From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C1CC48BF6 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cwE2TkV4dRPuSydv10Z4igNyxYZakxWGBjogwmsKdYA=; b=TMbBkeBUsjfSFj msdUUjPJzwXrwEz7LanmV5mHJBDVQScL2OBAFhgumxOwQFiq+X2oBNephsF7QBX8qhyZ9+XQhJRJf f9nd6CKsSTq8k2GUM6khWN5wROp1Zcf1h2fXruDlWPchNXQ2VFwkkZlEdBRgU8hy/HEQxiHlYpx/9 VEpTql2evOtok8ZI/6qPb5VcqhO1dHduEgcCONj3yy8QwtDuyWSYtJXWazXrP6ul+FuKdEj3iyuNY 8g/+Bik+Qv5P5ZvUSoVOMWWoelqoz1bWlZ96a6xtoQMbjiVzfuRsVaWZE2pCAZB6hp3/ywLKvskhP 0zprmSuK8BHYbtvkpOkQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1recjI-00000001NXX-0KJb; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:20 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1recjD-00000001NVE-1UA1 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:16 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA17DA7; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4C783F762; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:17:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:17:08 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Peng Fan Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" , "sudeep.holla@arm.com" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Aisheng Dong , Nitin Garg , Ranjani Vaidyanathan , Ye Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX OEM pin configuration type Message-ID: References: <20240223071557.2681316-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240226_071715_509561_8AA93413 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 01:16:51PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX OEM pin configuration type > > Sorry to ping early, but this impacts the design and i.MX95 SoC upstream( > although I removed pinctrl to let uboot init pinmux as of now), so I would > like see whether are you ok with the approach or not. This is the best as > of now I could think out to not adding more size to firmware and make the > dts format similar as previous i.MX. > I'll let Linus and Sudeep argument better, but, for my understanding, does this solve all the issue with supporting custom iMX DT pinctrl bindings on top of the current SCMI pinctrl generic driver without the need of your last 2 downstream patches, or I am missing somethimg? Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel