* [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
@ 2024-02-21 6:21 Randy Dunlap
2024-02-21 10:52 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-22 8:25 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2024-02-21 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Randy Dunlap, Sudeep Holla, Cristian Marussi, linux-arm-kernel
Fix the kernel-doc notation for the nested union in struct
scmi_optee_channel to eliminate kerenl-doc warnings:
optee.c:130: warning: Excess struct member 'shmem' description in 'scmi_optee_channel'
optee.c:131: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'req' not described in 'scmi_optee_channel'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
@@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ enum scmi_optee_pta_cmd {
* @rx_len: Response size
* @mu: Mutex protection on channel access
* @cinfo: SCMI channel information
- * @shmem: Virtual base address of the shared memory
- * @req: Shared memory protocol handle for SCMI request and synchronous response
+ * @req: union for SCMI interface
+ * @req.shmem: Virtual base address of the shared memory
+ * @req.msg: Shared memory protocol handle for SCMI request and
+ * synchronous response
* @tee_shm: TEE shared memory handle @req or NULL if using IOMEM shmem
* @link: Reference in agent's channel list
*/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
2024-02-21 6:21 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap
@ 2024-02-21 10:52 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-22 8:25 ` Sudeep Holla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2024-02-21 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap; +Cc: linux-kernel, Sudeep Holla, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:21:57PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix the kernel-doc notation for the nested union in struct
> scmi_optee_channel to eliminate kerenl-doc warnings:
>
> optee.c:130: warning: Excess struct member 'shmem' description in 'scmi_optee_channel'
> optee.c:131: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'req' not described in 'scmi_optee_channel'
Thanks for this, I've spotted it recently and didn't get time to address it.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cristian
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
> @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ enum scmi_optee_pta_cmd {
> * @rx_len: Response size
> * @mu: Mutex protection on channel access
> * @cinfo: SCMI channel information
> - * @shmem: Virtual base address of the shared memory
> - * @req: Shared memory protocol handle for SCMI request and synchronous response
> + * @req: union for SCMI interface
> + * @req.shmem: Virtual base address of the shared memory
> + * @req.msg: Shared memory protocol handle for SCMI request and
> + * synchronous response
> * @tee_shm: TEE shared memory handle @req or NULL if using IOMEM shmem
> * @link: Reference in agent's channel list
> */
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
2024-02-21 6:21 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap
2024-02-21 10:52 ` Cristian Marussi
@ 2024-02-22 8:25 ` Sudeep Holla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2024-02-22 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Randy Dunlap
Cc: Sudeep Holla, Cristian Marussi, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:21:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix the kernel-doc notation for the nested union in struct
> scmi_optee_channel to eliminate kerenl-doc warnings:
>
> optee.c:130: warning: Excess struct member 'shmem' description in 'scmi_optee_channel'
> optee.c:131: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'req' not described in 'scmi_optee_channel'
>
>
> [...]
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/updates), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/a9c049f47e06
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-22 8:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-21 6:21 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap
2024-02-21 10:52 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-02-22 8:25 ` Sudeep Holla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).