Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: arm_ffa: Add support to run inside a guest/VM under a hypervisor

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Marc Bonnici <marc.bonnici@arm.com>,
	Olivier Deprez <Olivier.Deprez@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: arm_ffa: Add support to run inside a guest/VM under a hypervisor
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:30:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zhfz9tLO0Z4hkj9T@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44HBS_HqnRrNjYh+nELHx0NyB6CoX-fZEBGyB_Z3=QSTaQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:30:41PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:57 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for running the driver inside a guest/VM under a hypervisor.
> >
> > The main difference include:
> > 1. supporting introducing notification pending interrupt and
> > 2. Avoiding creation of all the notification bitmaps as they must be
> >    created by the hypervisor before the VM is initialised
> >
> > The guest may need to use a notification pending interrupt instead of
> > or in addition to the schedule receiver interrupt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > This is almost identical to you single patch now. Just split into
> > 3 patches with refactoring kept separate. Can you please check if
> > this continues to work on your setup(unlikely to break anything).
> > Once you confirm, I am happy to queue it.
> 
> Works for me:
> Tested-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> 

Thanks !

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel