Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: stm32: fix incorrect optional pointers

From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>,
	"Arnaud Pouliquen" <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Fabien Dessenne" <fabien.dessenne@st.com>,
	"Ludovic Barre" <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
	"Loic Pallardy" <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: stm32: fix incorrect optional pointers
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:20:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOPHEUQYzbYsFS7Y@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230724195704.2432382-1-arnd@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 09:56:49PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Compile-testing without CONFIG_OF shows that the of_match_ptr() macro
> was used incorrectly here:
> 
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:662:34: warning: unused variable 'stm32_rproc_match' [-Wunused-const-variable]
> 
> As in almost every driver, the solution is simply to remove the
> use of this macro. The same thing happened with the deprecated
> SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(), but the corresponding warning was already shut
> up with __maybe_unused annotations, so fix those as well by using the
> correct DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() macros and removing the extraneous
> __maybe_unused modifiers. For completeness, also add a pm_ptr() to let
> the PM ops be eliminated completely when CONFIG_PM is turned off.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307242300.ia82qBTp-lkp@intel.com
> Fixes: 03bd158e1535e ("remoteproc: stm32: use correct format strings on 64-bit")
> Fixes: 410119ee29b6c ("remoteproc: stm32: wakeup the system by wdg irq")
> Fixes: 13140de09cc2d ("remoteproc: stm32: add an ST stm32_rproc driver")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Fixed 13-character SHAs and applied.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 98234b44f0389..9d9b13530f78a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ static void stm32_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	rproc_free(rproc);
>  }
>  
> -static int __maybe_unused stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int __maybe_unused stm32_rproc_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int stm32_rproc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> @@ -943,16 +943,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused stm32_rproc_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm32_rproc_pm_ops,
> -			 stm32_rproc_suspend, stm32_rproc_resume);
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm32_rproc_pm_ops,
> +				stm32_rproc_suspend, stm32_rproc_resume);
>  
>  static struct platform_driver stm32_rproc_driver = {
>  	.probe = stm32_rproc_probe,
>  	.remove_new = stm32_rproc_remove,
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "stm32-rproc",
> -		.pm = &stm32_rproc_pm_ops,
> -		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stm32_rproc_match),
> +		.pm = pm_ptr(&stm32_rproc_pm_ops),
> +		.of_match_table = stm32_rproc_match,
>  	},
>  };
>  module_platform_driver(stm32_rproc_driver);
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel