linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions
@ 2023-12-07  9:33 Peng Fan (OSS)
  2023-12-07  9:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden Peng Fan (OSS)
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2023-12-07  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sudeep.holla, cristian.marussi, mturquette, sboyd
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan,
	glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3, chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

ARM SCMI Spec 3.2 introduces Clock Get Permission command. This patch
is to add the support. Add three bool entries to scmi_clock_info to
indicate the operation is forbidden or not. If the CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS
command is not supported, the three bool variables will default
set to false, otherwise they will be set according to the return result
of CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---

V2:
 Take Cristian's suggestion, https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZWiqqfQ73tezFmSk@pluto/

 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/scmi_protocol.h     |  4 +++
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index 98511a3aa367..0e048530bea2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ enum scmi_clock_protocol_cmd {
 	CLOCK_POSSIBLE_PARENTS_GET = 0xC,
 	CLOCK_PARENT_SET = 0xD,
 	CLOCK_PARENT_GET = 0xE,
+	CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS = 0xF,
 };
 
+#define CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(31)
+#define CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(30)
+#define CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(29)
+
 enum clk_state {
 	CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
 	CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
@@ -46,6 +51,7 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_attributes {
 #define SUPPORTS_RATE_CHANGE_REQUESTED_NOTIF(x)	((x) & BIT(30))
 #define SUPPORTS_EXTENDED_NAMES(x)		((x) & BIT(29))
 #define SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(x)		((x) & BIT(28))
+#define SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(x)		((x) & BIT(1))
 	u8 name[SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE];
 	__le32 clock_enable_latency;
 };
@@ -281,6 +287,35 @@ static int scmi_clock_possible_parents(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u3
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int
+scmi_clock_get_permissions(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
+			   struct scmi_clock_info *clk)
+{
+	struct scmi_xfer *t;
+	u32 perm;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS,
+				      sizeof(clk_id), sizeof(perm), &t);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	put_unaligned_le32(clk_id, t->tx.buf);
+
+	ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
+	if (!ret) {
+		perm = get_unaligned_le32(t->rx.buf);
+
+		clk->state_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
+		clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
+		clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
+	}
+
+	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 				     u32 clk_id, struct scmi_clock_info *clk,
 				     u32 version)
@@ -307,6 +342,7 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 		if (PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(version) >= 0x2)
 			latency = le32_to_cpu(attr->clock_enable_latency);
 		clk->enable_latency = latency ? : U32_MAX;
+		clk->attributes = attributes;
 	}
 
 	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
@@ -327,6 +363,8 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 			clk->rate_change_requested_notifications = true;
 		if (SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(attributes))
 			scmi_clock_possible_parents(ph, clk_id, clk);
+		if (SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(attributes))
+			scmi_clock_get_permissions(ph, clk_id, clk);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
@@ -499,6 +537,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 	struct scmi_xfer *t;
 	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+
+	if (clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden)
+		return -EACCES;
 
 	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_RATE_SET, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
 	if (ret)
@@ -585,6 +627,9 @@ scmi_clock_set_parent(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 	if (parent_id >= clk->num_parents)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden)
+		return -EACCES;
+
 	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_PARENT_SET,
 				      sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
 	if (ret)
@@ -668,6 +713,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_enable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 			     bool atomic)
 {
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+
+	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
+		return -EACCES;
 
 	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
 				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
@@ -677,6 +726,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_disable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 			      bool atomic)
 {
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+
+	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
+		return -EACCES;
 
 	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
 				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index f2f05fb42d28..ad75784b567b 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
 	bool rate_discrete;
 	bool rate_changed_notifications;
 	bool rate_change_requested_notifications;
+	bool state_ctrl_forbidden;
+	bool rate_ctrl_forbidden;
+	bool parent_ctrl_forbidden;
 	union {
 		struct {
 			int num_rates;
@@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
 	};
 	int num_parents;
 	u32 *parents;
+	u32 attributes;
 };
 
 enum scmi_power_scale {
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden
  2023-12-07  9:33 [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2023-12-07  9:33 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
  2024-01-10 15:40   ` Cristian Marussi
  2024-01-09  1:06 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan
  2024-01-10 15:19 ` Cristian Marussi
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan (OSS) @ 2023-12-07  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sudeep.holla, cristian.marussi, mturquette, sboyd
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan,
	glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3, chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Some clocks may exported to linux, while those clocks are not allowed
to configure by Linux. For example:

