From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17161C10F1A for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 15:00:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=FhwlWpNX90hNwzWPLHHsnYPwi1f7OcVEu8WTJFtkX8Y=; b=pWcvvfB8gZeiGp lWvZKShs5X5O9zFCCB2GcFqBHwQI15lV6iZqvKdmiYLeIHfBWB1w8nqzI9aHXCsp1AU5LI2/h1EEn X/fke7CG7TGOEDqrbmwzTEH/9ByeTVv46/Fa+jelcpYINMZwBCPH0tsR+iWJLK22NaFR92IGG64cv D8QpNwUs9gNKz9quzDfMCijc2VLgItDZ/KNhexpU7y7AOIzsinqzBUf+LW6mMX5VEej+SZcmpZgPw KkqXKTMDm+t43dh44cTfvd0XCrLm+SJCZa9MRoGF0/DlSH2yf5O45sbCBVo8imFofEQ9Oke0jXgO9 BOJXQmuQjxbgmy4j0jbQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s4MIb-0000000BdCx-2VYG; Tue, 07 May 2024 15:00:09 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s4MIS-0000000BdAP-3IqW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 May 2024 15:00:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EA0CE1394; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C703C2BBFC; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:59:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715093997; bh=m1MQLaFDGrfN6P6zi84CA547mIdGW4QH5fBBCzDskGo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bET6S8Sp6njAjTyzEh5PxJ/obAZrJkfB+xs0RRD04XD+2DffyIaw71eDNvfBUyNNk U7PG9Jtc9nRYPuedBSlCvtzJ9H20k8j0sLzQvSK1icS521V/DaGRcmIJGWUe26E7rS SEyeKRkqunXq/PsvI4peOSv+z2IG8EGRecMC0UQTSF5GuDhluuCC8kRs51NzQ8quKq LQulxLIV7twktBPiL0Egc0z9hn602kOtx3LlA2k6h9B63Rydk+9VEPX42xpXnpLGmI vyGaaEQpZfB9tM3hLsXtL8Yy4AXg54TnAtFNh9UeIwIhB4hA9NuwCDdnlKm3sF4yT3 TNDmUpynzoe8w== Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 11:59:55 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: James Clark Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com, scclevenger@os.amperecomputing.com, coresight@lists.linaro.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org, Alexander Shishkin , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , John Garry , Will Deacon , Leo Yan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] coresight: Use per-sink trace ID maps for Perf sessions Message-ID: References: <20240429152207.479221-1-james.clark@arm.com> <4ab27bea-ac94-48c3-827c-9f2eddcdd50a@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ab27bea-ac94-48c3-827c-9f2eddcdd50a@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240507_080001_119919_5BC04223 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 11:01:07AM +0100, James Clark wrote: > On 03/05/2024 21:23, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > I guess I can pick the tooling part now, right? Further reviewing would > > be nice tho. > Is it ok if we wait for the driver changes to be merged first? There > might some review comments which need a format change to the packets and > then a re-write of the tool changes. Ok > You could take 1 and 2 though because they're unrelated. Done. - Arnaldo _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel