linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	jsnitsel@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, ddutile@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add missing S2FWB feature detection
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 05:30:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_S0gVMuAqrv3R_v@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408033351.1012411-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 09:03:51AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> Commit 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> introduced S2FWB usage but omitted the corresponding feature detection.
> As a result, vIOMMU allocation fails on FVP in arm_vsmmu_alloc(), due to
> the following check:
> 
> 	if (!arm_smmu_master_canwbs(master) &&
> 	    !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB))
> 		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> 
> This patch adds the missing detection logic to prevent allocation
> failure when S2FWB is supported.
> 
> Fixes: 67e4fe398513 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use S2FWB for NESTED domains")
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 358072b4e293..c7d297ceabdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -4405,6 +4405,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR3);
>  	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_RIL, reg))
>  		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV;
> +	if (FIELD_GET(IDR3_FWB, reg))
> +		smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_S2FWB;
>  
>  	/* IDR5 */
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR5);

Indeed. Looks like setting the feature flag was missed previously.

Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>

Thanks,
Praan


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08  3:33 [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add missing S2FWB feature detection Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-04-08  5:30 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2025-04-08  7:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-04-08 12:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-11 16:03   ` Will Deacon
2025-04-17 14:27 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_S0gVMuAqrv3R_v@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).