From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Haixin Yu <yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@arm.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Sohom Datta <sohomdatta1@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update scale units and descriptions of common topdown metrics
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:15:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNz2HO/NGsz+2Qaa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816114841.1679234-4-james.clark@arm.com>
Em Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:47:45PM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> Metrics will be published here [1] going forwards, but they have
> slightly different scale units. To allow autogenerated metrics to be
> added more easily, update the scale units to match.
>
> The more detailed descriptions have also been taken and added to the
> common file.
>
> [1]: https://gitlab.arm.com/telemetry-solution/telemetry-solution/-/tree/main/data/pmu/cpu/
This one I had cherry-picked and is already in perf-tools-next, I
applied the others locally, will wait till later to see if people
ack/object.
- Arnaldo
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json | 24 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json
> index f90b338261ac..4eed79a28f6e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/sbsa.json
> @@ -1,34 +1,34 @@
> [
> {
> - "MetricExpr": "stall_slot_frontend / (#slots * cpu_cycles)",
> - "BriefDescription": "Frontend bound L1 topdown metric",
> + "MetricExpr": "100 * (stall_slot_frontend / (#slots * cpu_cycles))",
> + "BriefDescription": "This metric is the percentage of total slots that were stalled due to resource constraints in the frontend of the processor.",
> "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1",
> "MetricGroup": "Default;TopdownL1",
> "MetricName": "frontend_bound",
> - "ScaleUnit": "100%"
> + "ScaleUnit": "1percent of slots"
> },
> {
> - "MetricExpr": "(1 - op_retired / op_spec) * (1 - stall_slot / (#slots * cpu_cycles))",
> - "BriefDescription": "Bad speculation L1 topdown metric",
> + "MetricExpr": "100 * ((1 - op_retired / op_spec) * (1 - stall_slot / (#slots * cpu_cycles)))",
> + "BriefDescription": "This metric is the percentage of total slots that executed operations and didn't retire due to a pipeline flush.\nThis indicates cycles that were utilized but inefficiently.",
> "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1",
> "MetricGroup": "Default;TopdownL1",
> "MetricName": "bad_speculation",
> - "ScaleUnit": "100%"
> + "ScaleUnit": "1percent of slots"
> },
> {
> - "MetricExpr": "(op_retired / op_spec) * (1 - stall_slot / (#slots * cpu_cycles))",
> - "BriefDescription": "Retiring L1 topdown metric",
> + "MetricExpr": "100 * ((op_retired / op_spec) * (1 - stall_slot / (#slots * cpu_cycles)))",
> + "BriefDescription": "This metric is the percentage of total slots that retired operations, which indicates cycles that were utilized efficiently.",
> "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1",
> "MetricGroup": "Default;TopdownL1",
> "MetricName": "retiring",
> - "ScaleUnit": "100%"
> + "ScaleUnit": "1percent of slots"
> },
> {
> - "MetricExpr": "stall_slot_backend / (#slots * cpu_cycles)",
> - "BriefDescription": "Backend Bound L1 topdown metric",
> + "MetricExpr": "100 * (stall_slot_backend / (#slots * cpu_cycles))",
> + "BriefDescription": "This metric is the percentage of total slots that were stalled due to resource constraints in the backend of the processor.",
> "DefaultMetricgroupName": "TopdownL1",
> "MetricGroup": "Default;TopdownL1",
> "MetricName": "backend_bound",
> - "ScaleUnit": "100%"
> + "ScaleUnit": "1percent of slots"
> }
> ]
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 11:47 [PATCH v6 0/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update N2 and V2 metrics and events using Arm telemetry repo James Clark
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] perf arm64: Allow version comparisons of CPU IDs James Clark
2023-08-17 9:51 ` John Garry
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior James Clark
2023-08-16 16:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-08-17 9:02 ` James Clark
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update scale units and descriptions of common topdown metrics James Clark
2023-08-16 16:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] perf jevents: Add a new expression builtin strcmp_cpuid_str() James Clark
2023-08-17 9:53 ` John Garry
2023-08-29 23:46 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-30 17:14 ` James Clark
2023-08-30 17:59 ` Ian Rogers
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update stall_slot workaround for N2 r0p3 James Clark
2023-08-17 11:08 ` John Garry
2023-08-16 11:47 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] perf vendor events arm64: Update N2 and V2 metrics and events using Arm telemetry repo James Clark
2023-08-17 11:09 ` John Garry
2023-08-17 14:41 ` James Clark
2023-08-17 17:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNz2HO/NGsz+2Qaa@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.forrington@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sohomdatta1@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).