From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0997AC001DE for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2023 16:56:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/B9NejluR4+WnhrFnVd5iKoPJcLp0HrnHKgBa3M/2j8=; b=gAuCGyipcuXKw8 6+GeaSBLMJriiMneF45d2SLdptDIEHlB28dY1mU5KefAp83Xy8Ot93TT88Db/YlsFsh4CZCBMrR0A vPD/GRW6IgAcMQk1padAefy4qf2SvRRYZQvDf2LSkBmhC1OrvCKN2IjEwiOM/GZQ7O0ckDmWTE5L2 1THF+D4rPafvN9UeYXgnPQ76KpcOWx60gywQrUNE5LO3JO3Ocot00uzUInUtL9mgSn6KTRY13FgQg R3i7FQOdBF9gRgSv39giIpMiHgkbCbNyj1cI43Kcdc/erZmJSMLq9PisH1bgvJmXwSsVjE7PVIxls IjE2QEyXZeQZjxtfjtRw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qSKZ3-00EMea-39; Sat, 05 Aug 2023 16:55:41 +0000 Received: from out-64.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.64]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qSKZ0-00EMdQ-1b for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2023 16:55:40 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 02:51:53 +1000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jookia.org; s=key1; t=1691254534; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vYiFCAoB7u7dk9JF+5uYfQo9xx6aksS21sN43dAesb0=; b=JrgfMyBOF+ZiXCAmC60LBYPR24oFRCx33u0KZKY303F1zTsxaeJJ7iEE6sA7OWwJCUtxVw A4UvLxWn95TKqI4CkmGVAhWOqcAk4CvjbA6aGNLXTBYeY5prTGoIAKBqUNZfh8PsTWAhSx mkMIlM80OTxepI54dfk4DvO/fhfio2g2w6Zzi5o65Zgb64BkrnRxk/0vcwiQ5WIdKQu7ws UkUlMgbKObQ9hReGcP3QkIQBOowRV6faBzQyCP3EDy5F73PN6SkeTDX0F52E6eStUZpU+6 lQWwk6FI39d1N9Wuz7kOXLbqbOsByN6rNvid4pDiwRHmDYcOJf+RggI/enu0Ew== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: John Watts To: Maksim Kiselev Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, conor+dt@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, kuba@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, mkl@pengutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, samuel@sholland.org, wens@csie.org, wg@grandegger.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] riscv: dts: allwinner: d1: Add CAN controller nodes Message-ID: References: <20230721221552.1973203-4-contact@jookia.org> <20230805164052.669184-1-bigunclemax@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230805164052.669184-1-bigunclemax@gmail.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230805_095539_239460_CD5E6DD9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.98 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 07:40:52PM +0300, Maksim Kiselev wrote: > Hi John, Jernej > Should we also keep a pinctrl nodes itself in alphabetical order? > I mean placing a CAN nodes before `clk_pg11_pin` node? > Looks like the other nodes sorted in this way... Good catch. Now that you mention it, the device tree nodes are sorted by memory order too! These should be after i2c3. It looks like I might need to do a patch to re-order those too. > Cheers, > Maksim John. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel