From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ross Stutterheim <ross.stutterheim@garmin.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ross.sweng@gmail.com,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm[64]/memremap: fix arch_memremap_can_ram_remap()
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_0SfqQHsKs3S1cn@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414133219.107455-1-ross.stutterheim@garmin.com>
Please cc the maintainers and the original contributor of the commit you
are fixing, otherwise the patch may not be noticed.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:32:19AM -0500, Ross Stutterheim wrote:
> commit 260364d112bc ("arm[64]/memremap: don't abuse pfn_valid() to ensure
> presence of linear map") added the definition of
> arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() for arm[64] specific filtering of what pages
> can be used from the linear mapping. memblock_is_map_memory() was called
> with the pfn of the address given to arch_memremap_can_ram_remap();
> however, memblock_is_map_memory() expects to be given an address, not a
> pfn.
>
> This results in calls to memremap() returning a newly mapped area when
> it should return an address in the existing linear mapping.
>
> Fix this by removing the address to pfn translation and pass the
> address directly.
>
> Fixes: 260364d112bc ("arm[64]/memremap: don't abuse pfn_valid() to ensure presence of linear map")
> Signed-off-by: Ross Stutterheim <ross.stutterheim@garmin.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c | 4 +---
> arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> index 748698e91a4b..27e64f782cb3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,5 @@ void __init early_ioremap_init(void)
> bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn = PHYS_PFN(offset);
> -
> - return memblock_is_map_memory(pfn);
> + return memblock_is_map_memory(offset);
> }
This indeed needs fixing.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> index 10e246f11271..48c38c986b95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,5 @@ void __init early_ioremap_init(void)
> bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn = PHYS_PFN(offset);
> -
> - return pfn_is_map_memory(pfn);
> + return pfn_is_map_memory(offset);
This is already correct.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 13:32 [PATCH] arm[64]/memremap: fix arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() Ross Stutterheim
2025-04-14 13:49 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-04-14 14:18 ` Ross Stutterheim
2025-04-14 14:21 ` [PATCH v2] arm/memremap: " Ross Stutterheim
2025-04-16 10:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-16 13:57 ` Ross Stutterheim
2025-04-16 15:48 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 22:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-19 7:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-16 11:13 ` Linus Walleij
2025-04-16 13:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Ross Stutterheim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_0SfqQHsKs3S1cn@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ross.stutterheim@garmin.com \
--cc=ross.sweng@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).