Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm64: determine memory type from VMA

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:14:58AM -0700, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
> 
> Currently KVM determines if a VMA is pointing at IO memory by checking
> pfn_is_map_memory(). However, the MM already gives us a way to tell what
> kind of memory it is by inspecting the VMA.
> 
> Replace pfn_is_map_memory() with a check on the VMA pgprot to determine if
> the memory is IO and thus needs stage-2 device mapping.
> 
> The VMA's pgprot is tested to determine the memory type with the
> following mapping:
> 
>  pgprot_noncached    MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE   device
>  pgprot_writecombine MT_NORMAL_NC       device
>  pgprot_device       MT_DEVICE_nGnRE    device
>  pgprot_tagged       MT_NORMAL_TAGGED   RAM
> 
> This patch solves a problems where it is possible for the kernel to
> have VMAs pointing at cachable memory without causing
> pfn_is_map_memory() to be true, eg DAX memremap cases and CXL/pre-CXL
> devices. This memory is now properly marked as cachable in KVM.
> 
> Unfortunately when FWB is not enabled, the kernel expects to naively do
> cache management by flushing the memory using an address in the
> kernel's map. This does not work in several of the newly allowed
> cases such as dcache_clean_inval_poc(). Check whether the targeted pfn
> and its mapping KVA is valid in case the FWB is absent before
> continuing.

Looking at this more closely, it relies on kvm_pte_follow() which
ultimately calls __va(), and the ARM 64 version of page_to_virt() is:

#define page_to_virt(x) ({                                              \
        __typeof__(x) __page = x;                                       \
        void *__addr = __va(page_to_phys(__page));                      \
        (void *)__tag_set((const void *)__addr, page_kasan_tag(__page));\
})

So we don't actually have an issue here, anything with a struct page
will be properly handled by KVM.

Thus this can just be:

	if (!stage2_has_fwb(pgt) && !pfn_valid(pfn)))

Then the last paragraph of the commit message is:

 As cachable vs device memory is now determined by the VMA adjust
 the other checks to match their purpose. In most cases the code needs
 to know if there is a struct page, or if the memory is in the kernel
 map and pfn_valid() is an appropriate API for this.

 Note when FWB is not enabled, the kernel expects to trivially do
 cache management by flushing the memory by linearly converting a
 kvm_pte to phys_addr to a KVA, see kvm_flush_dcache_to_poc(). This is
 only possibile for struct page backed memory. Do not allow non-struct
 page memory to be cachable without FWB.

> @@ -1490,6 +1499,18 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	mte_allowed = kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Figure out the memory type based on the user va mapping properties
> +	 * Only MT_DEVICE_nGnRE and MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE will be set using
> +	 * pgprot_device() and pgprot_noncached() respectively.
> +	 */
> +	if ((mapping_type(vma->vm_page_prot) == MT_DEVICE_nGnRE) ||
> +	    (mapping_type(vma->vm_page_prot) == MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE) ||
> +	    (mapping_type(vma->vm_page_prot) == MT_NORMAL_NC))
> +		prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE;
> +	else if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC))
> +		prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
> +
>  	/* Don't use the VMA after the unlock -- it may have vanished */
>  	vma = NULL;
>  
> @@ -1576,10 +1597,21 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	if (exec_fault)
>  		prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;

You still didn't remove the kvm_is_device_pfn() check from this code,
I don't think it can really stay and make any sense..

Probably this:

   if (exec_fault && (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE))
		return -ENOEXEC;

And these two should also be pfn_valid() [precompute pfn_valid]

	if (vma_pagesize == PAGE_SIZE && !(force_pte || !pfn_valid(pte))) {

	if (fault_status != ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM && pfn_valid(pte) && kvm_has_mte(kvm)) {

Makes sense?

Check if kvm_is_device_pfn() can be removed entirely.

Jason

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel