From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Introduce and use hardware-definition macros
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 15:46:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_BhKUAgkLCdeWDB@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404220659.1312465-2-rananta@google.com>
Hi Raghu,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:06:58PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> The kvm selftest library for arm64 currently configures the hardware
> fields, such as shift and mask in the page-table entries and registers,
> directly with numbers. While it add comments at places, it's better to
> rewrite them with appropriate macros to improve the readability and
> reduce the risk of errors. Hence, introduce macros to define the
> hardware fields and use them in the arm64 processor library.
>
> Most of the definitions are primary copied from the Linux's header,
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h.
Thank you for doing this. Having magic numbers all around the shop was a
complete mess. Just a single comment:
> No functional change intended.
>
> Suggested-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 38 +++++++++++++
> .../selftests/kvm/arm64/page_fault_test.c | 2 +-
> .../selftests/kvm/include/arm64/processor.h | 28 +++++++--
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/arm64/processor.c | 57 ++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 150416682e2c..6fcde168f3a6 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -884,6 +884,44 @@
> SCTLR_EL1_LSMAOE | SCTLR_EL1_nTLSMD | SCTLR_EL1_EIS | \
> SCTLR_EL1_TSCXT | SCTLR_EL1_EOS)
>
> +/* TCR_EL1 specific flags */
> +#define TCR_T0SZ_OFFSET 0
> +#define TCR_T0SZ(x) ((UL(64) - (x)) << TCR_T0SZ_OFFSET)
> +
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT 8
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_MASK (UL(3) << TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_NC (UL(0) << TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_WBWA (UL(1) << TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_WT (UL(2) << TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IRGN0_WBnWA (UL(3) << TCR_IRGN0_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT 10
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_MASK (UL(3) << TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_NC (UL(0) << TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_WBWA (UL(1) << TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_WT (UL(2) << TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_ORGN0_WBnWA (UL(3) << TCR_ORGN0_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define TCR_SH0_SHIFT 12
> +#define TCR_SH0_MASK (UL(3) << TCR_SH0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_SH0_INNER (UL(3) << TCR_SH0_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define TCR_TG0_SHIFT 14
> +#define TCR_TG0_MASK (UL(3) << TCR_TG0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_TG0_4K (UL(0) << TCR_TG0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_TG0_64K (UL(1) << TCR_TG0_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_TG0_16K (UL(2) << TCR_TG0_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define TCR_IPS_SHIFT 32
> +#define TCR_IPS_MASK (UL(7) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IPS_52_BITS (UL(6) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IPS_48_BITS (UL(5) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IPS_40_BITS (UL(2) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT)
> +#define TCR_IPS_36_BITS (UL(1) << TCR_IPS_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define TCR_HA (UL(1) << 39)
> +#define TCR_DS (UL(1) << 59)
> +
sysreg.h isn't the right home for these definitions since it is meant to
be a copy of the corresponding kernel header.
Since KVM selftests are likely the only thing in tools to care about
setting up page tables, adding this to processor.h seems like a better
place.
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 22:06 [PATCH 0/2] KVM : selftests: arm64: Explicitly set the page attrs to Inner-Shareable Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-04-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Introduce and use hardware-definition macros Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-04-04 22:46 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-04-04 22:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: arm64: Explicitly set the page attrs to Inner-Shareable Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2025-04-04 23:01 ` Oliver Upton
2025-04-05 0:01 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_BhKUAgkLCdeWDB@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).