From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F913CD128A for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:33:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cq2E/bBeewH7/vrrXrjXUncXDF69R88pa+Ac8i+jedg=; b=FuGX4KX9cxyN7P SCAWf0/ExrMiV6ztqOU+8CUUW/0pOVybBaNia3Cuk2lps2J/cm3Qz0bIC/bveaJFwoinVEq6jOXHZ 1XEV4w0dBdLKLKkpBJydNoiWPk1gGIrgcf5lNAvHCovNkimjoD+RqLevTzFb4HySeqVzqgs2X9Uor lY+h6qhkuaWvfoEjbZzmAtetA5XQKTgL3mQmGQKUxsrHDNmjTh6qFIvLBP0y04a4MnoyBqGzc38iw Aohod/5+4idZtIepBZ1GKv0PEKnnr0grLTQcl4bLiW0oYkSvZUvjjhophD+M/a9d0pG7ihCKLWkFc 2ganEIJ6naTlV2z3ouaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rs1g6-0000000GUUW-41DS; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:33:26 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rs1g3-0000000GUTy-1SKs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 14:33:24 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E26F1007; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.16.212]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01C423F7B4; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 15:33:17 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Dawei Li Cc: will@kernel.org, yury.norov@gmail.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com, yangyicong@hisilicon.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack Message-ID: References: <20240403125109.2054881-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> <20240403125109.2054881-7-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240403125109.2054881-7-dawei.li@shingroup.cn> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240403_073323_559414_28654016 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 08:51:05PM +0800, Dawei Li wrote: > For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask > variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack > overflow. > > Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate > cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. > > But dynamic allocation in cpuhp's teardown callback is somewhat problematic > for if allocation fails(which is unlikely but still possible): > - If -ENOMEM is returned to caller, kernel crashes for non-bringup > teardown; > - If callback pretends nothing happened and returns 0 to caller, it may > trap system into an in-consisitent/compromised state; > > Use newly-introduced cpumask_any_and_but() to address all issues above. > It eliminates usage of temporary cpumask var in generic way, no matter how > the cpumask var is allocated. > > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland > Signed-off-by: Dawei Li The logic looks good to me, but I'd like the commit message updated the same as per my comment on patch 2. With that commit message: Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland Mark. > --- > drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 10 ++++------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c > index 957058ad0099..c5e328f23841 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c > @@ -690,9 +690,8 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n > { > struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu; > struct pci_dev *pdev; > - int node; > - cpumask_t mask; > unsigned int target; > + int node; > > pcie_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(cpuhp_node, struct dwc_pcie_pmu, cpuhp_node); > /* Nothing to do if this CPU doesn't own the PMU */ > @@ -702,10 +701,9 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n > pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1; > pdev = pcie_pmu->pdev; > node = dev_to_node(&pdev->dev); > - if (cpumask_and(&mask, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask) && > - cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, cpumask_of(cpu))) > - target = cpumask_any(&mask); > - else > + > + target = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask, cpu); > + if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) > target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu); > > if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) { > -- > 2.27.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel