From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Olivier Masse" <olivier.masse@nxp.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Yong Wu" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"T . J . Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com,
"Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniel Stone" <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] tee: implement restricted DMA-heap
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:44:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_To9V-JOKZ7ChhE@sumit-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44FpsCVrbwj1=nsJVJFVJSF1kzKdWAkAMXRu6EdLrLvh8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:33:04AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:58 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:55:46AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > Hi Sumit,
> > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include "tee_private.h"
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct tee_dma_heap {
> > > > > + struct dma_heap *heap;
> > > > > + enum tee_dma_heap_id id;
> > > > > + struct tee_rstmem_pool *pool;
> > > > > + struct tee_device *teedev;
> > > > > + /* Protects pool and teedev above */
> > > > > + struct mutex mu;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct tee_heap_buffer {
> > > > > + struct tee_rstmem_pool *pool;
> > > > > + struct tee_device *teedev;
> > > > > + size_t size;
> > > > > + size_t offs;
> > > > > + struct sg_table table;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct tee_heap_attachment {
> > > > > + struct sg_table table;
> > > > > + struct device *dev;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct tee_rstmem_static_pool {
> > > > > + struct tee_rstmem_pool pool;
> > > > > + struct gen_pool *gen_pool;
> > > > > + phys_addr_t pa_base;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#if !IS_MODULE(CONFIG_TEE) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS)
> > > >
> > > > Can this dependency rather be better managed via Kconfig?
> > >
> > > This was the easiest yet somewhat flexible solution I could find. If
> > > you have something better, let's use that instead.
> > >
> >
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config OPTEE
> > depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> > depends on MMU
> > depends on RPMB || !RPMB
> > + select DMABUF_HEAPS
> > help
> > This implements the OP-TEE Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)
> > driver.
>
> I wanted to avoid that since there are plenty of use cases where
> DMABUF_HEAPS aren't needed.
Yeah, but how the users will figure out the dependency to enable DMA
heaps with TEE subsystem. So it's better we provide a generic kernel
Kconfig which enables all the default features.
> This seems to do the job:
> +config TEE_DMABUF_HEAP
> + bool
> + depends on TEE = y && DMABUF_HEAPS
>
> We can only use DMABUF_HEAPS if the TEE subsystem is compiled into the kernel.
Ah, I see. So we aren't exporting the DMA heaps APIs for TEE subsystem
to use. We should do that such that there isn't a hard dependency to
compile them into the kernel.
-Sumit
>
> Cheers,
> Jens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 13:04 [PATCH v6 00/10] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] tee: tee_device_alloc(): copy dma_mask from parent device Jens Wiklander
2025-03-10 8:56 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] optee: pass parent device to tee_device_alloc() Jens Wiklander
2025-03-10 8:57 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] optee: account for direction while converting parameters Jens Wiklander
2025-03-13 10:41 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-17 7:42 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-20 9:25 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-20 13:00 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 5:55 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-25 8:50 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-01 7:45 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-01 8:21 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] optee: sync secure world ABI headers Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 6:20 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-27 7:41 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] tee: implement restricted DMA-heap Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 6:33 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-25 10:55 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-01 7:58 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-01 8:33 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-08 9:14 ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2025-04-08 13:28 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-09 12:50 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-10 6:49 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] tee: new ioctl to a register tee_shm from a dmabuf file descriptor Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 6:50 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-25 11:17 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-01 8:46 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-01 13:50 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] tee: add tee_shm_alloc_cma_phys_mem() Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 6:53 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] optee: support restricted memory allocation Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 7:07 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-25 13:55 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] optee: FF-A: dynamic " Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 7:41 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-27 8:07 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-01 10:13 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-01 12:26 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-08 9:20 ` Sumit Garg
2025-04-08 13:39 ` Jens Wiklander
2025-04-09 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-09 13:19 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-05 13:04 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] optee: smc abi: " Jens Wiklander
2025-03-25 7:45 ` Sumit Garg
2025-03-27 8:27 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_To9V-JOKZ7ChhE@sumit-X1 \
--to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.masse@nxp.com \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).