From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C73ECD128A for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:53:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ipYqrhwDYmyuE53xrNcemKSi9etBj2wkIgU4zW49MCQ=; b=HBZrjABtg13D5n Qd5z3jouS/PXKgYyIdIjK/Ijc4Mw7qxE79/wQ8UIEx9GxQB6V/ZXaeUp7HYuwg4519wFrTX9hBd2R XattOLuREsL8Brr5Yn/N+TBy56fDr0rLt6JSERtHuYN/rs7L+euL5ztsvBI1ysOPueI75XBBwaCSJ xBKoQNVcgzOeAkilDstQR5xLd+a5sUDtPjeDY1hiYf5XROIyIEDFqMqi9eYJ4E2Q4NABauqW/QqV4 CcGrp3IR6TJBHYVYGBraAS+TzpLH1kQXUnCsY03/ryyIjRv9qww4B9HSSX69kK6ZaFzSEG4HFw6wi ZZaKbgD+34HckHeJ325Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rs13D-0000000GJhl-0ztE; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:53:15 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rs13A-0000000GJhM-3X7n for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:53:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/Bl/OwjvkRnc3iuLd1EflQ37hBKgni5yXCmAhATT0QE=; b=PiwO9vvSSMvRoSlgQTyAXKsXfF i6q82P7v3txfQ6fRRp1k3b1QGNRXUc/Z1GLBKCQK6v+lrr5KfG8DiahSSSTGMjWw5E39Feazv+n6O 7ud4Cmi/3rdkR8Be5lDg86Too3wIi68PRCz7pWklzaf7/FrVu98aUPgrrK2hcX65qPptA5+5Y25gm ou8SeozyTOfhTh17l2vyO+3iWzg6GYUfCyoSjsFPB8wUoVapwZKfI9ZStBGQgj2TOIzavYj3AWxDr Rh7Bux7mlatRmYfvHzvt3yy8+ACl7uk1eXC8Hexq+cDKnpBRRBclI20z3zpoI6GaQP4iPWtu2G0QO RJ2i2ktA==; Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rs137-00000004FQm-1HZz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:53:11 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A921007; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17F233F7B4; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:53:03 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Cristian Marussi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Update examples for protocol@13 Message-ID: References: <20240403111106.1110940-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240403111106.1110940-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240403_145309_576570_3AB54A65 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > Recently we extended the binding for protocol@13 to allow it to be modelled > as a generic performance domain. In a way to promote using the new binding, > let's update the examples. > Does it make sense to keep one DVFS example with #clock-cells until we mark it as deprecated ? Otherwise it may be confusing as the binding still lists. Or leave some comment in the example or something, I am open for suggestions. Other than that, Acked-by: Sudeep Holla -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel