From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
will@kernel.org, aniketa@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com,
kwankhede@nvidia.com, targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
acurrid@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
danw@nvidia.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 17:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPtOl7EqLzMusuIX@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907181459.18145-3-ankita@nvidia.com>
+ Lorenzo
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 11:14:59AM -0700, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
>
> Linux allows device drivers to map IO memory on a per-page basis using
> "write combining" or WC. This is often done using
> pgprot_writecombing(). The driver knows which pages can support WC
> access and the proper programming model to generate this IO. Generally
> the use case is to boost performance by using write combining to
> generate larger PCIe MemWr TLPs.
>
> Allow VMs to select DEVICE_* or NORMAL_NC on a page by page basis for
> all IO memory. This puts the VM in charge of the memory attributes,
> and removes the KVM override to DEVICE_nGnRE.
>
> Ultimately this makes pgprot_writecombing() work correctly in VMs and
> allows drivers like mlx5 to fully operate their HW.
>
> After some discussions with ARM and CPU architects we reached the
> conclusion there was no need for KVM to prevent the VM from selecting
> between DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory in VMs. There was a fear
> that NORMAL_NC could result in uncontained failures, but upon deeper
> analysis it turns out there are already possible cases for uncontained
> failures with DEVICE types too. Ultimately the platform must be
> implemented in a way that ensures that all DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC
> accesses have no uncontained failures.
>
> Fortunately real platforms do tend to implement this.
>
> This patch makes the VM's memory attributes behave as follows:
>
> S1 | S2 | Result
> NORMAL-WB | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-WT | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC | NORMAL-NC
> DEVICE<attr> | NORMAL-NC | DEVICE<attr>
>
> See section D8.5.5 of DDI0487_I_a_a-profile_architecture_reference_manual.pdf
> for details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>
From the discussions with the hardware people in Arm and Nvidia, we
indeed concluded that relaxing S2 to Normal-NC is not any worse than
Device (and actually Device memory is more prone to generating
uncontained errors, something to do with the Device memory ordering
semantics).
For this change:
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-08 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-07 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] KVM: arm64: support write combining and cachable IO memory in VMs ankita
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: arm64: determine memory type from VMA ankita
2023-09-07 19:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-05 16:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-10 17:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-10 18:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-11 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-11 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-03-10 3:49 ` Ankit Agrawal
2024-03-19 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-23 13:20 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-09-07 18:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] KVM: arm64: allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory ankita
2023-09-08 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-09-11 14:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-11 17:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-13 15:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-13 18:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26 8:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-09-26 12:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-26 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-26 16:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05 9:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-05 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-05 14:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 12:35 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 14:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-12 13:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 14:48 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 15:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-12 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 18:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-13 9:29 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-12 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13 9:29 ` Will Deacon
2023-10-13 13:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-13 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 11:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-19 11:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 11:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-20 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-20 14:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-20 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-10-19 13:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-13 15:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-19 11:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-11-09 15:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-10 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-13 0:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-11-13 17:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-12 12:27 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZPtOl7EqLzMusuIX@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).