From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59458C4167B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:00:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HJAT251IKeCa+ZOLQ3AmC0O1aF9KbXneLaRMdK5VWPo=; b=TvPKm8U+hEqqhd X+uWbDVqPH/28ull4iclbM701fAHP+LfWsYOLt0vF/Ml299yVuyOg7FasvtBp678AgO/n5hZXrrX8 HnaJHnztXv94BVje6Aj7LRI7q0ALd/+n+RR1yj7AhhVpk33me2OyspemI5m40czI/Kh8E7YfDolT5 LTe7N0ei+AfcPc5EDsSRmYDB6+IM3We1U6ZvL4DRFC2WgtVJcSEFFp/vUaDrLOu0LLh73Sc552mLp Ev+AhiwUkyp2uyrhx4DOqeCcMP8SlJsL8FlnzcoGuTOqTbpt/8ahURUHZ3CXHE7Civ690IXp9B4sv iZMaCf/LOY39qU+eFz1A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r8fiS-00Am4b-0N; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:00:24 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1r8fiO-00Am1Y-13 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:00:21 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31898143D; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 04:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from raptor (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0BD73F5A1; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 04:00:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:00:11 +0000 From: Alexandru Elisei To: Hyesoo Yu Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, pcc@google.com, steven.price@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, david@redhat.com, eugenis@google.com, kcc@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 15/27] arm64: mte: Check that tag storage blocks are in the same zone Message-ID: References: <20231119165721.9849-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> <20231119165721.9849-16-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> <20231129085744.GB2988384@tiffany> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231129085744.GB2988384@tiffany> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231130_040020_462517_6BC600D7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 05:57:44PM +0900, Hyesoo Yu wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:57:09PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > alloc_contig_range() requires that the requested pages are in the same > > zone. Check that this is indeed the case before initializing the tag > > storage blocks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c > > index 8b9bedf7575d..fd63430d4dc0 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte_tag_storage.c > > @@ -265,6 +265,35 @@ void __init mte_tag_storage_init(void) > > } > > } > > > > +/* alloc_contig_range() requires all pages to be in the same zone. */ > > +static int __init mte_tag_storage_check_zone(void) > > +{ > > + struct range *tag_range; > > + struct zone *zone; > > + unsigned long pfn; > > + u32 block_size; > > + int i, j; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_tag_regions; i++) { > > + block_size = tag_regions[i].block_size; > > + if (block_size == 1) > > + continue; > > + > > + tag_range = &tag_regions[i].tag_range; > > + for (pfn = tag_range->start; pfn <= tag_range->end; pfn += block_size) { > > + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)); > > Hello. > > Since the blocks within the tag_range must all be in the same zone, can we move the "page_zone" > out of the loop ? Hmm.. why do you say that the pages in a tag_range must be in the same zone? I am not very familiar with how the memory management code puts pages into zones, but I would imagine that pages in a tag range straddling the 4GB limit (so, let's say, from 3GB to 5GB) will end up in both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_NORMAL. Thanks, Alex > > Thanks, > Regards. > > > + for (j = 1; j < block_size; j++) { > > + if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn + j)) != zone) { > > + pr_err("Tag storage block pages in different zones"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + } > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > static int __init mte_tag_storage_activate_regions(void) > > { > > phys_addr_t dram_start, dram_end; > > @@ -321,6 +350,10 @@ static int __init mte_tag_storage_activate_regions(void) > > goto out_disabled; > > } > > > > + ret = mte_tag_storage_check_zone(); > > + if (ret) > > + goto out_disabled; > > + > > for (i = 0; i < num_tag_regions; i++) { > > tag_range = &tag_regions[i].tag_range; > > for (pfn = tag_range->start; pfn <= tag_range->end; pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) > > -- > > 2.42.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel