From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Michal Tomek <mtdev79b@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Jon Lin <jon.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:42:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhksQc1kNDWHAfWw@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhkAB6goB4TmcmWu@matsya>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 03:03:59PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On 11-04-24, 15:01, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > This series is based on: linux-phy phy/fixes
> > (Since there are other rockchip,pcie3-phy changes there that have not
> > yet reached mainline and which would otherwise have caused conflicts.)
>
> I merged the fixes into next and tried to apply this patch but second
> one fails for me. I guess it needs to be rebased.
>
> Always based these changes on phy/next or phy/fixes+next (which is what
> I will end up with to resolve)
I based it on phy/fixes since there were commits for this driver in phy/fixes
that were not in phy/next, so I did it for you to not get conflicts :)
Since this still gave you conflicts, there must have been other changes in
phy/next for this driver. I must have missed that, sorry.
I see that you have now merged phy/fixes into phy/next, that will make things
easier, thank you. I will send out a V2 based on phy/next shortly.
Kind regards,
Niklas
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 13:01 [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support Niklas Cassel
2024-04-11 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip,pcie3-phy: add rockchip,rx-common-refclk-mode Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 7:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-11 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-snps-pcie3: add support for rockchip,rx-common-refclk-mode Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 9:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] rockchip pcie3-phy separate refclk support Vinod Koul
2024-04-12 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-04-13 6:06 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhksQc1kNDWHAfWw@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jon.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mtdev79b@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox