From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4217CC4332F for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:00:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2gBSTLeQ9G4RZZQGTPjNuvBiIJacFUSSIljdj2ZyDu0=; b=ajWv50CnsgdrgX FGBz2PEejW0vW+PXC+6uYTrREAuN6uOhPlodTgmnV8IOqy7iQ5IW5XIyHVvXuUsyLNNAieq5dmhKO bum/uAC5VL4fmidwWe5tka6T8srHQsRI0zeWe62iFTJEPh9ae0cz2X3qlA0qcF3DUMH1MmaFmJ5YK cZmg5jexPObZrAznCBLVSx7cywQj+7mr4TAQECYYxoN8/hEgMPD22YVrJuv48x/FKfBEcGu6h0v8T G/ITWLoKFCxh4W2cXF4sq8bsZF6KQspFmk9kXXi5x34ySB56wCNcXqwIMBGAcZVXyxvDL2Inl66yH XrFNqZ9QFeI6geoXtBZw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyb2e-009w9L-2X; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 16:59:36 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qyb2b-009w8c-2R for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2023 16:59:35 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8972F4; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com (FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.27.166]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1FDF3F738; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:59:26 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Puranjay Mohan Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Zi Shen Lim , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/1] bpf, arm64: support exceptions Message-ID: References: <20230917000045.56377-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> <20230917000045.56377-2-puranjay12@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230917000045.56377-2-puranjay12@gmail.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231102_095933_886753_DF313031 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:00:45AM +0000, Puranjay Mohan wrote: > Implement arch_bpf_stack_walk() for the ARM64 JIT. This will be used > by bpf_throw() to unwind till the program marked as exception boundary and > run the callback with the stack of the main program. > > The prologue generation code has been modified to make the callback > program use the stack of the program marked as exception boundary where > callee-saved registers are already pushed. > > As the bpf_throw function never returns, if it clobbers any callee-saved > registers, they would remain clobbered. So, the prologue of the > exception-boundary program is modified to push R23 and R24 as well, > which the callback will then recover in its epilogue. > > The Procedure Call Standard for the Arm 64-bit Architecture[1] states > that registers r19 to r28 should be saved by the callee. BPF programs on > ARM64 already save all callee-saved registers except r23 and r24. This > patch adds an instruction in prologue of the program to save these > two registers and another instruction in the epilogue to recover them. > > These extra instructions are only added if bpf_throw() used. Otherwise > the emitted prologue/epilogue remains unchanged. > > [1] https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst > > Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan > --- [...] > +void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp), void *cookie) > +{ > + struct stack_info stacks[] = { > + stackinfo_get_task(current), > + }; Can bpf_throw() only be used by BPF programs that run in task context, or is it possible e.g. for those to run within an IRQ handler (or otherwise on the IRQ stack)? > + > + struct unwind_state state = { > + .stacks = stacks, > + .nr_stacks = ARRAY_SIZE(stacks), > + }; > + unwind_init_common(&state, current); > + state.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1); > + state.pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0); > + > + if (unwind_next_frame_record(&state)) > + return; > + while (1) { > + /* We only use the fp in the exception callback. Pass 0 for sp as it's unavailable*/ > + if (!consume_fn(cookie, (u64)state.pc, 0, (u64)state.fp)) > + break; > + if (unwind_next_frame_record(&state)) > + break; > + } > +} IIUC you're not using arch_stack_walk() because you need the FP in addition to the PC. Is there any other reason you need to open-code this? If not, I'd rather rework the common unwinder so that it's possible to get at the FP. I had patches for that a while back: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/stacktrace/metadata ... and I'm happy to rebase that and pull out the minimum necessary to make that possible. Mark. > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > index f5065576cae9..7f768d335698 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 > @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ > bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api # kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3 > bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api # kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3 > -exceptions # JIT does not support calling kfunc bpf_throw: -524 > fexit_sleep # The test never returns. The remaining tests cannot start. > kprobe_multi_bench_attach # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 > kprobe_multi_test/attach_api_addrs # bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95 > -- > 2.40.1 > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel