scp_stop)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
 	void *(*scp_da_to_va)(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len);
+	void (*scp_boot_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
+	void (*scp_shutdown_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
 
 	u32 host_to_scp_reg;
 	u32 host_to_scp_int_bit;
@@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
 	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
 
 	struct list_head elem;
+	struct list_head *cluster;
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index d644e232dfec..edbf71f4c21e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -74,8 +74,21 @@ void scp_put(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_put);
 
+static void mt8195_scp_shutdown_peers(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp *next_scp;
+
+	next_scp = list_next_entry(scp, elem);
+	list_for_each_entry_from(next_scp, scp->cluster, elem) {
+		rproc_shutdown(next_scp->rproc);
+	}
+}
+
 static void scp_wdt_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 scp_to_host)
 {
+	if (scp->data->scp_shutdown_peers)
+		scp->data->scp_shutdown_peers(scp);
+
 	dev_err(scp->dev, "SCP watchdog timeout! 0x%x", scp_to_host);
 	rproc_report_crash(scp->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
 }
@@ -539,6 +552,18 @@ static int scp_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_boot_peers(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	struct mtk_scp *next_scp;
+
+	if (scp->cluster && !list_empty(scp->cluster)) {
+		next_scp = list_next_entry(scp, elem);
+		list_for_each_entry_from(next_scp, scp->cluster, elem) {
+			rproc_boot(next_scp->rproc);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static int scp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
@@ -574,6 +599,9 @@ static int scp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 	clk_disable_unprepare(scp->clk);
 	dev_info(dev, "SCP is ready. FW version %s\n", run->fw_ver);
 
+	if (scp->data->scp_boot_peers)
+		scp->data->scp_boot_peers(scp);
+
 	return 0;
 
 stop:
@@ -977,6 +1005,8 @@ static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(scp))
 		return PTR_ERR(scp);
 
+	scp->cluster = cluster;
+
 	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
@@ -989,6 +1019,15 @@ static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void scp_rproc_boot_core0(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
+{
+	struct rproc *rproc = context;
+
+	rproc_boot(rproc);
+
+	release_firmware(fw);
+}
+
 static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1029,6 +1068,10 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto init_fail;
 		}
 
+		/* boot after all cores are discovered */
+		scp->rproc->auto_boot = false;
+		scp->cluster = cluster;
+
 		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
@@ -1041,6 +1084,16 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		core_id++;
 	}
 
+	/* boot core 0, and other cores are booted following core 0 */
+	scp = list_first_entry(cluster, struct mtk_scp, elem);
+	ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, FW_ACTION_UEVENT,
+				      scp->rproc->firmware, &scp->rproc->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
+				      scp->rproc, scp_rproc_boot_core0);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware_nowait err: %d\n", ret);
+		goto init_fail;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 init_fail:
@@ -1198,6 +1251,8 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
 	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
 	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
+	.scp_boot_peers = mt8195_scp_boot_peers,
+	.scp_shutdown_peers = mt8195_scp_shutdown_peers,
 	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 07/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers operations

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> Due to that SCP core 0 controls the SCP clock and SRAM power, add two
> new mtk_scp_of_data operations, scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers,
> to manage the boot sequence and watchdog timeout handling of SCP core 1.
> It ensures that core 1 boots after or shuts down before core 0 for
> maintaining the proper control flow over SCP core 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 56395e8664cb..0bfd242c41cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
>   	void (*scp_reset_deassert)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
>   	void (*scp_stop)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
>   	void *(*scp_da_to_va)(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len);
> +	void (*scp_boot_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
> +	void (*scp_shutdown_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
>   
>   	u32 host_to_scp_reg;
>   	u32 host_to_scp_int_bit;
> @@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>   	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
>   
>   	struct list_head elem;
> +	struct list_head *cluster;
>   };
>   
>   /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d644e232dfec..edbf71f4c21e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,21 @@ void scp_put(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_put);
>   
> +static void mt8195_scp_shutdown_peers(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp *next_scp;
> +
> +	next_scp = list_next_entry(scp, elem);
> +	list_for_each_entry_from(next_scp, scp->cluster, elem) {
> +		rproc_shutdown(next_scp->rproc);
> +	}

braces are not needed here; after fixing that,

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 07/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers operations

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:22:18PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> Due to that SCP core 0 controls the SCP clock and SRAM power, add two
> new mtk_scp_of_data operations, scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers,
> to manage the boot sequence and watchdog timeout handling of SCP core 1.
> It ensures that core 1 boots after or shuts down before core 0 for
> maintaining the proper control flow over SCP core 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  3 ++
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 56395e8664cb..0bfd242c41cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct mtk_scp_of_data {
>  	void (*scp_reset_deassert)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
>  	void (*scp_stop)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
>  	void *(*scp_da_to_va)(struct mtk_scp *scp, u64 da, size_t len);
> +	void (*scp_boot_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);
> +	void (*scp_shutdown_peers)(struct mtk_scp *scp);

This isn't what I suggested in my previous email.  This solution will not work
if a user is looking to independently start/stop CPU1 from sysfs.

I will not go further with this revision.

Mathieu

>  
>  	u32 host_to_scp_reg;
>  	u32 host_to_scp_int_bit;
> @@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ struct mtk_scp {
>  	struct rproc_subdev *rpmsg_subdev;
>  
>  	struct list_head elem;
> +	struct list_head *cluster;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index d644e232dfec..edbf71f4c21e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,21 @@ void scp_put(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scp_put);
>  
> +static void mt8195_scp_shutdown_peers(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp *next_scp;
> +
> +	next_scp = list_next_entry(scp, elem);
> +	list_for_each_entry_from(next_scp, scp->cluster, elem) {
> +		rproc_shutdown(next_scp->rproc);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void scp_wdt_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp, u32 scp_to_host)
>  {
> +	if (scp->data->scp_shutdown_peers)
> +		scp->data->scp_shutdown_peers(scp);
> +
>  	dev_err(scp->dev, "SCP watchdog timeout! 0x%x", scp_to_host);
>  	rproc_report_crash(scp->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
>  }
> @@ -539,6 +552,18 @@ static int scp_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void mt8195_scp_boot_peers(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	struct mtk_scp *next_scp;
> +
> +	if (scp->cluster && !list_empty(scp->cluster)) {
> +		next_scp = list_next_entry(scp, elem);
> +		list_for_each_entry_from(next_scp, scp->cluster, elem) {
> +			rproc_boot(next_scp->rproc);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int scp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct mtk_scp *scp = rproc->priv;
> @@ -574,6 +599,9 @@ static int scp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(scp->clk);
>  	dev_info(dev, "SCP is ready. FW version %s\n", run->fw_ver);
>  
> +	if (scp->data->scp_boot_peers)
> +		scp->data->scp_boot_peers(scp);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  stop:
> @@ -977,6 +1005,8 @@ static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(scp))
>  		return PTR_ERR(scp);
>  
> +	scp->cluster = cluster;
> +
>  	ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc\n");
> @@ -989,6 +1019,15 @@ static int scp_add_single_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void scp_rproc_boot_core0(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> +{
> +	struct rproc *rproc = context;
> +
> +	rproc_boot(rproc);
> +
> +	release_firmware(fw);
> +}
> +
>  static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1029,6 +1068,10 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto init_fail;
>  		}
>  
> +		/* boot after all cores are discovered */
> +		scp->rproc->auto_boot = false;
> +		scp->cluster = cluster;
> +
>  		ret = rproc_add(scp->rproc);
>  		if (ret) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "Failed to add rproc of core %d\n", core_id);
> @@ -1041,6 +1084,16 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		core_id++;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* boot core 0, and other cores are booted following core 0 */
> +	scp = list_first_entry(cluster, struct mtk_scp, elem);
> +	ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, FW_ACTION_UEVENT,
> +				      scp->rproc->firmware, &scp->rproc->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> +				      scp->rproc, scp_rproc_boot_core0);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware_nowait err: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto init_fail;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  init_fail:
> @@ -1198,6 +1251,8 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
>  	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
>  	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
>  	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
> +	.scp_boot_peers = mt8195_scp_boot_peers,
> +	.scp_shutdown_peers = mt8195_scp_shutdown_peers,
>  	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
>  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
>  };
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 08/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset

[Tinghan Shen]

Because MT8195 SCP core 0 and core 1 both boot from head of SRAM and
have the same viewpoint of SRAM, SCP has a "core 1 SRAM offset"
configuration to control the access destination of SCP core 1 to boot
core 1 from different SRAM location.

The "core 1 SRAM offset" configuration is composed by a range
and an offset. It works like a simple memory mapped mechanism.
When SCP core 1 accesses a SRAM address located in the range,
the SCP bus adds the configured offset to the address to
shift the physical destination address on SCP SRAM. This shifting is
transparent to the software running on SCP core 1.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  7 +++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 0bfd242c41cc..2806bd71ef94 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -65,6 +65,13 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
+#define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D		BIT(13)
+#define MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I		BIT(12)
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW		0x850b0
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH	0x850b4
+#define MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET			0x850d0
+
 #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
 #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
 
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index edbf71f4c21e..82bba6146d23 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -498,6 +498,9 @@ static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 
 static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
+	u32 sec_ctrl;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp_c0;
+
 	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD, 0);
 
 	/* hold SCP in reset while loading FW. */
@@ -506,6 +509,30 @@ static int mt8195_scp_c1_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
 	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
 
+	/*
+	 * The L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE and L2TCM_OFFSET shift the destination address
+	 * on SRAM when SCP core 1 accesses SRAM.
+	 *
+	 * This configuration solves booting the SCP core 0 and core 1 from
+	 * different SRAM address because core 0 and core 1 both boot from
+	 * the head of SRAM by default. this must be configured before boot SCP core 1.
+	 *
+	 * The value of L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE is from the viewpoint of SCP core 1.
+	 * When SCP core 1 issues address within the range (L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE),
+	 * the address will be added with a fixed offset (L2TCM_OFFSET) on the bus.
+	 * The shift action is tranparent to software.
+	 */
+	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_LOW);
+	writel(scp->sram_size, scp->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET_RANGE_0_HIGH);
+
+	scp_c0 = list_first_entry(scp->cluster, struct mtk_scp, elem);
+	writel(scp->sram_phys - scp_c0->sram_phys, scp->reg_base + MT8195_L2TCM_OFFSET);
+
+	/* enable SRAM offset when fetching instruction and data */
+	sec_ctrl = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+	sec_ctrl |= MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_I | MT8195_CORE_OFFSET_ENABLE_D;
+	writel(sec_ctrl, scp->reg_base + MT8195_SEC_CTRL);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 09/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout

[Tinghan Shen]

The MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout needs to be handled in the
SCP core 0 IRQ handler because the MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
IRQ is wired on the same IRQ entry for core 0 watchdog timeout.
MT8195 SCP has a watchdog status register to identify the watchdog
timeout source when IRQ triggered.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  5 +++++
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
index 2806bd71ef94..1590175ea688 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ		0x10030
 #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG		0x10034
 
+#define MT8195_SYS_STATUS		0x4004
+#define MT8195_CORE0_WDT		BIT(16)
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT		BIT(17)
+
 #define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
 
 #define MT8195_CPU1_SRAM_PD			0x1084
@@ -63,6 +67,7 @@
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_CLR		0x20000
 #define MT8195_CORE1_SW_RSTN_SET		0x20004
 #define MT8195_CORE1_MEM_ATT_PREDEF		0x20008
+#define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ			0x20030
 #define MT8195_CORE1_WDT_CFG			0x20034
 
 #define MT8195_SEC_CTRL				0x85000
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 82bba6146d23..66105ed2f3db 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -243,6 +243,29 @@ static void mt8192_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	}
 }
 
+static void mt8195_scp_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
+{
+	u32 scp_to_host;
+
+	scp_to_host = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_SET);
+
+	if (scp_to_host & MT8192_SCP_IPC_INT_BIT) {
+		scp_ipi_handler(scp);
+	} else {
+		u32 reason = readl(scp->reg_base + MT8195_SYS_STATUS);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE0_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		if (reason & MT8195_CORE1_WDT)
+			writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8195_CORE1_WDT_IRQ);
+
+		scp_wdt_handler(scp, reason);
+	}
+
+	writel(scp_to_host, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2APMCU_IPC_CLR);
+}
+
 static void mt8195_scp_c1_irq_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 {
 	u32 scp_to_host;
@@ -1273,7 +1296,7 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
 static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
 	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
 	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_before_load,
-	.scp_irq_handler = mt8192_scp_irq_handler,
+	.scp_irq_handler = mt8195_scp_irq_handler,
 	.scp_reset_assert = mt8192_scp_reset_assert,
 	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
 	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 10/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message

[Tinghan Shen]

The error message doesn't accurately reflect the cause of the error.
The error is due to a handler not being found, not an invalid IPI ID.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
index 66105ed2f3db..bf859df74005 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void scp_ipi_handler(struct mtk_scp *scp)
 	scp_ipi_lock(scp, id);
 	handler = ipi_desc[id].handler;
 	if (!handler) {
-		dev_err(scp->dev, "No such ipi id = %d\n", id);
+		dev_err(scp->dev, "No handler for ipi id = %d\n", id);
 		scp_ipi_unlock(scp, id);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core

[Tinghan Shen]

Rewrite the MT8195 SCP device node as a cluster and
add the SCP 2nd core in it.

Since the SCP device node is changed to multi-core structure,
enable SCP cluster to enable probing SCP core 0.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |  6 +++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      | 34 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
index 37a3e9de90ff..4584077d3a4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi
@@ -991,7 +991,11 @@
 	interrupts-extended = <&pio 222 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 };
 
-&scp {
+&scp_cluster {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&scp_c0 {
 	status = "okay";
 
 	firmware-name = "mediatek/mt8195/scp.img";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index 48b72b3645e1..7809118f74fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -922,14 +922,30 @@
 			clocks = <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_GCE2>;
 		};
 
-		scp: scp@10500000 {
-			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp";
-			reg = <0 0x10500000 0 0x100000>,
-			      <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>,
-			      <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
-			reg-names = "sram", "cfg", "l1tcm";
-			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+		scp_cluster: scp@10500000 {
+			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual";
+			reg = <0 0x10720000 0 0xe0000>, <0 0x10700000 0 0x8000>;
+			reg-names = "cfg", "l1tcm";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges = <0 0 0x10500000 0x100000>;
 			status = "disabled";
+
+			scp_c0: scp@0 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0x0 0xa0000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 462 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
+
+			scp_c1: scp@a0000 {
+				compatible = "mediatek,scp-core";
+				reg = <0xa0000 0x20000>;
+				reg-names = "sram";
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 463 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
 		};
 
 		scp_adsp: clock-controller@10720000 {
@@ -2374,7 +2390,7 @@
 
 		video-codec@18000000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-dec";
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			iommus = <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L21_VDEC_MC_EXT>;
 			#address-cells = <2>;
 			#size-cells = <2>;
@@ -2540,7 +2556,7 @@
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_LUMA>,
 				 <&iommu_vdo M4U_PORT_L19_VENC_REF_CHROMA>;
 			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 341 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
-			mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
+			mediatek,scp = <&scp_c0>;
 			clocks = <&vencsys CLK_VENC_VENC>;
 			clock-names = "venc_sel";
 			assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VENC>;
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a
> single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st
> core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support
> to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.
> 

Hello TingHan,

Can you please address the comments on patch [05/11] and send a new version ASAP?
That's the only remaining issue, so after that the series should be ready.

Thanks,
Angelo

> v12 -> v13:
> 1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7
> 2. add review tag to patchset 3
> 3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11
> 
> v11 -> v12:
> 1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
> 2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
> 3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
> 4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow
> 5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7
> 6. remove patchset 7 review tag
> 
> v10 -> v11:
> 1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
> 2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
>     platform data property to the driver data property
> 3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7
> 
> v9 -> v10:
> 1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
> 2. remove an unnecessary if() condition
> 
> v8 -> v9:
> 1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11
> 2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks
> 
> v7 -> v8:
> 1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
> 2. squash register definitions into driver patches
> 3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11
> 
> v6 -> v7:
> 1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
>     at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch
> 
> v5 -> v6:
> 1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
> 2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> 1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation
> 2. fix dual-core watchdog handling
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> 3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> 3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
> 4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
> 5. refine IPI error message
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. update dt-binding property description
> 2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
> 3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c
> 
> 
> Tinghan Shen (11):
>    dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
>      definition
>    arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
>    dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers
>      operations
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
>    remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
>    arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
> 
>   .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++++-
>   .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
>   .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
>   .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  32 +-
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  26 ++
>   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 425 ++++++++++++++++--
>   7 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
> > The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a
> > single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st
> > core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support
> > to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.
> > 
> 
> Hello TingHan,
> 
> Can you please address the comments on patch [05/11] and send a new version ASAP?
> That's the only remaining issue, so after that the series should be ready.
> 

There is also the refactoring work in patch 07, and I expect that to take a
while.

> Thanks,
> Angelo
> 
> > v12 -> v13:
> > 1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7
> > 2. add review tag to patchset 3
> > 3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11
> > 
> > v11 -> v12:
> > 1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
> > 2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
> > 3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
> > 4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow
> > 5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7
> > 6. remove patchset 7 review tag
> > 
> > v10 -> v11:
> > 1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
> > 2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
> >     platform data property to the driver data property
> > 3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7
> > 
> > v9 -> v10:
> > 1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
> > 2. remove an unnecessary if() condition
> > 
> > v8 -> v9:
> > 1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11
> > 2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks
> > 
> > v7 -> v8:
> > 1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
> > 2. squash register definitions into driver patches
> > 3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11
> > 
> > v6 -> v7:
> > 1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
> >     at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch
> > 
> > v5 -> v6:
> > 1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
> > 2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'
> > 
> > v4 -> v5:
> > 1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation
> > 2. fix dual-core watchdog handling
> > 
> > v3 -> v4:
> > 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> > 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> > 3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation
> > 
> > v2 -> v3:
> > 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
> > 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
> > 3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
> > 4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
> > 5. refine IPI error message
> > 
> > v1 -> v2:
> > 1. update dt-binding property description
> > 2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
> > 3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c
> > 
> > 
> > Tinghan Shen (11):
> >    dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
> >      definition
> >    arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
> >    dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers
> >      operations
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
> >    remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
> >    arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
> > 
> >   .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++++-
> >   .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
> >   .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
> >   .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  32 +-
> >   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  26 ++
> >   drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 425 ++++++++++++++++--
> >   7 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Add support for MT8195 SCP 2nd core

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 22/06/23 19:17, Mathieu Poirier ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:00:08PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 07/06/23 09:22, Tinghan Shen ha scritto:
>>> The mediatek remoteproc driver currently only allows bringing up a
>>> single core SCP, e.g. MT8183. It also only bringing up the 1st
>>> core in SoCs with a dual-core SCP, e.g. MT8195. This series support
>>> to bring-up the 2nd core of the dual-core SCP.
>>>
>>
>> Hello TingHan,
>>
>> Can you please address the comments on patch [05/11] and send a new version ASAP?
>> That's the only remaining issue, so after that the series should be ready.
>>
> 
> There is also the refactoring work in patch 07, and I expect that to take a
> while.
> 

That's right, I forgot about that one. Thanks for that.

Cheers

>> Thanks,
>> Angelo
>>
>>> v12 -> v13:
>>> 1. replace subdevice with new mediatek scp operations in patchset 7
>>> 2. add review tag to patchset 3
>>> 3. modify mediatek,scp phandle name of video-codec@18000000 at patchset 11
>>>
>>> v11 -> v12:
>>> 1. add scp_add_single/multi_core() to patchset 6
>>> 2. remove unused comment in patchset 6
>>> 3. rename list name from mtk_scp_cluster to mtk_scp_list
>>> 4. rewrite the multi-core probe flow
>>> 5. disable rproc->autoboot and boot rproc by request_firmware_nowait at patchset 7
>>> 6. remove patchset 7 review tag
>>>
>>> v10 -> v11:
>>> 1. rewrite patchset 5 to probe single-core SCP with the cluster list
>>> 2. Also in patchset 5, move the pointer of mtk_scp object from the
>>>      platform data property to the driver data property
>>> 3. move the appearance of mtk_scp cluster property to patcheset 7
>>>
>>> v9 -> v10:
>>> 1. move the global mtk_scp list into the platform device driver data structure
>>> 2. remove an unnecessary if() condition
>>>
>>> v8 -> v9:
>>> 1. initialize l1tcm_size/l1tcm_phys at patchset 05/11
>>> 2. rewrite patchset 06/11 to unify the flow and remove hacks
>>>
>>> v7 -> v8:
>>> 1. update the node name of mt8192 asurada SCP rpmsg subnode
>>> 2. squash register definitions into driver patches
>>> 3. initialize local variables on the declaration at patch v8 06/11
>>>
>>> v6 -> v7:
>>> 1. merge the mtk_scp_cluster struct into the mtk_scp structure
>>>      at the "Probe multi-core SCP" patch
>>>
>>> v5 -> v6:
>>> 1. move the mtk_scp_of_regs structure from mtk_common.h to mtk_scp.c
>>> 2. rename the SCP core 0 label from 'scp' to 'scp_c0'
>>>
>>> v4 -> v5:
>>> 1. move resource release actions to the platform driver remove operation
>>> 2. fix dual-core watchdog handling
>>>
>>> v3 -> v4:
>>> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
>>> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
>>> 3. drop 'remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP' in v3 for further investigation
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> 1. change the representation of dual-core SCP in dts file and update SCP yaml
>>> 2. rewrite SCP driver to reflect the change of dts node
>>> 3. add SCP core 1 node to mt8195.dtsi
>>> 4. remove redundant call of rproc_boot for SCP
>>> 5. refine IPI error message
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> 1. update dt-binding property description
>>> 2. remove kconfig for scp dual driver
>>> 3. merge mtk_scp_dual.c and mtk_scp_subdev.c to mtk_scp.c
>>>
>>>
>>> Tinghan Shen (11):
>>>     dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Improve the rpmsg subnode
>>>       definition
>>>     arm64: dts: mediatek: Update the node name of SCP rpmsg subnode
>>>     dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Support MT8195 dual-core SCP
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Add MT8195 SCP core 1 operations
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Introduce cluster on single-core SCP
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Add scp_boot_peers and scp_shutdown_peers
>>>       operations
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Setup MT8195 SCP core 1 SRAM offset
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Handle MT8195 SCP core 1 watchdog timeout
>>>     remoteproc: mediatek: Refine ipi handler error message
>>>     arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8195: Add SCP 2nd core
>>>
>>>    .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml          | 176 +++++++-
>>>    .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi |   2 +-
>>>    .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi     |   2 +-
>>>    .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-cherry.dtsi      |   6 +-
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi      |  32 +-
>>>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h               |  26 ++
>>>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c                  | 425 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>    7 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
>>>
>>


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel