From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FCE1CD11C2 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:34:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=iGT6e48LKt4oWIpy0el3Jda4zlEfEiCic2mqtmbB6qo=; b=WSmSNfB0Gznt6g qpeYEC6gNSsrHat06k02WadDxRpOzDwDUB6Jhk4/oqommK7uqxIv8l5GL8v23RnPsAFfU4TV8BMww yMnEHdXoeuBb8aqRBPhuR/xZoKy6hiKdeJywRhBhBZ63OgsPHX9+Aqu47qvKPXlAZKaFckKRrTOre mTu/TFba4/kuZ2erHQ0smeUUONTONo42IYe8d0YdAR5WMOZISbSp0kc6tdjHQq4BxTPoG8LbKUjnK S3TEj/IdQAk1V/fcCvyBmJacTbsrj2PwGQ3+pAZ5fmivptZ22e1jD4SXLOgXEk5Hx/Z45LcvOQQmI kLkiIrFo3MDkrHuRKxYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rsjhN-00000007Etf-088A; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:33:41 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rsjhJ-00000007Esj-3q7B; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 13:33:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F39CE369D; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EF58C433F1; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:33:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1712324015; bh=zfEeXh3hz25nDeq9dAo0iY9I4+qJizPHM4+Hki6OxD4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RBlURaLrFBp1q2lYBiEiNbuJxjgEpFiuQO3t9ZQdjV4T24hplKn2qODVKd/6j7rKY xpr5VtNZVRz8lS4VG76mWHUZnEWv4TD4GY4VWlOBJHOR2Ms8A7scVANGaXzXB6DkxE 5DlqbxBlew7Ko3emEWT1ERVFUUyn9sNNW8hDRLwFQjkMwMc0nT6e5TUqlv6a72moFR 8ILiJGYHMSUf07W6OPLKy/9Zq26BChP7WKtwcG0O1BTKSFumpjKGr71ZuirCloJs3/ N5dRgMkN9XyKnItvKsbeCjfpUpt0j3AW+C+hKKQFulSoiCz5BdHLTBLhkG15kB/CHs /6AwBuyHdaYdg== Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:33:28 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Damien Le Moal Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Shawn Lin , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rick Wertenbroek , Wilfred Mallawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/18] PCI: endpoint: Introduce pci_epc_function_is_valid() Message-ID: References: <20240330041928.1555578-1-dlemoal@kernel.org> <20240330041928.1555578-2-dlemoal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240330041928.1555578-2-dlemoal@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240405_063338_233605_9B5F48BD X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.52 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 01:19:11PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Introduce the epc core helper function pci_epc_function_is_valid() to > verify that an epc pointer, a physical function number and a virtual > function number are all valid. This avoids repeating the code pattern: > > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(epc) || func_no >= epc->max_functions) > return err; > > if (vfunc_no > 0 && (!epc->max_vfs || vfunc_no > epc->max_vfs[func_no])) > return err; > > in many functions of the endpoint controller core code. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal > --- Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel