* Re: [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT [not found] <20230725202404.3470111-1-chris.zjh@huawei.com> @ 2023-08-03 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas 2023-08-04 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2023-08-03 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhang Jianhua Cc: will, mark.rutland, ryan.roberts, joey.gouly, ardb, anshuman.khandual, bhe, thunder.leizhen, broonie, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:24:04PM +0000, Zhang Jianhua wrote: > When building with W=1, the following warning occurs. > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:129:41: error: "PUD_SHIFT" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror=undef] > 129 | #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT PUD_SHIFT > | ^~~~~~~~~ > arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:142:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT’ > 142 | #if ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT < SECTION_SIZE_BITS > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > The reason is that PUD_SHIFT isn't defined if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 > and CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39. The correct description is that the generic PUD_SHIFT isn't defined for asm files, we still have it defined for C files (there's an #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ guard). > Now move the macro ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT and > ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN to arch/arm64/mm/init.c where it is used to avoid > this issue, and also there is no other place to call these two macro. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> This fix works for me. I'll leave it to Will for 6.6 as apart from the warning with W=1, there's no other issue (ARM64_MEMSTART_* are not used in any asm files). Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT 2023-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT Catalin Marinas @ 2023-08-04 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual 2023-08-04 6:39 ` zhangjianhua (E) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2023-08-04 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Catalin Marinas, Zhang Jianhua Cc: will, mark.rutland, ryan.roberts, joey.gouly, ardb, bhe, thunder.leizhen, broonie, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel On 8/3/23 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:24:04PM +0000, Zhang Jianhua wrote: >> When building with W=1, the following warning occurs. >> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:129:41: error: "PUD_SHIFT" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror=undef] >> 129 | #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT PUD_SHIFT >> | ^~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:142:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT’ >> 142 | #if ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT < SECTION_SIZE_BITS >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> The reason is that PUD_SHIFT isn't defined if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 >> and CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39. > > The correct description is that the generic PUD_SHIFT isn't defined for > asm files, we still have it defined for C files (there's an #ifndef > __ASSEMBLY__ guard). Agreed, please rework the commit message explaining how generic PUD_SHIFT definition is not available for assembly files, prompting this code block movement. CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 with CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39 just help in exposing this problem. > >> Now move the macro ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT and >> ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN to arch/arm64/mm/init.c where it is used to avoid >> this issue, and also there is no other place to call these two macro. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> > > This fix works for me. I'll leave it to Will for 6.6 as apart from the > warning with W=1, there's no other issue (ARM64_MEMSTART_* are not used > in any asm files). Right, not real a problem to be fixed, this can wait till 6.6 > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT 2023-08-04 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual @ 2023-08-04 6:39 ` zhangjianhua (E) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: zhangjianhua (E) @ 2023-08-04 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anshuman Khandual, Catalin Marinas Cc: will, mark.rutland, ryan.roberts, joey.gouly, ardb, bhe, thunder.leizhen, broonie, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel 在 2023/8/4 14:24, Anshuman Khandual 写道: > > On 8/3/23 22:36, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:24:04PM +0000, Zhang Jianhua wrote: >>> When building with W=1, the following warning occurs. >>> >>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:129:41: error: "PUD_SHIFT" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror=undef] >>> 129 | #define ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT PUD_SHIFT >>> | ^~~~~~~~~ >>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kernel-pgtable.h:142:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT’ >>> 142 | #if ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT < SECTION_SIZE_BITS >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> The reason is that PUD_SHIFT isn't defined if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 >>> and CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39. >> The correct description is that the generic PUD_SHIFT isn't defined for >> asm files, we still have it defined for C files (there's an #ifndef >> __ASSEMBLY__ guard). > Agreed, please rework the commit message explaining how generic PUD_SHIFT > definition is not available for assembly files, prompting this code block > movement. CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3 with CONFIG_VA_BITS == 39 just help > in exposing this problem. No problem, I will send a new patch soon. >>> Now move the macro ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT and >>> ARM64_MEMSTART_ALIGN to arch/arm64/mm/init.c where it is used to avoid >>> this issue, and also there is no other place to call these two macro. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@huawei.com> >> This fix works for me. I'll leave it to Will for 6.6 as apart from the >> warning with W=1, there's no other issue (ARM64_MEMSTART_* are not used >> in any asm files). > Right, not real a problem to be fixed, this can wait till 6.6 > >> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-04 6:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230725202404.3470111-1-chris.zjh@huawei.com>
2023-08-03 17:06 ` [PATCH -next v3] arm64: fix build warning for ARM64_MEMSTART_SHIFT Catalin Marinas
2023-08-04 6:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-04 6:39 ` zhangjianhua (E)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).