From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05558C0015E for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 05:25:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=VxsoSEnhbv7laWL/1LVhqVAdjltnF7yLSCtFj55H0sQ=; b=gEYCO7mkBwP2SG T0wfVQ3g0cpHNoSsyEeR9hxvAqd1Y7j4fKeTN31dOoh3Q+TJRk6hmF7lkW+64AyRfz1kLfGM9nRH3 GPphgzzekxVGexVDhyXhn3zBaaVlI9/Fer1I+qNEiox/yoV+2ZK1Lg7bS5cnzy0DSDrEajVbPejF6 vwPRNaknl9EWVA88cPKK5VIDbn06vRL4YAel/6sqNkDEk05eiIRCTkdpIukbLHO0K0FiiazBw/DVh QVOImJc1mvEpag2g5fl+9k+ybYEBrVyH5nO6cwe/s34CkYMcWytMrWpHTuvhIvz9LLEn2MAFG4Ncv QYhwuv6R3wxUh8QetdWQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qLzgx-005I4o-30; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 05:25:40 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qLzgq-005Hzb-05 for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 05:25:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=nMaNKzW364IzXp39gEH13PO0+N2Kob1GSxyJEEV3FuQ=; b=R3qMoaBrFvrvJnYBh4wiqP7xBA Qu7Idb7oG2QgmPZB1Y7a+7UdQOHDPKgjCMcq1vnSCqnsp9lwFK7B6+sH5IqkQ2dSi1k+WWrVknGD5 gXFYNAtLs6r8ACSrHMsTRon7VUynMz1dk8R/N6jmyavGJjuvRFkQFgyuqGGaKkbIDxfwMLmlJ48Fw yXklW62FCc5PcxLPRvrOpKLe+wmYZz2SIalGBTqrUajq8pahsV4MgOHUsRijIWcYI2W35lUKbOmuo RhCF56x7OUP7wzt3n5DWAXCdBwQp3qxwnxAf5m0cfuBWxTu4NEqj7xe0gC5M0zdkQJre07RRImUv9 f/M1GgeA==; Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qLmxk-00BhvJ-2u for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:50:11 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6689430d803so3926642b3a.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:50:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1689695286; x=1692287286; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nMaNKzW364IzXp39gEH13PO0+N2Kob1GSxyJEEV3FuQ=; b=yUvq8kPvagHqLvP5wLP/JLTNJ4EPEruA/erv9/PV5l+FI3k3ExL84pPm2i91UaZ5wu mpQ7B3tyeWX2NkIEDXbqxeohUly2cQpmCFIhXzTjtxRGRKwznKGaCqmZg6MWO9Y+ByrE BPfXr/ZxMxmnU2ofcxtI0hJfdhLb9vamRo0kaA839lyHXGcmJbQTX6eZtTndjCXie0M0 m/2DqZjQ+rbXo7OqVoDhCuQ/Rp60Y1RTf7G4SyNYGp2LiW5IW7ivch+iICV12IW4N/pt da4AAeHJxMnWQJXpaP1f3YSM1sfFzpOTmU3UvM48ynDCK5tkKCSZF7H6iHSvFapeI3xe P5Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689695286; x=1692287286; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nMaNKzW364IzXp39gEH13PO0+N2Kob1GSxyJEEV3FuQ=; b=G+zaThQ8LUIpvLr41/N5/qgM+B8zI9bnMDnUUKhyaRNo7YDWr2eAUBYeLAJB8VqEV0 0tUV8KK1hgXEyICsRlfffmYwan02j8Saf0sNGEEo7Rp5snsqoNLZGQ8TaDNFQMTN4WhB 9ef/jutqsInk6IjcsTeyAkliLJgYhDtMz8VhNbGrChMVEAnj2JG6FMwjxAixYZwuCnn6 FYmQYy9fEodsBqm9tqbj/aADchBNszDUV2ATIv02zCraNf54IO1M8rRdaNgx4fv5rs3g 2UVPitxtQPavViW9PP2+xskCDaruee/eAnxcodcCv9I7M+dUbYQFFg4cfWq8u2BTOTVw V3zg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYrOvipkofRujdxfhw+3umiqQUnsBhWJ62kRO3wNl59UgwxeXJl ckD2XG9dfnLnERBEEB4Ml/cI6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlH9RnLLkdWYjAyRtMI2gK97UOiaQOggN18fZu9Dxpw3LMeoROZuCKARy5NAcvxTDRqufFLgiA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:a122:b0:132:86ea:4725 with SMTP id q34-20020a056a20a12200b0013286ea4725mr17258077pzk.45.1689695285867; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:181:e3fe:53e1:920]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x53-20020a056a000bf500b00684ca1b45b9sm1748933pfu.149.2023.07.18.08.48.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 09:48:02 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Iuliana Prodan Cc: "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" , Bjorn Andersson , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , "S.J. Wang" , Fabio Estevam , Daniel Baluta , Mpuaudiosw , linux-imx , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team , LnxRevLi Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor Message-ID: References: <20230712224251.26482-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com> <6fe5691f-67f4-ff70-8350-b4b6c08097b0@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6fe5691f-67f4-ff70-8350-b4b6c08097b0@nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230718_165009_278066_DF3CBF11 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 37.