From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, patches@amperecomputing.com,
rafael@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, kuba@kernel.org, vschneid@redhat.com,
mingo@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
rppt@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@google.com, mikelley@microsoft.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
cl@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NUMA: Early use of cpu_to_node() returns 0 instead of the correct node id
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:42:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zan9sb0vtSvVvQeA@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119033227.14113-1-shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:32:27AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> hZ7bkEvc+Z19RHkS/HVG3KMg
> X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM8PR01MB7144
> Status: O
> Content-Length: 3779
> Lines: 126
>
> During the kernel booting, the generic cpu_to_node() is called too early in
> arm64, powerpc and riscv when CONFIG_NUMA is enabled.
>
> There are at least four places in the common code where
> the generic cpu_to_node() is called before it is initialized:
> 1.) early_trace_init() in kernel/trace/trace.c
> 2.) sched_init() in kernel/sched/core.c
> 3.) init_sched_fair_class() in kernel/sched/fair.c
> 4.) workqueue_init_early() in kernel/workqueue.c
>
> In order to fix the bug, the patch changes generic cpu_to_node to
> function pointer, and export it for kernel modules.
> Introduce smp_prepare_boot_cpu_start() to wrap the original
> smp_prepare_boot_cpu(), and set cpu_to_node with early_cpu_to_node.
> Introduce smp_prepare_cpus_done() to wrap the original smp_prepare_cpus(),
> and set the cpu_to_node to formal _cpu_to_node().
This adds another level of indirection, I think. Currently cpu_to_node
is a simple inliner. After the patch it would be a real function with
all the associate overhead. Can you share a bloat-o-meter output here?
Regardless, I don't think that the approach is correct. As per your
description, some initialization functions erroneously call
cpu_to_node() instead of early_cpu_to_node() which exists specifically
for that case.
If the above correct, it's clearly a caller problem, and the fix is to
simply switch all those callers to use early version.
I would also initialize the numa_node with NUMA_NO_NODE at declaration,
so that if someone calls cpu_to_node() before the variable is properly
initialized at runtime, he'll get NO_NODE, which is obviously an error.
Thanks,
Yury
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 11 +++++++++++
> include/linux/topology.h | 6 ++----
> init/main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 5b59d133b6af..867a477fa975 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node);
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> +#ifndef cpu_to_node
> +int _cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> +{
> + return per_cpu(numa_node, cpu);
> +}
> +int (*cpu_to_node)(int cpu);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_to_node);
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> static void numa_update_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool remove)
> {
> int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 52f5850730b3..e7ce2bae11dd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -91,10 +91,8 @@ static inline int numa_node_id(void)
> #endif
>
> #ifndef cpu_to_node
> -static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> -{
> - return per_cpu(numa_node, cpu);
> -}
> +extern int (*cpu_to_node)(int cpu);
> +extern int _cpu_to_node(int cpu);
> #endif
>
> #ifndef set_numa_node
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index e24b0780fdff..b142e9c51161 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -870,6 +870,18 @@ static void __init print_unknown_bootoptions(void)
> memblock_free(unknown_options, len);
> }
>
> +static void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu_start(void)
> +{
> + smp_prepare_boot_cpu(); /* arch-specific boot-cpu hooks */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> +#ifndef cpu_to_node
> + /* The early_cpu_to_node should be ready now. */
> + cpu_to_node = early_cpu_to_node;
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> asmlinkage __visible __init __no_sanitize_address __noreturn __no_stack_protector
> void start_kernel(void)
> {
> @@ -899,7 +911,7 @@ void start_kernel(void)
> setup_command_line(command_line);
> setup_nr_cpu_ids();
> setup_per_cpu_areas();
> - smp_prepare_boot_cpu(); /* arch-specific boot-cpu hooks */
> + smp_prepare_boot_cpu_start();
> boot_cpu_hotplug_init();
>
> pr_notice("Kernel command line: %s\n", saved_command_line);
> @@ -1519,6 +1531,19 @@ void __init console_on_rootfs(void)
> fput(file);
> }
>
> +static void __init smp_prepare_cpus_done(unsigned int setup_max_cpus)
> +{
> + /* Different ARCHs may override smp_prepare_cpus() */
> + smp_prepare_cpus(setup_max_cpus);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> +#ifndef cpu_to_node
> + /* Change to the formal function. */
> + cpu_to_node = _cpu_to_node;
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
> {
> /* Now the scheduler is fully set up and can do blocking allocations */
> @@ -1531,7 +1556,7 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
>
> cad_pid = get_pid(t
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 3:32 [PATCH] NUMA: Early use of cpu_to_node() returns 0 instead of the correct node id Huang Shijie
2024-01-19 4:42 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2024-01-19 6:46 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-19 7:02 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-19 8:42 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-19 8:50 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-19 18:02 ` Yury Norov
2024-01-22 7:32 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-22 7:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-22 8:27 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-19 7:42 ` Shijie Huang
2024-01-19 5:35 ` Greg KH
2024-01-19 16:32 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zan9sb0vtSvVvQeA@yury-ThinkPad \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=patches@amperecomputing.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shijie@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).