SYS_CLK1-----
             \
	     --MUX--->MMC1_CLK
             /
SYS_CLK2-----

MMC1 needs set parent, so SYS_CLK1 and SYS_CLK2 are exported to Linux,
then the clk propagation will touch SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2.
So we need bypass the failure for SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2 when enable
the clock of MMC1.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---

V2:
 New. Take Cristian's suggestion

 drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
index 8cbe24789c24..1d809813eabd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
@@ -119,8 +119,14 @@ static int scmi_clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *r
 static int scmi_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
 {
 	struct scmi_clk *clk = to_scmi_clk(hw);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = scmi_proto_clk_ops->enable(clk->ph, clk->id, NOT_ATOMIC);
 
-	return scmi_proto_clk_ops->enable(clk->ph, clk->id, NOT_ATOMIC);
+	if (ret == -EACCES && clk->info->state_ctrl_forbidden)
+		return 0;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void scmi_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
-- 
2.37.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions
  2023-12-07  9:33 [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan (OSS)
  2023-12-07  9:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2024-01-09  1:06 ` Peng Fan
  2024-01-09  8:43   ` Cristian Marussi
  2024-01-10 15:19 ` Cristian Marussi
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-01-09  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: sudeep.holla, cristian.marussi, mturquette, sboyd
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan,
	glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3, chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

Hi Sudeep, Cristian,

Are you ok with this patchset? It's been pending for 1 month.

Thanks,
Peng.

On 12/7/2023 5:33 PM, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> ARM SCMI Spec 3.2 introduces Clock Get Permission command. This patch
> is to add the support. Add three bool entries to scmi_clock_info to
> indicate the operation is forbidden or not. If the CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS
> command is not supported, the three bool variables will default
> set to false, otherwise they will be set according to the return result
> of CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V2:
>   Take Cristian's suggestion, https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZWiqqfQ73tezFmSk@pluto/
> 
>   drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/scmi_protocol.h     |  4 +++
>   2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> index 98511a3aa367..0e048530bea2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ enum scmi_clock_protocol_cmd {
>   	CLOCK_POSSIBLE_PARENTS_GET = 0xC,
>   	CLOCK_PARENT_SET = 0xD,
>   	CLOCK_PARENT_GET = 0xE,
> +	CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS = 0xF,
>   };
>   
> +#define CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(31)
> +#define CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(30)
> +#define CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(29)
> +
>   enum clk_state {
>   	CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
>   	CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
> @@ -46,6 +51,7 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_attributes {
>   #define SUPPORTS_RATE_CHANGE_REQUESTED_NOTIF(x)	((x) & BIT(30))
>   #define SUPPORTS_EXTENDED_NAMES(x)		((x) & BIT(29))
>   #define SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(x)		((x) & BIT(28))
> +#define SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(x)		((x) & BIT(1))
>   	u8 name[SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE];
>   	__le32 clock_enable_latency;
>   };
> @@ -281,6 +287,35 @@ static int scmi_clock_possible_parents(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u3
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +scmi_clock_get_permissions(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
> +			   struct scmi_clock_info *clk)
> +{
> +	struct scmi_xfer *t;
> +	u32 perm;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS,
> +				      sizeof(clk_id), sizeof(perm), &t);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	put_unaligned_le32(clk_id, t->tx.buf);
> +
> +	ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		perm = get_unaligned_le32(t->rx.buf);
> +
> +		clk->state_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +		clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +		clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +	}
> +
> +	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>   				     u32 clk_id, struct scmi_clock_info *clk,
>   				     u32 version)
> @@ -307,6 +342,7 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>   		if (PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(version) >= 0x2)
>   			latency = le32_to_cpu(attr->clock_enable_latency);
>   		clk->enable_latency = latency ? : U32_MAX;
> +		clk->attributes = attributes;
>   	}
>   
>   	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> @@ -327,6 +363,8 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>   			clk->rate_change_requested_notifications = true;
>   		if (SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(attributes))
>   			scmi_clock_possible_parents(ph, clk_id, clk);
> +		if (SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(attributes))
> +			scmi_clock_get_permissions(ph, clk_id, clk);
>   	}
>   
>   	return ret;
> @@ -499,6 +537,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>   	struct scmi_xfer *t;
>   	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
>   	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> +	if (clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>   
>   	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_RATE_SET, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
>   	if (ret)
> @@ -585,6 +627,9 @@ scmi_clock_set_parent(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>   	if (parent_id >= clk->num_parents)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> +	if (clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
>   	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_PARENT_SET,
>   				      sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
>   	if (ret)
> @@ -668,6 +713,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_enable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>   			     bool atomic)
>   {
>   	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> +	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>   
>   	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
>   				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> @@ -677,6 +726,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_disable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>   			      bool atomic)
>   {
>   	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> +	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>   
>   	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
>   				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> index f2f05fb42d28..ad75784b567b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
>   	bool rate_discrete;
>   	bool rate_changed_notifications;
>   	bool rate_change_requested_notifications;
> +	bool state_ctrl_forbidden;
> +	bool rate_ctrl_forbidden;
> +	bool parent_ctrl_forbidden;
>   	union {
>   		struct {
>   			int num_rates;
> @@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
>   	};
>   	int num_parents;
>   	u32 *parents;
> +	u32 attributes;
>   };
>   
>   enum scmi_power_scale {

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions
  2024-01-09  1:06 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan
@ 2024-01-09  8:43   ` Cristian Marussi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2024-01-09  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peng Fan
  Cc: sudeep.holla, mturquette, sboyd, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk,
	linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan, glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3,
	chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:06:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sudeep, Cristian,
> 

Hi,

I have not forgot, I'll have a look this week.

Thanks,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions
  2023-12-07  9:33 [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan (OSS)
  2023-12-07  9:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden Peng Fan (OSS)
  2024-01-09  1:06 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan
@ 2024-01-10 15:19 ` Cristian Marussi
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2024-01-10 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peng Fan (OSS)
  Cc: sudeep.holla, mturquette, sboyd, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk,
	linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan, glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3,
	chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:33:44PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 

Hi Peng,

a few remarks down below, but generally LGTM.

>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions

till now we never added a <proto>: tag just "firmware: arm_scmi:",
capitalizing the first word. (not saying that using "clock:" is bad but
since we never used till now...), as an example

	firmware: arm_scmi: Implement Clock get permissions


> ARM SCMI Spec 3.2 introduces Clock Get Permission command. This patch
> is to add the support. Add three bool entries to scmi_clock_info to
> indicate the operation is forbidden or not. If the CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS
> command is not supported, the three bool variables will default
> set to false, otherwise they will be set according to the return result
> of CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V2:
>  Take Cristian's suggestion, https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZWiqqfQ73tezFmSk@pluto/
> 
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/scmi_protocol.h     |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> index 98511a3aa367..0e048530bea2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> @@ -25,8 +25,13 @@ enum scmi_clock_protocol_cmd {
>  	CLOCK_POSSIBLE_PARENTS_GET = 0xC,
>  	CLOCK_PARENT_SET = 0xD,
>  	CLOCK_PARENT_GET = 0xE,
> +	CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS = 0xF,
>  };
>  
> +#define CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(31)
> +#define CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(30)
> +#define CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED	BIT(29)
> +
>  enum clk_state {
>  	CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
>  	CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
> @@ -46,6 +51,7 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_attributes {
>  #define SUPPORTS_RATE_CHANGE_REQUESTED_NOTIF(x)	((x) & BIT(30))
>  #define SUPPORTS_EXTENDED_NAMES(x)		((x) & BIT(29))
>  #define SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(x)		((x) & BIT(28))
> +#define SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(x)		((x) & BIT(1))
>  	u8 name[SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE];
>  	__le32 clock_enable_latency;
>  };
> @@ -281,6 +287,35 @@ static int scmi_clock_possible_parents(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u3
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +scmi_clock_get_permissions(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
> +			   struct scmi_clock_info *clk)
> +{
> +	struct scmi_xfer *t;
> +	u32 perm;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_GET_PERMISSIONS,
> +				      sizeof(clk_id), sizeof(perm), &t);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	put_unaligned_le32(clk_id, t->tx.buf);
> +
> +	ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		perm = get_unaligned_le32(t->rx.buf);
> +
> +		clk->state_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_STATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +		clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_RATE_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +		clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden = !(perm & CLOCK_PARENT_CONTROL_ALLOWED);
> +	}
> +
> +	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>  				     u32 clk_id, struct scmi_clock_info *clk,
>  				     u32 version)
> @@ -307,6 +342,7 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>  		if (PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(version) >= 0x2)
>  			latency = le32_to_cpu(attr->clock_enable_latency);
>  		clk->enable_latency = latency ? : U32_MAX;
> +		clk->attributes = attributes;

Exposing the full attributes is NOT needed anymore now you have the bools right ?

>  	}
>  
>  	ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> @@ -327,6 +363,8 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>  			clk->rate_change_requested_notifications = true;
>  		if (SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(attributes))
>  			scmi_clock_possible_parents(ph, clk_id, clk);
> +		if (SUPPORTS_GET_PERMISSIONS(attributes))
> +			scmi_clock_get_permissions(ph, clk_id, clk);
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> @@ -499,6 +537,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
>  	struct scmi_xfer *t;
>  	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
>  	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +

This lacks a check on the provided clk_id bounds (just in case the
calling SCMI driver misbehaves)....in other protocols we have some
common internal helper to lookup a domain by id safely, it was still just
not added till today in Clock since not so much needed.

This seems not to be the case anymore, so today I posted this trivial:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240110120916.2482603-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com/

Please rebase on this and just use it also on this patch like::

--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index 51b21ce97cd5..01b372ac205f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -549,7 +549,11 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
 	struct scmi_xfer *t;
 	struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
-	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
+
+	clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, clk_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
 
 	if (clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden)
 		return -EACCES;
@@ -724,7 +728,11 @@ static int scmi_clock_enable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 			     bool atomic)
 {
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
-	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
+
+	clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, clk_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
 
 	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
 		return -EACCES;
@@ -737,7 +745,11 @@ static int scmi_clock_disable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
 			      bool atomic)
 {
 	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
-	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
+	struct scmi_clock_info *clk;
+
+	clk = scmi_clock_domain_lookup(ci, clk_id);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
 
 	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
 		return -EACCES;
---8<-------


> +	if (clk->rate_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>  
>  	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_RATE_SET, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -585,6 +627,9 @@ scmi_clock_set_parent(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>  	if (parent_id >= clk->num_parents)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	if (clk->parent_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
>  	ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_PARENT_SET,
>  				      sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -668,6 +713,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_enable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>  			     bool atomic)
>  {
>  	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;

Ditto.

> +
> +	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>  
>  	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
>  				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> @@ -677,6 +726,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_disable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
>  			      bool atomic)
>  {
>  	struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> +	struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
Ditto.
> +
> +	if (clk->state_ctrl_forbidden)
> +		return -EACCES;
>  
>  	return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
>  				    NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> index f2f05fb42d28..ad75784b567b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
>  	bool rate_discrete;
>  	bool rate_changed_notifications;
>  	bool rate_change_requested_notifications;
> +	bool state_ctrl_forbidden;
> +	bool rate_ctrl_forbidden;
> +	bool parent_ctrl_forbidden;
>  	union {
>  		struct {
>  			int num_rates;
> @@ -60,6 +63,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
>  	};
>  	int num_parents;
>  	u32 *parents;
> +	u32 attributes;

Ditto. Drop this.

Thanks,
Cristian


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden
  2023-12-07  9:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden Peng Fan (OSS)
@ 2024-01-10 15:40   ` Cristian Marussi
  2024-01-11  0:07     ` Peng Fan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2024-01-10 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peng Fan (OSS)
  Cc: sudeep.holla, mturquette, sboyd, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk,
	linux-kernel, ranjani.vaidyanathan, glen.wienecke, nitin.garg_3,
	chuck.cannon, Peng Fan

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:33:45PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Some clocks may exported to linux, while those clocks are not allowed
> to configure by Linux. For example:
> 

Hi,

> SYS_CLK1-----
>              \
> 	     --MUX--->MMC1_CLK
>              /
> SYS_CLK2-----
> 
> MMC1 needs set parent, so SYS_CLK1 and SYS_CLK2 are exported to Linux,
> then the clk propagation will touch SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2.
> So we need bypass the failure for SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2 when enable
> the clock of MMC1.
> 


So I was puzzled a bit at first (as said) by the fact that here we
silently swallow the failure if the SCMI Clock cannot be disabled, BUT
then I spotted in include/linux/clk.h

	/**
	 * clk_enable - inform the system when the clock source should be running.
	 * @clk: clock source
	 *
	 * If the clock can not be enabled/disabled, this should return success.

...so I suppose it is fine for the CLK framework at the end.

My next remaining question is why are you not doing the same when
(ret == -EACCES && clk->info->state_ctrl_forbidden) for atomic_ops ?

I.e. in:

	clk-scmi.c::static int scmi_clk_atomic_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)

Any particular reason (beside not needing it in your particular case...)

Thanks,
Cristian


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden
  2024-01-10 15:40   ` Cristian Marussi
@ 2024-01-11  0:07     ` Peng Fan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2024-01-11  0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cristian Marussi, Peng Fan (OSS)
  Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ranjani Vaidyanathan,
	Glen G Wienecke, Nitin Garg, Chuck Cannon

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden
> 
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:33:45PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > Some clocks may exported to linux, while those clocks are not allowed
> > to configure by Linux. For example:
> >
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > SYS_CLK1-----
> >              \
> > 	     --MUX--->MMC1_CLK
> >              /
> > SYS_CLK2-----
> >
> > MMC1 needs set parent, so SYS_CLK1 and SYS_CLK2 are exported to Linux,
> > then the clk propagation will touch SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2.
> > So we need bypass the failure for SYS_CLK1 or SYS_CLK2 when enable the
> > clock of MMC1.
> >
> 
> 
> So I was puzzled a bit at first (as said) by the fact that here we silently swallow
> the failure if the SCMI Clock cannot be disabled, BUT then I spotted in
> include/linux/clk.h
> 
> 	/**
> 	 * clk_enable - inform the system when the clock source should be
> running.
> 	 * @clk: clock source
> 	 *
> 	 * If the clock can not be enabled/disabled, this should return success.
> 
> ...so I suppose it is fine for the CLK framework at the end.
> 
> My next remaining question is why are you not doing the same when (ret == -
> EACCES && clk->info->state_ctrl_forbidden) for atomic_ops ?
> 
> I.e. in:
> 
> 	clk-scmi.c::static int scmi_clk_atomic_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> 
> Any particular reason (beside not needing it in your particular case...)

No particular reason, we not use atomic_ops in our case. So I am not able
to test it. I could add the same in atomic_ops in V3.

Thanks,
Peng.
> 
> Thanks,
> Cristian


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-11  0:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-07  9:33 [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan (OSS)
2023-12-07  9:33 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] clk: scmi: support state_ctrl_forbidden Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-01-10 15:40   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-01-11  0:07     ` Peng Fan
2024-01-09  1:06 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: implement get permissions Peng Fan
2024-01-09  8:43   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-01-10 15:19 ` Cristian Marussi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).