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 11:30:43AM +0300, Iuliana Prodan wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On 7/17/2023 8:34 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Hi Iuliana, > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 01:42:51AM +0300, Iuliana Prodan (OSS) wrote: > > > From: Iuliana Prodan > > > > > > There are cases when we want to test samples that do not > > > reply with FW READY message, after fw is loaded and the > > > remote processor started. > > This seems like a bug to me - where is this FW comes from? > The firmware is a generic sample from Zephyr repo: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/main/samples/subsys/ipc/openamp_rsc_table > > There is no bug, this is how the application was written. But how did it ever worked before? And how does having a module flag to characterize each FW implementation that springs up in the field can scale (and be maintainable)? > > Rather than modifying a generic sample for i.MX usecase, I prefer doing an > "insmod imx_dsp_rproc.ko ignore_dsp_ready=1" just for this sample. We already have a "no_mailbox" flag for cases where the FW doesn't need to communicate with the main processor. What happens when some FW implementation requires a three-way handshake? How many flags do we spin off? As I said above this approach is not sustainable. I suggest to either fix the FW (it doesn't work with upstream in its present form anyway) or start using the config space as described here [1] to dynamically probe the characteristics of the FW being loaded. Whichever option you chose, the FW needs to be updated and the former is a lot more simple. Thanks, Mathieu [1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/remoteproc.h#L298 > > Thanks, > Iulia > > > > In these cases, do not wait for a confirmation from the remote processor > > > at start. > > > > > > Added "ignore_dsp_ready" flag while inserting the module to ignore > > > remote processor reply after start. > > > By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan > > > > > > --- > > > This was discovered while testing openamp_rsc_table sample from Zephyr > > > repo (https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fzephyrproject-rtos%2Fzephyr%2Ftree%2Fmain%2Fsamples%2Fsubsys%2Fipc%2Fopenamp_rsc_table&data=05%7C01%7Ciuliana.prodan%40nxp.com%7C4779cb20393e4af08a9408db86ec191e%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638252120814415013%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iCjvv8wr3sQ4CEXFcXDsW0VSw5RXr1ASw7LN2J08SXE%3D&reserved=0). > > > > > > We have IPC, but the remote proc doesn't send a FW_READY reply. > > > --- > > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > index b5634507d953..ed89de2f3b98 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c > > > @@ -36,7 +36,13 @@ module_param_named(no_mailboxes, no_mailboxes, int, 0644); > > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_mailboxes, > > > "There is no mailbox between cores, so ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off)."); > > > +static unsigned int imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready; > > > +module_param_named(ignore_dsp_ready, imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready, int, 0644); > > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_dsp_ready, > > > + "Ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off)."); > > > + > > > #define REMOTE_IS_READY BIT(0) > > > +#define REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY BIT(1) > > > #define REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES 500 > > > /* att flags */ > > > @@ -296,6 +302,12 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_ready(struct rproc *rproc) > > > if (!priv->rxdb_ch) > > > return 0; > > > + /* > > > + * FW_READY reply is optional/ignored, so don't wait for it. > > > + */ > > > + if (priv->flags & REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > for (i = 0; i < REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES; i++) { > > > if (priv->flags & REMOTE_IS_READY) > > > return 0; > > > @@ -1119,6 +1131,9 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > else > > > imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init = imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc; > > > + if (imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready) > > > + priv->flags |= REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY; > > > + > > > dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc); > > > INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_dsp_rproc_vq_work); > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel