From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B85C4345F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2iElO7pcJwzYGDzx2H3wIL5ajEaunTZ86Ga+3GnydNk=; b=wXQyXg6PKX09v/ 2qkpEG+tabwBXFsuIOFwqIQIkY9ro8Ngs1+ogmJepOu2BFnwlkHict4Sm8XbT9BPAXoyb7OnmIWqa 8qlCzvJSH1k0XpyxHhbG8kA1ohakQuf8ormTartKdNG8GOJYY6uYvoPOV6TxsXZlz+EgmZEYP8J1G bDfW0JZe5TV9Bksmw2f6eKI0aRUirrbUXhr0h9yv3QvhJmMDmzF7w1SUOzxf1EymFpCNE2/VuF5zM IoqPYd0qi8gp+62W7DeC92seAa/sLxh2NFe4ibbCrfqjqVzLLykQmA24PS0deSt0Hy7RnyDr4rSfN dphfg0ndAS1YMtsFLBlw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rx4ng-0000000Fzzo-0t44; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:54:08 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rx4nd-0000000FzzL-3mIN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:54:07 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F651339; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:54:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0A473F738; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 05:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:54:00 +0100 From: Cristian Marussi To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, quic_sibis@quicinc.com, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add dedicated vendor protocols submenu Message-ID: References: <20240408093052.3801576-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20240408093052.3801576-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20240417120945.jjcpfwknj5urb6bk@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240417120945.jjcpfwknj5urb6bk@bogus> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240417_055406_014924_F4F5AAFC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:09:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:30:52AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Add a dedicated Kconfig submenu and directory where to collect SCMI vendor > > protocols implementations. > > > > This looks fine. But I would wait until the first vendor protocol is > ready to be merged to merge this as baseline. Hope that's OK. > Absolutely, I think some vendor protocols currently on the list (beside their ready-to-merge status) will rebase on this once this is in -next. What remain to discuss really, it is, as I mentioned offline, if we want to also group the vendor protocols headers (the one containing the public protocol ops) somewhere...I think now they are just placed on top level include/ named like /vendor1_scmi_something.h /scmi_vendor2_something_else.h ..or (as I now remembered you mentioned offline) just leave as it is for now and then post a patch on top to shuffle around the headers into some common include/scmi/ top dir...not sure anyway if it worth...maybe some header name convention is fine (but I ignore if there are rules about polluting more or less the top level /include/ dir :D) I assume also that this mechanism is fine for vendors at this point, since all the feedback we've got from them till now was on specific (and very much welcome) code-reviewed stuff... Thanks, Cristian _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel