From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jbaron@akamai.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: optimize code duplication in arch_static_branch/_jump function
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:24:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiYs3itsmdOmuPq4@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240422063853.3568733-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:38:53PM +0800, George Guo wrote:
> From: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
>
> Extracted the jump table definition code from the arch_static_branch and
> arch_static_branch_jump functions into a macro JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY to reduce
> code duplication and improve readability.
The commit title says this is an optimization, but the commit message says this
is a cleanup (and this clearly is not an optimization).
This seems to be copying what x86 did in commit:
e1aa35c4c4bc71e4 ("jump_label, x86: Factor out the __jump_table generation")
... where the commit message is much clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h
> index 6aafbb789991..69407b70821e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h
> @@ -15,16 +15,19 @@
>
> #define JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE
>
> +#define JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY \
> + ".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t" \
> + ".align 3 \n\t" \
> + ".long 1b - ., %l[l_yes] - . \n\t" \
> + ".quad %c0 - . \n\t" \
> + ".popsection \n\t"
> +
> static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch(struct static_key * const key,
> const bool branch)
> {
> asm goto(
> "1: nop \n\t"
> - " .pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
> - " .align 3 \n\t"
> - " .long 1b - ., %l[l_yes] - . \n\t"
> - " .quad %c0 - . \n\t"
> - " .popsection \n\t"
> + JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY
> : : "i"(&((char *)key)[branch]) : : l_yes);
If we really need to factor this out, I'd prefer that the JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY()
macro took the label and key as arguments, similar to what we do for
_ASM_EXTABLE_*().
Mark.
>
> return false;
> @@ -37,11 +40,7 @@ static __always_inline bool arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key * const ke
> {
> asm goto(
> "1: b %l[l_yes] \n\t"
> - " .pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\" \n\t"
> - " .align 3 \n\t"
> - " .long 1b - ., %l[l_yes] - . \n\t"
> - " .quad %c0 - . \n\t"
> - " .popsection \n\t"
> + JUMP_TABLE_ENTRY
> : : "i"(&((char *)key)[branch]) : : l_yes);
>
> return false;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 6:38 [PATCH 1/1] arm64: optimize code duplication in arch_static_branch/_jump function George Guo
2024-04-22 9:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2024-04-25 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] cleanup arch_static_branch/_jump George Guo
2024-04-25 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: simplify arch_static_branch/_jump function George Guo
2024-04-30 8:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] cleanup arch_static_branch/_jump George Guo
2024-04-30 8:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] arm64: simplify arch_static_branch/_jump function George Guo
2024-05-03 17:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] cleanup arch_static_branch/_jump Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiYs3itsmdOmuPq4@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dongtai.guo@linux.dev \
--cc=guodongtai@kylinos.cn \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox