public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"Moritz Fischer" <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
	Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
	Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add unit tests for arm_smmu_write_entry
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:09:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh+DxJoAMIXy9O/R@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9-v7-cb149db3a320+3b5-smmuv3_newapi_p2_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:28:20PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Add tests for some of the more common STE update operations that we expect
> to see, as well as some artificial STE updates to test the edges of
> arm_smmu_write_entry. These also serve as a record of which common
> operation is expected to be hitless, and how many syncs they require.
> 
> arm_smmu_write_entry implements a generic algorithm that updates an STE/CD
> to any other abritrary STE/CD configuration. The update requires a
> sequence of write+sync operations with some invariants that must be held
> true after each sync. arm_smmu_write_entry lends itself well to
> unit-testing since the function's interaction with the STE/CD is already
> abstracted by input callbacks that we can hook to introspect into the
> sequence of operations. We can use these hooks to guarantee that
> invariants are held throughout the entire update operation.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240106083617.1173871-3-mshavit@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/Kconfig                         |  12 +-
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/Makefile        |   2 +
>  .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c   |   6 +-
>  .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c  | 467 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c   |  36 +-
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h   |  30 ++
 
> +config ARM_SMMU_V3_KUNIT_TEST
> +	tristate "KUnit tests for arm-smmu-v3 driver"  if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	depends on KUNIT
> +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	help
> +	  Enable this option to unit-test arm-smmu-v3 driver functions.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.

Forgot that my SVA sanity doesn't cover this patch. And it looks
like some problems here when building it with "=m":

ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.o
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_abort_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_get_ste_used" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_write_entry" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!

Likely needs MODULE_LICENSE and some EXPORT_SYMBOLs.

With built-in '=y' and a MODULE_LICENSE, tests passed:
[   13.244780] KTAP version 1
[   13.247542] 1..1
[   13.249421]     KTAP version 1
[   13.252538]     # Subtest: arm-smmu-v3-kunit-test
[   13.257344]     1..16
[   13.259727]     ok 1 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_abort
[   13.259789]     ok 2 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_abort_to_bypass
[   13.265895]     ok 3 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_cdtable_to_abort
[   13.271988]     ok 4 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_abort_to_cdtable
[   13.278172]     ok 5 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_cdtable_to_bypass
[   13.284353]     ok 6 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_cdtable
[   13.290636]     ok 7 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_cdtable_s1dss_change
[   13.296917]     ok 8 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s1dssbypass_to_stebypass
[   13.303464]     ok 9 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_stebypass_to_s1dssbypass
[   13.310357]     ok 10 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_abort
[   13.317265]     ok 11 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_abort_to_s2
[   13.323104]     ok 12 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_bypass
[   13.328937]     ok 13 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_s2
[   13.334861]     ok 14 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s1_to_s2
[   13.340787]     ok 15 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1
[   13.346364]     ok 16 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_non_hitless
[   13.351883] # arm-smmu-v3-kunit-test: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
[   13.357667] # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16
[   13.364163] ok 1 arm-smmu-v3-kunit-test

Once those are fixed,
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16 19:28 [PATCH v7 0/9] Make the SMMUv3 CD logic match the new STE design (part 2a/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an ops indirection to the STE code Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 20:18   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:02   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:09     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make CD programming use arm_smmu_write_entry() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 20:48   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18 13:01   ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-18 16:08     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-19 21:07   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:29     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:08       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:29         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 15:30           ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the CD generation for S1 domains into a function Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 21:22   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:10   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:52     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate clearing a CD table entry Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make arm_smmu_alloc_cd_ptr() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 22:19   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:14   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 14:20     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:19       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:01         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 14:47           ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:55             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate the CD table entry in advance Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the CD generation for SVA into a function Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17  7:37   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-17 13:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 16:25       ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-17 16:26   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18  4:40   ` Michael Shavit
2024-04-18 14:28     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole CD in arm_smmu_make_s1_cd() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17  7:43   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add unit tests for arm_smmu_write_entry Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17  8:09   ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2024-04-17 14:16     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 16:13       ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18  4:39       ` Michael Shavit
2024-04-18 12:48         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-18 14:34           ` Michael Shavit
2024-04-19 21:24   ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 14:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:33       ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-16 19:40 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] Make the SMMUv3 CD logic match the new STE design (part 2a/3) Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zh+DxJoAMIXy9O/R@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=moritzf@google.com \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox