linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Rongwei Wang <rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, pierre.gondois@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
	teng.ma@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA emulation for genertic arch
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:12:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdWUPlqsxC_y3YFM@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220113602.6943-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 07:36:00PM +0800, Rongwei Wang wrote:
> A brief introduction
> ====================
> 
> The NUMA emulation can fake more node base on a single
> node system, e.g.

... 
 
> Lastly, it seems not a good choice to realize x86 and other genertic
> archs separately. But it can indeed avoid some architecture related
> APIs adjustments and alleviate future maintenance.

Why is it a good choice? Copying 1k lines from x86 to a new place and
having to maintain two copies does not sound like a good choice to me.

> The previous RFC link see [1].
> 
> Any advice are welcome, Thanks!
> 
> Change log
> ==========
> 
> RFC v1 -> v1
> * add new CONFIG_NUMA_FAKE for genertic archs.
> * keep x86 implementation, realize numa emulation in driver/base/ for
>   genertic arch, e.g, arm64.
> 
> [1] RFC v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com/
> 
> Rongwei Wang (2):
>   arch_numa: remove __init for early_cpu_to_node
>   numa: introduce numa emulation for genertic arch
> 
>  drivers/base/Kconfig          |   9 +
>  drivers/base/Makefile         |   1 +
>  drivers/base/arch_numa.c      |  32 +-
>  drivers/base/numa_emulation.c | 909 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/base/numa_emulation.h |  41 ++
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h    |   2 +-
>  6 files changed, 992 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.32.0.3.gf3a3e56d6
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12  2:48 [PATCH RFC 0/5] support NUMA emulation for arm64 Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12  2:48 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] mm/numa: move numa emulation APIs into generic files Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12  6:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-12  2:48 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] mm: percpu: fix variable type of cpu Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12  2:48 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] arch_numa: remove __init in early_cpu_to_node() Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12  2:48 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] mm/numa: support CONFIG_NUMA_EMU for arm64 Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12  2:48 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] mm/numa: migrate leftover numa emulation into mm/numa.c Rongwei Wang
2023-10-12 12:37 ` [PATCH RFC 0/5] support NUMA emulation for arm64 Pierre Gondois
2023-10-12 13:30   ` Rongwei Wang
2023-10-23 13:03     ` Pierre Gondois
2024-02-20 11:36 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA emulation for genertic arch Rongwei Wang
2024-02-20 11:36   ` [PATCH v1 1/2] arch_numa: remove __init for early_cpu_to_node Rongwei Wang
2024-02-20 11:36   ` [PATCH v1 2/2] numa: introduce numa emulation for genertic arch Rongwei Wang
2024-02-21  6:12   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-02-21 15:51     ` [PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA " Pierre Gondois
2024-02-29  3:26       ` Rongwei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZdWUPlqsxC_y3YFM@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=teng.ma@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).