public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	amit.kachhap@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	sumitg@nvidia.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com, Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the target core awake when reading its cpufreq rate
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:54:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTjz2Ox_iqorbejw@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231025093847.3740104-3-zengheng4@huawei.com>

[adding Ionela]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 05:38:46PM +0800, Zeng Heng wrote:
> As ARM AMU's document says, all counters are subject to any changes
> in clock frequency, including clock stopping caused by the WFI and WFE
> instructions.
> 
> Therefore, using smp_call_on_cpu() to trigger target CPU to
> read self's AMU counters, which ensures the counters are working
> properly while cstate feature is enabled.

IIUC there's a pretty deliberate split with all the actual reading of the AMU
living in arch/arm64/kernel/topolgy.c, and the driver code being (relatively)
generic.

We already have code in arch/arm64/kernel/topolgy.c to read counters on a
specific CPU; why can't e reuse that (and avoid exporting cpu_has_amu_feat())?

Mark.

> 
> Reported-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230418113459.12860-7-sumitg@nvidia.com/
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index fe08ca419b3d..321a9dc9484d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,12 @@ static int cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
>  				 struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t0,
>  				 struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t1);
>  
> +struct fb_ctr_pair {
> +	u32 cpu;
> +	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0;
> +	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t1;
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * cppc_scale_freq_workfn - CPPC arch_freq_scale updater for frequency invariance
>   * @work: The work item.
> @@ -840,9 +846,24 @@ static int cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
>  	return (reference_perf * delta_delivered) / delta_reference;
>  }
>  
> +static int cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair(void *val)
> +{
> +	struct fb_ctr_pair *fb_ctrs = val;
> +	int cpu = fb_ctrs->cpu;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */
> +
> +	return cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs->fb_ctrs_t1);
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0 = {0}, fb_ctrs_t1 = {0};
> +	struct fb_ctr_pair fb_ctrs = { .cpu = cpu, };
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>  	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
>  	u64 delivered_perf;
> @@ -850,18 +871,18 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>  
> -	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t0);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	udelay(2); /* 2usec delay between sampling */
> +	if (cpu_has_amu_feat(cpu))
> +		ret = smp_call_on_cpu(cpu, cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair,
> +				      &fb_ctrs, false);
> +	else
> +		ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs_pair(&fb_ctrs);
>  
> -	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs_t1);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	delivered_perf = cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(cpu_data, &fb_ctrs_t0,
> -					       &fb_ctrs_t1);
> +	delivered_perf = cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(cpu_data,
> +					      &fb_ctrs.fb_ctrs_t0,
> +					      &fb_ctrs.fb_ctrs_t1);
>  
>  	return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu_data, delivered_perf);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-25 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25  9:38 [PATCH 0/3] Make the cpuinfo_cur_freq interface read correctly Zeng Heng
2023-10-25  9:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: Export cpu_has_amu_feat() Zeng Heng
2023-10-25  9:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the target core awake when reading its cpufreq rate Zeng Heng
2023-10-25 10:54   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-10-25 14:57     ` Sumit Gupta
2023-10-30 13:19       ` Beata Michalska
2023-10-26  3:21     ` Zeng Heng
2023-10-25 11:13   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-26  2:24     ` Zeng Heng
2023-10-26  8:53       ` Sudeep Holla
2023-10-26  9:05         ` Zeng Heng
2023-10-31 23:52   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-25  9:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: CPPC: Eliminate the impact of cpc_read() latency error Zeng Heng
2023-10-25 11:01   ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-26  1:55     ` Zeng Heng
2023-10-26 11:26       ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTjz2Ox_iqorbejw@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox