From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96FEBC54E41 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:47:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=pjrfuvQDlzwDMSyGPUZoSqiMRT+EVp8StXdFE7it1Cw=; b=eXAS+TBmoe73No vAg87VLfrhXt3XrUJkx3cN6mNrsL0aMNKwX2K+ZbvJ/GXcnUdRXMF518VQl7JZbJ+EoS8XA5Y9y8u cApGmu63782bHWCsCFuUGRTXlW9JamPfdjd/ncxvEuKi0CGxflSNzSHe/f1hSZlpDjtAn2HDZ+4zQ JKogqfPEuxV1e36PMtKAw0dYxpdthMDWOHyqxH+NBCCtc+7qLAq4Bhi9s0IH2jR+VTzJJZORiczsL Y3kGmtMYKh0/NsG0ev8GORJwaYgi4WBduw7tnpe0kl257a/JBR/maXKW0qI0EVZNYRStxgAC1WUuJ ukhojw9FS/8B3NT3PLOQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rhTFt-0000000DRHl-0mCW; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:46:45 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rhTFp-0000000DREc-0aNM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:46:43 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D631FB; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:47:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDE4D3F762; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 03:46:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:46:32 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Pierre Gondois Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Christian Loehle , Ionela Voinescu , Dietmar Eggemann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Populate fast channel rate_limit Message-ID: References: <20240222135702.2005635-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> <20240222135702.2005635-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240222135702.2005635-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240305_034641_275665_C09A154D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: > Arm SCMI spec. v3.2, s4.5.3.12 PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL > defines a per-domain rate_limit for performance requests: > """ > Rate Limit in microseconds, indicating the minimum time > required between successive requests. A value of 0 > indicates that this field is not applicable or supported > on the platform. > """" > The field is first defined in SCMI v2.0. > > Add support to fetch this value and advertise it through > a fast_switch_rate_limit() callback. > I did a quick check and these changes doesn't conflict with -next SCMI content. So if Viresh is happy to pick them up for v6.9, Acked-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel