linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Ruidong Tian <tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Add missing ERX*_EL1 registers
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:47:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaVFmtKbtCJtaAAu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <867ckh9y7l.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:20:30PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> If my reading of the ARM ARM is correct, these registers only exist if
> FEAT_RASv1p1 is implemented. Which means that we shouldn't handle
> those as RAZ/WI unconditionally, but instead check for what we
> advertise to the guest and handle it accordingly.

Can we go a step further and just stop advertising RAS to guests? I don't
expect VMs to gain much from our RAZ/WI implementation. Conditional
RAZ/WI would still be helpful in this case for migrated VMs that have
'seen' the feature.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-15 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-10  7:57 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Add missing ERX*_EL1 registers Ruidong Tian
2024-01-10 12:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-15 14:47   ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-01-15 17:21     ` James Morse
2024-01-16 15:38       ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZaVFmtKbtCJtaAAu@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).