From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB95C67861 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:59:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NDmOB5G5HvDnS0KMRnxjsF+A6vADSzduGhzZn7Z0qvQ=; b=jv/qiSxkblJ5J+ srmN5iitjInCEKQ+d7ag4I6g68sWZVkO3HLiR9JQwVhDNBhMVcLTth2O2aJbMdEg0vyifXsIkHCB4 +fdNxRYNmPjxYy6+Hj42aU7Z6lVW57cXR8vZGFfGePoKyPd6HPvtjE3DmKLWXcHbeUULJSZv32JI9 nMgSXkp8KrHxsSD3hk1DDKaClzbbI23EELJFHYL+4K84FaiiR5swypRNINdqbTxn1zcBFhGI0dpcF q5M0JFze/KFIWtyUljCwyVzO4+aS86XbDKn/egfhm27SJmAFWl0p6IKQDEoaDeN3KAklosKnaWFwk j5i/a4UYDPleAlcnEoIQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ru7KA-000000016Ln-0sJE; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:59:26 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ru7K7-000000016L1-2GRG for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:59:24 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3A4DA7; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE60F3F6C4; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 01:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:59:16 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" Cc: Cristian Marussi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Peng Fan , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for i.MX BBM protocol Message-ID: References: <20240405-imx95-bbm-misc-v2-v2-0-9fc9186856c2@nxp.com> <20240405-imx95-bbm-misc-v2-v2-3-9fc9186856c2@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240409_015923_642037_1D04F2E8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:39:25PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Peng Fan > > > > The i.MX BBM protocol is for managing i.MX BBM module which provides > > RTC and BUTTON feature. > > > > I appreciate that you added versioning but I think a bit of documentation > about what the protocol and its comamnds purpose is still lacking, as asked > by Sudeep previously > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZeGtoJ7ztSe8Kg8R@bogus/#t > I have decided to ignore all these vendor protocol patches until they have some documentation to understand what these protocol are for, what are the commands, their input/output parameter details, any conditions are the caller and callee,..etc very similar to SCMI spec. To start with can you please expand what is BBM or MISC protocol is ? Don't expect me to respond if the requested details are still missing in the future versions, I am going to ignore it silently. I have asked for these in atleast 2 different threads may be not just NXP patches but in one instance Qcom patches, but they apply equally here. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel