From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AFBC47258 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:15:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Rwy1GNNfwDtnIkn1R93i9geyk4X198Yjxm1mrI0iYjQ=; b=BgvvWCgMHlvOAi CpxfBB+ICFc3QRieAuGcYza2LZU7NWNqiqJS7046aPvGoqNErQhy3gFZwxuYBLjGi0t11MEuchLR/ 5lPi2ZU5oY+j+DQNQDSao5RnDIe5No6OF4jYrgwosHcGKLQBfeHApRZZadwGgnOR5YL60rcZhGm0v C70g7Uso8gr0OKaFlUGJipaCuOzvLpZ7hrJ2GgwN4AG5+lc8BmyS6lqacWIAcCJS8Y/FiIFZwvCC/ /G92LcvgFPFv1MmrJ/zlrNdjP4PSCUAT57KXjiILeLgPeYGXoSS6V7+MAi7SIrjXH6y8YYdUGTNMg 6k7LqVEP0sN36kgS29bw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSDoX-00Ft8v-1g; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:15:29 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSDoT-00Ft8Y-33 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:15:27 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778521FB; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:16:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F35F3F5A1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:15:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:15:16 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sibi Sankar , cristian.marussi@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, Sudeep Holla , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, sboyd@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: scmi: Add boost frequency support Message-ID: References: <20240117110443.2060704-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com> <20240123060827.a3vszziftj6pszt3@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240123060827.a3vszziftj6pszt3@vireshk-i7> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240123_021526_033978_0D648D22 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:38:27AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-01-24, 16:34, Sibi Sankar wrote: > > This series adds provision to mark dynamic opps as boost capable and adds > > boost frequency support to the scmi cpufreq driver. > > > > Depends on: > > HW pressure v4: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20240109164655.626085-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org/ > > scmi notification v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20240117104116.2055349-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/ > > > > Sibi Sankar (3): > > OPP: Extend dev_pm_opp_data with turbo support > > firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for marking certain frequencies as > > boost > > cpufreq: scmi: Enable boost support > > Sudeep, please lemme know if you are okay with the changes. Will apply > them. I was planning to look at it once Lukasz/Dietmar confirm that this concept doesn't change anything fundamental in the way EAS related changes work today. I know I suggested the change as that seem to be right way to do but I haven't analysed if this has any negative impact on the existing features as this change will impact all the existing platform with OPPs above sustained performance/frequency advertised from the SCMI platform firmware. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel