From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286E1CD128A for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:36:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=XLjxSZsWlvMqZtZiriMDKRumyNz7Lqye0QztFU4a0qs=; b=ehn+2bGu5dlEA7 WRbid9EtPCPqxOW2Z1lYdyYPRr4fD1GXovcQ/LGjq5Z9T0x2LdvhGTRpIrC6GfefCiiFjlhtIrckc zzIXYK84ZyDKNKCcoIR8frdx3RAV1PDcFY3oOJGO7UlZWiSyNsQgga5tpVRflCd2Mw9AGHcppJot2 WnZ9uSLcGtzcuZM6ay5B2XtvwsGz2W+oGMtpDMYs7Lwf1nTG8b4d1A2TY2Wsv8w/4ooAnpgZim4E1 JOfExGGwOCcQPy0uTCJSPU8rLzV+Z53C2zmgg88lfLtztyikcysyqkQoT6vQZuEiVPaQ7xCm9UN/v MFHwkzRXuL3VHrTXUriw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ruXBD-00000006tt2-1pO9; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:35:55 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ruXBA-00000006tsE-45v3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:35:54 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3858139F; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 141CE3F6C4; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:35:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: Ulf Hansson , Cristian Marussi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Update examples for protocol@13 Message-ID: References: <20240403111106.1110940-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20240410115637.GA4042282-robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240410115637.GA4042282-robh@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240410_053553_087571_0810C720 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:56:37AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:52:08PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 15:53, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > Recently we extended the binding for protocol@13 to allow it to be modelled > > > > as a generic performance domain. In a way to promote using the new binding, > > > > let's update the examples. > > > > > > > > > > Does it make sense to keep one DVFS example with #clock-cells until we > > > mark it as deprecated ? Otherwise it may be confusing as the binding still > > > lists. Or leave some comment in the example or something, I am open for > > > suggestions. > > > > I am certainly fine with either way! > > > > However, if we intend to make #clock-cells deprecated down the road, > > maybe it's better to start avoiding the use of it already now. That > > said, what do you think of following up $subject patch with an update > > to Juno's dts(i) to move to #power-domains-cells too? That would mean > > we get a nice reference for how to use this too. > > > > > > > > Other than that, > > > > > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > > > Are you picking this via your scmi tree, or which route is this going? > Sorry Ulf, this slipped through the cracks, will queue it. > Please take via SCMI tree. > Sure > Acked-by: Rob Herring Thanks -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel