From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/82] arm: 3117/1: Refactor intentional wrap-around test
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:56:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Za-NRm5e_-Cfz1Nl@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240123002814.1396804-38-keescook@chromium.org>
The commit title is odd here; '3117/1' is the patch tracker name for the last
patch. The title should probably be:
arm: nwfpe: Refactor intentional wrap-around test
Mark.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:27:13PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
> unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
> kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
>
> VAR + value < VAR
>
> Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
> types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
> option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
> want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
> instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
> are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
> or pointer[4] types.
>
> Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
> This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.
>
> Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c b/arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c
> index ffa6b438786b..0635b1eda1d3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c
> @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ static floatx80
> roundBits = zSig0 & roundMask;
> if ( 0x7FFD <= (bits32) ( zExp - 1 ) ) {
> if ( ( 0x7FFE < zExp )
> - || ( ( zExp == 0x7FFE ) && ( zSig0 + roundIncrement < zSig0 ) )
> + || ( ( zExp == 0x7FFE ) && (add_would_overflow(zSig0, roundIncrement)) )
> ) {
> goto overflow;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240122235208.work.748-kees@kernel.org>
2024-01-23 0:26 ` [PATCH 11/82] arm64: atomics: lse: Silence intentional wrapping addition Kees Cook
2024-01-23 9:53 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-23 0:26 ` [PATCH 24/82] KVM: arm64: vgic: Refactor intentional wrap-around calculation Kees Cook
2024-01-23 10:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 15:13 ` Eric Auger
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 38/82] arm: 3117/1: Refactor intentional wrap-around test Kees Cook
2024-01-23 9:56 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-01-23 22:41 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 40/82] arm64: stacktrace: " Kees Cook
2024-01-23 9:58 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 57/82] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: " Kees Cook
2024-01-23 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 15:12 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Za-NRm5e_-Cfz1Nl@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox