From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A08C36002 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:03:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rPUV8FgJegitXiVQUTfiLM1o0/uBOnP4q0gwO7/J0sw=; b=HyAUjr3wfnmC9jC4PZqynI2o+M NO5tuIanMo5XoqPqp2r553u7rKphIy3Vg25tc/CFqmSpb0tj15pRAvHLacDtN2KPFOH8TuE3aOfNJ L0YWMHQsMyUg5h9nbCL/1QqhP6lOe5r6TxQmPy30usytWwXJ3B4wkhohKAz3RyYnouatVM3unvBl8 pYUwdh/y/j0k8M4SU8BA+2e8zamYiksX53N2AY37u3dcYjjGZP4b7dCLq++xjjO/5KyHsEPjolOA5 bna6DahKmhM/fV11ZVy5+Qi1v8CMYEqlwCji3d+h2AknIs/9vLcOhGWE+Vrh4xHpUlSzWp2aFQFE8 TGL6IwLg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u2U9k-000000075Aw-329i; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 12:03:48 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u2U7y-000000074yF-0SIY for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2025 12:01:59 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B351715A1; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 05:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81AC03F59E; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:01:43 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Markus Elfring Cc: Sudeep Holla , Henry Martin , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Cristian Marussi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpufreq: scmi/scpi: Fix NULL pointer dereference in get_rate() Message-ID: References: <20250408150354.104532-1-bsdhenrymartin@gmail.com> <0558b7f7-8c69-4664-afc6-bae4fdc6f071@web.de> <20250409-merry-gay-lemur-8288cf@sudeepholla> <52aa52a5-7081-41ee-872e-f1728c06daf1@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <52aa52a5-7081-41ee-872e-f1728c06daf1@web.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250409_050158_185008_825A7EB3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 01:48:33PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Can any other summary phrase variants become more desirable accordingly? I agree with Sudeep, the above sentence is completely incomprehensible to me > > > > This is meaningless, sorry can't parse. Ignoring it as others in the > > community are doing already. > Do you care if the term “null pointer dereference” would be used in consistent ways? > ...this is more comprehensible, but again I cannot grasp what's yor advice specifically on this commit message. Thanks, Cristian